Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:42:31.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Baseline personality functioning correlates with 6 month outcome in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Secondo Fassino ,
Andrea Pierò ,
Elena Mongelli ,
Maria Luisa Caviglia ,
Nadia Delsedime ,
Federica Busso ,
Carla Gramaglia ,
Giovanni Abbate Daga ,
Paolo Leombruni  and
Andrea Ferrero
Secondo Fassino*
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Andrea Pierò
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Elena Mongelli
Affiliation:
Hospital Complex, “Fatebenefratelli” S. Maurizio Canavese, Turin, Italy AFaR, Association “Fatebenefratelli” for Research, Turin, Italy
Maria Luisa Caviglia
Affiliation:
Hospital Complex, “Fatebenefratelli” S. Maurizio Canavese, Turin, Italy AFaR, Association “Fatebenefratelli” for Research, Turin, Italy
Nadia Delsedime
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Federica Busso
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Carla Gramaglia
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Giovanni Abbate Daga
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Paolo Leombruni
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, V. Cherasco 11, CAP 10126Turin, Italy
Andrea Ferrero
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Sanity, Unit of Psychotherapy, Asl 7, Regione Piemonte, Turin, Italy
*
*E-mail address: secondo.fassino@unito.it
Get access

Abstract

Objective

The assessment of outcome in schizophrenic patients should consider both the response to treatment and the recovery of social skills. The aim was to evaluate the outcome and related psychostructural and clinical factors in schizophrenic patients after they underwent 6 months of residential multimodal treatment.

Methods

Fifty-two schizophrenic patients enrolled in a multimodal treatment program were included in the study. Symptomatology and social functioning were assessed with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP) was used for the psychostructural evaluation.

Results

After 6 months there was a significant improvement in the global scores of BPRS, SOFAS, and some areas of KAPP. The personality (KAPP) and social-occupational functioning (SOFAS) at baseline (T0) correlated with the global score of BPRS at 6 months (T6); moreover, SOFAS at T6 correlated with BPRS and KAPP at T0 and with the illness duration.

Conclusions

The better the personality functioning in schizophrenic patients the better seems to be the response to treatment, with regard to symptoms as well as rehabilitation. Personality assessment might be useful for the individualisation of therapies, even within the context of a standardised program.

Keywords

SchizophreniaRehabilitationSocial skill trainingPsychodynamic assessmentOutcome
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , May 2003 , pp. 93 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvin, J. Terapia musicale. Roma: Armando; 1986.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd Rev. ed. Washington (DC): APA; 1987.Google Scholar
Andres, K, Pfammatter, M, Garst, F, Teschner, C, Brenner, HD. Effects of a coping-orientated group therapy for schizophrenia and schizoaffec-tive patients: a pilot study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101:318–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
reasen, NC. Schizophrenia-from mind to molecule. Washington (DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994.Google Scholar
Anthony, WA, Cohen, M, Farkas, M. Psychiatric rehabilitation. Boston: Boston University; 1990.Google Scholar
Bellack, A, Mueser, K. Psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1993;19:317–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bustillo, JR, Lauriello, J, Horan, WP, Keith, SJ. The psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia: an update. Am J Psychiatr 2001;158:163–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eikelman, B, Reker, T. A modern therapeutic approach for chronically mentally ill patients-results of a four-year prospective study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;84:357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, RC, Doppelt, LH. Rehabilitation of the chronic psychiatric patient: an adlerian perspective. Indiv Psychol 1987;43:296–307.Google Scholar
Fassino, S, Ferrero, A. Discussion groups with chronic psychotics in the context of community therapy. Minerva Psichiatr 1992;33:67–72.Google ScholarPubMed
First, MB, Gibbon, M, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW, Benjamin, LS. SCID II personality questionnaire. Washington (DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Gabbard, GO. Empirical evidence and psychotherapy: a growing scientific base. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargreaves, WA, Shumway, M. Effectiveness of mental health services for the severely mentally ill. In: Taube, CA, Hohmann, A, editors. The future of mental health services research. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1989.Google Scholar
Hilsenroth, MJ, Ackerman, SJ, Blagys, MD. Reliabilityand validity of DSM IV axis V. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1858–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, NA, Rendall, M, Sederer, L. Psychosocial treatment in schizophrenia: a review of the past 20 years. J Nerv Ment Dis 2000; 188:187–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kernberg, O. Structural interviewing. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1981; 1:169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachar, D, Bailley, SE, Rhoades, HM, Varner, RV. Use of BPRS-A percent change scores to identify significant clinical improvement: accuracy of treatment response classification in acute psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatry Res 1999;89:259–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leclerc, C, Lesage, AD, Ricard, N, Lecomte, T, Cyr, M. Assessment of a new rehabilitative coping skills module for persons with schizophrenia. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2000;70:380–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecomte, T, Cyr, M, Lesage, A, Wilde, J, Leclerc, C, Ricard, N. Efficacy of a self-esteem module in the empowerment of individuals with schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis 1999;187:406–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, RP, Wallace, CJ, Blackwell, G, Kopelowicz, A, Vaccaro, JV, Mintz, J. Skills training versus psychosocial occupational therapy for persons with persistent schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155: 1087–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukoff, D, Nuectherlain, KH, Ventura, J. Manual for the expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Schizophr Bull 1986;12:594–602.Google Scholar
Lysaker, PH, Bell, MD, Bryson, G, Kaplan, E. Personality as a predictor of the variability of insight in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis 1999; 187:119–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macholdt, U, Korabelnikov, K, Pink, E. Factors delaying rehabilitation in inpatient treatment of schizophrenic patients. Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol 1984;36:202–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Mcglashan, TH. Psychosocial treatments in schizophrenia. In: reasen, NC, editor. Schizophrenia-from mind to molecule. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press; 1994.Google Scholar
Mosak, H. Adlerian psychotherapy. In: Corsini, R, Wedding, D, editors. Current psychotherapies. Peacock: Itasca (IL); 1989. p. 65–118.Google Scholar
Mosak, HH, Maniacci, M. A primer of psychology. Philadelphia: Brunner-Mazel; 1999.Google Scholar
Patterson, DA, Lee, MS. Field trial of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale-Modified. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1386–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Roy-Byrne, P, Dagadakis, C, Unutzer, J, Ries, R. Evidence for limited validityof the revised Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psy-chiatr Serv 1996;47:864–6.Google Scholar
Siani, R, Siciliani, O, Burti, L. Strategie di psicoterapia e riabilitazione. Milano: Feltrinelli; 1990.Google Scholar
Smith, TE, Hull, JW, Romanelli, S, Fertuck, E, Weiss, KA. Symptoms and neurocognition as rate limiters in skills training of psychotic patients. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1817–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW, Gibbon, M. Instruction manual for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM III R. New York: Biometric Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1987.Google Scholar
SPSS Base 8.0: Application guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 1998.Google Scholar
Starkey, D, Glick, B, O’Donnel, C. Who’s the patient here? Inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation in a state hospital setting. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 1997;35:10–5.Google Scholar
Stein, HT, Edwards, ME. Classical Adlerian theory and practice. In: Marcus, P, Rosenberg, A, editors. Psychoanalytic versions of the human condition: philosophies of life and their impact on practice. New York: New York University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
Svensson, B, Hansson, L. Rehabilitation of schizophrenic and other long-term mentally ill patients. Results from a prospective study of a comprehensive inpatient treatment program based on cognitive therapy. Eur Psychiatry 1999;14:325–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svensson, B, Hansson, L. Therapeutic alliance in cognitive therapy for schizophrenic and other long-term mentally ill patients: development and relationship to outcome in an in-patient treatment programme. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;99:281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgalsboen, AK.Full recovery from schizophrenia: the prognostic role of premorbid adjustment, symptoms at first admission, precipitating events and gender. Psychiatry Res 1999;88:143–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turrina, C, Siani, R, Regini, C, Campana, A, Bologna, R, Siciliani, O. Inter-observer and test-retest reliability of the Italian version of the Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile in two groups of psychiatric patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;93:282–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventura, J, Green, M, Shaner, A, Liberman, RP. Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Int J Methods Psychiatry Res 1993;3:221–44.Google Scholar
Wallace, CJ. Psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychopharmacol Bull 1993; 29:537–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Weinryb, RM, Rossel, RJ. Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile-KAPP. Manual. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;83:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinryb, RM, Rossel, RJ, Asberg, M. The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. II. Interdisciplinary and cross-cultural reliability. Acta Psychi-atr Scand 1991;83:73–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinryb, RM, Rossel, RJ, Asberg, M. The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. I. Validity and dimensionality. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;83: 64–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinryb, RM, Gustavsson, JP,Asberg, M, Rossel, RJ. Stability over time of character assessment using a psychodynamic instrument and personality inventories. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992;86:179–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.