Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:55:42.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coping strategies among medical and paramedic frontline healthcare workers during the coronavirus pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

I. Kammoun
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
O. Maatouk*
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
R. Kammoun
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
M. Shiri
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
H. Nefzi
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
K. Ben Salah
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
M. Karoui
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
F. Ellouz
Affiliation:
Razi hospital, Psychiatry G Department, Mannouba, Tunisia
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The epidemic of COVID-19 has affected the psychological health of people, especially frontline medical and paramedical staff. Several coping strategies have been used to combat the impact of this virus on their lives.

Objectives

Describe the impact of coronavirus on mental health and identify coping strategies

Methods

We carried out a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study, conducted over a period of two months ( september and october 2020), in 22 hospitals in Tunisia, including frontline medical and paramedical staff. To evaluate anxiety and depression, we used the Beck Inventory. To identify coping strategies, we used the Brief COPE.

Results

We collected 78 professionals. The mean age was 29.86+-5.4. The majority were medical residents (67.9%) working in covid units in 39.7% of cases. The rythm of work was daily in almost half of the cases, giving direct care to the patients tested positive in 76.9%. More than half had not received adequate training, and protective equipment was available in only 50% of cases. We found 35.9% of the staff who had to move for fear of infecting their families. More than half of the frontline staff were victims of stigma (57.7%). Depression and anxiety were tested minor in 40%. The most used coping strategy in the face of this distressing virus was social support (64.1%) followed by emotion-focused mechanisms (53,8%). Social support strategy was significantly correlated with prevention of anxiety (p=0.048)

Conclusions

Participants practiced and recommended various coping strategies to deal with stress, depression and anxiety emerging from COVID-19 pandemic.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.