Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:27:34.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doctors’ and nurses’ use of expectancy effects in clinical practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

S. Vambheim
Affiliation:
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department Of Psychology, Tromsø, Norway
M. Bystad
Affiliation:
University Hospital of North Norway, Department Of Geriatric Psychiatry, Tromsø, Norway
J. Kirkøen
Affiliation:
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department Of Psychology, Tromsø, Norway
P. Aslaksen
Affiliation:
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department Of Psychology, Tromsø, Norway
R. Wynn*
Affiliation:
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department Of Clinical Medicine, Tromsø, Norway
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Positive treatment expectations among patients are associated with reduced symptoms and reduced negative emotions, stress and anxiety. Patient expectations may be influenced by practitioners who focus on increasing positive treatment effects and reducing psychological and physiological stress.

Objectives

This study examined clinicians’ self-reported utilization of expectancy effects as additive effects to active treatments.

Methods

We applied a questionnaire to investigate clinicians’ utilization of patients´ treatment expectations. The items mapped reasons for increasing patient expectations, ways through which this was done, the frequency and efficiency of increasing expectations, and the understanding of underlying mechanisms of increasing patient expectations. Nurses (N=84) and medical doctors (N=49) employed in general practitioners’ offices, hospitals, nursing homes and home health care services, responded anonymously.

Results

When asked if they had tried to influence patient’s expectations to achieve an additive effect to active treatment, 71.2% reported that they had done so at least one time over the last year, 18.5% at least once per month, 16.9% at least once per week and 32.3% at a daily basis. Neither profession nor practitioner sex influenced these results. The two most frequently reported reasons for trying to influence expectations were to increase the effect of an active treatment and to calm the patient. Optimism and empathy were the two most frequently reported ways through which expectations were influenced.

Conclusions

The strategy of utilizing expectation effects as additive effects to active treatment was frequent among the respondents. The main reported reasons were to increase treatment effects and reduce patients’ stress through expressing optimism and empathy.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.