Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:58:20.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agreement and equation between Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an old age psychiatry outpatient clinic population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

D. Adamis*
Affiliation:
Sligo Mental Health Services, Psychiatry, Sligo, Ireland
L. Helmi
Affiliation:
Sligo Mental Health Services, Sligo Medical Academy, NUI Galway, Psychiatry, Sligo, Ireland
O. Fitzpatrick
Affiliation:
Sligo Mental Health Services, Psychiatry, Sligo, Ireland
D. Meagher
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Limerick, Psychiatry, Limerick, Ireland
G. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Sligo Mental Health Services, Sligo Medical Academy, NUI Galway, Psychiatry, Sligo, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Both MMSE and MoCA are two widely used cognitive screening test. Comparison of the two tests has been done in specific populations (Parkinson) but not in general elderly psychiatric populations. In research, equating methodologies has been used to compare results among studies that use different scales, which measure the same construct.

Aims

To explore their level of agreement within a particular clinical setting.

Objectives

(a) To find MoCA and MMSE agreement. (b) To derive a conversion formula between the two scales and test it in a random population of similar setting.

Methods

Prospective study of consecutive community dwelling older patients who attend outpatient clinic or day hospital. Both tests were administered from the same researcher the same day in random order.

Results

The total sample (n = 135) was randomly divided in two. One from where the equating rule derived (n = 70) and a second (n = 65) in which the derived conversion was tested. Agreement of the two scales (Pearson's r) was 0.86 (P < 0.001), and Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) was 0.57 (95% CI 0.45–0.66). In the second sample, we convert the MoCA scores to MMSE scores according to equating rule from the first sample and after we examined the agreement between the converted MMSE scores and the originals. The Pearson's r was 0.89 (n = 65, P < 0.001) and the CCC 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92).

Conclusions

Although the two scales overlap considerably, the agreement is modest. The conversion rule derived showed promising accuracy in this population but need further testing in other populations.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW284
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.