Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:43:48.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Con

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Musalek*
Affiliation:
Anton Proksch Institute, Gräfin Zichy Straße 4-6, Vienna, 1230, Austria

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The analysis of the historical development of the currently used diagnosis schizophrenia in DSM or ICD classification indicates that sticking to established terms and methodologies more and more develops to an obstacle in schizophrenia research. The aim of the currently used operational diagnostic approach was to reach reliability of diagnoses between different psychiatrists and researchers as high as possible. This should improve the communication between different research groups and better the comparison of study results. The aim of a high reliability has surely been reached, however, the expected striking progress in research and clinical praxis failed to materialize till today. Reliability, which means agreement, does not simultaneously means validity. Modern brain and genetic research requires more homogenous clinical syndromes or ‘diseases’ to examine them with scientifically based methodologies and technologies. The prerequisite for doing this, however, is going back to clinical and empirical realities and to integrate these realities into the development of a new generation of classification systems that are free of dogmatic thinking.

Disclosure of interest

The author declares that he has no competing interest.

Type
Debate: Is the concept of schizophrenia useful?
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.