Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:54:55.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Challenging Behaviour in People with Intellectual Disabilities: The Assessment and Intervention Team

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

K. Courtenay*
Affiliation:
UCL, Department Mental Health Sciences, London, United Kingdom
S. Jaydeokar
Affiliation:
Barnet Enfield Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, Intellectual Disabilities, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) present with behaviours that challenge community services. Community models of care as alternatives to hospital care exist but are often vary in their function. Certain strategies have been developed to manage challenging behaviour in people with ID. Data from a three-year period on a community-based service for people with ID and challenging behaviour that uses an objective, multi-disciplinary approach is presented.

Methods

A case note survey of adults with ID under the care of the Assessment and Intervention Team (AIT), a challenging behaviour service in the London Borough of Haringey.

Results

Over the three-year period, 65 adults were managed by AIT. Forty-four were male and 21 were female. The age range was 21–64 years of age. The level of ID was mild ID 61%, moderate 39%. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder (25%); mood disorder (20%); developmental disorder (40%); dementia (10%); challenging behaviour (45%). Six people (11%) were admitted to hospital during their time with AIT. The length of care under AIT ranged from four to fourteen months.

Conclusions

AIT managed effectively people with ID living in the community who presented with complex problems putting their placement at risk. The rate of hospital admission was reduced in this period compared with the previous three years. The length of stay in in-patient services was reduced. The most common reasons for the behaviours included mental illness and ‘challenging behaviour’. People with developmental disorders were a large proportion. Community alternatives are effective with positive benefits to the person.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV750
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.