Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:08:00.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AS03-02 - Reactions and Consequences Following Echr Judgements in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

K. Goethals
K. Goethals*
Affiliation:
Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium Mental Health Care WNB - Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Halsteren, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this contribution some recent reactions and consequences following ECHR judgments will be discussed.

First of all, there was the case ‘Brand against the Dutch state’, concerning the TBS passers-term. The consequence of the ECHR judgment in this case was that some parts of prisons were designated to TBS wards.

Next, partly due to the ECHR, psychiatric penitentiary centres (PPC's) were developed in the prison system.

Finally, the ECHR judgment about the German ‘Sicherungsverwahrung’ has it importance with regard to Dutch long-stay facilities in the TBS system.

Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 27 , Issue S1: Abstracts of the 20th European Congress of Psychiatry , 2012 , pp. 1
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.