Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:07:15.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a brief screen for violence risk (V-RISK-10) in acute and general psychiatry: An introduction with emphasis on findings from a naturalistic test of interrater reliability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

S. Bjørkly ,
P. Hartvig ,
F.-A. Heggen ,
H. Brauer  and
T.A. Moger
S. Bjørkly*
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Box 2110, 6402Molde, Norway
P. Hartvig
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Box 2110, 6402Molde, Norway
F.-A. Heggen
Affiliation:
Acute Psychiatric Department, Ullevål University Hospital, 0407Oslo, Norway
H. Brauer
Affiliation:
Aker University Hospital, 0514Oslo, Norway
T.A. Moger
Affiliation:
Institute of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Norway IMB/Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1122, 0317Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +47 71 21 40 12; fax: +71 21 40 50. E-mail address: stal.bjorkly@himolde.no (S. Bjørkly).
Get access

Abstract

Most violence risk assessment scales were originally developed for use in forensic settings at the time of discharge or release of patients into the community after long-term treatment. However, there is a considerable need for specialized, brief and structured risk assessment tools to inform risk decisions in short-term psychiatric treatment. The present study reports on research findings from the development and implementation of the violence risk screening-10 (V-RISK-10) in two acute psychiatric settings in Norway. The 10-item screen is easy to use, time-saving and may be used for screening of violence risk during hospital stay and after discharge into the community. Prospective validation studies of the screen concerning inpatient and post-release community violence have been conducted. Although data analyses are not yet complete, preliminary findings indicate that the screen has good predictive validity. This suggests that the screen is a promising tool in short-term acute psychiatric settings. However, the importance of reliability in mental health data and tests is well recognized, and a screen with good predictive validity is not worth much if clinicians are unable to agree on the scoring of one and the same patient. In this article we report results from a naturalistic interrater reliability investigation that involved 25 mental health professionals and 73 acute psychiatric patients. V-RISK-10 scoring was accomplished by two raters for each patient. The interrater reliability value for total scores was acceptable. Variations pertaining to the individual V-RISK-10 item, patient characteristics and rater characteristics are discussed.

Keywords

Violence riskScreenV-RISK-10Acute psychiatry
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , September 2009 , pp. 388 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almvik, R.Woods, P.Rasmussen, K.The Brøset Violence Checklist, sensitivity, specificity and interrater reliability. J Interpers Viol 2000;15:1284–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, S.Robbins, P.C.Silver, E.Vesselinov, R.Steadman, H.J.Monahan, J.et al.A multiple-models approach to violence risk assessment among people with mental disorder. Crim Justice Behav 2004;31:324–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørkly, S.Prediction of aggression in psychiatric patients: a review of prospective prediction studies. Clin Psychol Rev 1995;15:475–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daffern, M.The predictive validity and practical utility of structured schemes used to assess risk for aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings. Aggress Violence Behav 2007;12:116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, K.S.Cox, D.N.Webster, C.D.Violence risk assessment: science and practice. Leg Crim Psychol 1999;4:149–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, K.S.Ogloff, J.R.P.Nicholls, T.L.Grant, I.Assessing the risk of violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist:Screening Version. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67:917–930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas KS, Guy LS, Weir J. HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: overview and annotated bibliography.(current update to January 12, 2005). Available from: http://www.sfu.ca/psychology/groups/faculty/hart/violink.htm).Google Scholar
Hartvig, P.Alfarnes, A.A.Skjønberg, M.Moger, T.A.Østberg, B.Brief checklists for assessing violence risk among patients discharged from acute psychiatric facilities: a preliminary study. Nord J Psychiatry 2006;60:243–248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klassen, D.O‘Connor, W.A.Assessing the risk of violence in released mental patients: a cross-validation study. Psychol Assess 1989;1:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, R.Corbiere, M.Milord, R.Morrison, J.G.Craib, K.Yassi, A.et al.Use of a violencerisk assessment tool in an acute care hospital. AAOHN J 2006;54:481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, C.W.Mulvey, E.P.Gardner, W.The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. JAMA 1993;269:1007–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNiel, D.Binder, R.L.Screening for risk of inpatient violence, validation of an actuarial tool. Law Hum Behav 1994;18:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNiel, D.Gregory, A.L.Lam, J.M.Binder, R.L.Sullivan, G.R.Utility of decision support tools for assessing acute risk of violence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:945–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, J.Steadman, H.J.Silver, E.Appelbaum, P.Robbins, P.C.Mulvey, E.Rethinking risk assessment: The McArthur study of mental disorder and violence New YorkOxford University Press 2001Google Scholar
Nicholls, T.L.Ogloff, J.R.P.Douglas, K.S.Research report. Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: The HCR-20, PCL:SV, and VSC. Behav Sci Law 2004;22:127–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogloff, J.R.P.Daffern, M.The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression; an instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients. Behav Sci Law 2006;24:799–813CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steadman, H.Mulvey, E.Monahan, J.Robbins, P.Appelbaum, P.Grisso, T.et al.Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:393–401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinert, T.Prediction of inpatient violence. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003;106:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D.Bindman, J.Slade, M.Holloway, F.Rosen, A.Thornicroft, G.Clinical Assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): the development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice. J Ment Health 2004; 569–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violence Risk Screening-10 (V-RISK-10). http://www.forensic-psychiatry.no (accessed on 10 June 2008).Google Scholar
Wootton, L.Buchanan, A.Leese, M.Tyrer, P.Burns, T.Creed, F.et al.Violence in psychosis: estimating the predictive validity of readily accessible clinical information in a community sample. Schizophr Res 2008;101(1–3):176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.