Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:22:51.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of psychoanalytical training on professional performance in a sample of French speaking psychotherapists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A Dazord ,
P Gerin ,
JD Davis ,
ML Davis ,
N Aapro  and
J Thurin
A Dazord
Affiliation:
Script Inserm Hôpital Saint-Jean de Dieu, 69008Lyon
P Gerin
Affiliation:
Script Inserm Hôpital Saint-Jean de Dieu, 69008Lyon
JD Davis
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, UK
ML Davis
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, UK
N Aapro
Affiliation:
Institutions Universitaires de Psychiatrie, Geneva, Switzerland
J Thurin
Affiliation:
AFPEP 59, rue Fontaine du Roi, 75011Paris, France
Get access

Summary

This study is part of a more extensive research conducted by a group of scientists from different countries, who have joined forces to conduct an international study on the development of the therapist, and to develop a novel instrument for therapists, the “Development of Psychotherapists’ Common Core Questionnaire” (CCQ). We report here the results based on the answers of a French-speaking sample to this questionnaire. Data were analyzed using univariate (non parametric tests) and multivariate analyses (Principal Component Analysis and Multiple Correspondence Analysis). The perceived effects of psychoanalytical training were examined. The therapists’ own perception on their current skills and the type of difficulties they experienced were very similar, whether or not they had received psychoanalytical training. However, striking and significant differences in coping strategies were observed between the two groups.

Keywords

psychotherapistenquirytrainingpsychoanalysis
Type
Focus on European Practice|Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , 1994 , pp. 211 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzecri, JPBenzecri, F. I: Analyse des correspondances, exposé élémentaire. La pratique de l’analyse des données. Dunod, 1980Google Scholar
Benzecri, JPet al. La taxinomie, T II: L’analyse des correspondances. L’Analyse des données. Dunod, 3° édit, 1979Google Scholar
Buchheim, PCierpka, MGitzinger, IKächele, HOrlinsky, DErfahrungen einer ersten Befragung von Psychotherapeuten mit der deutschen Versiob des “Common Core Questionnaire”. Texte zur psychotherapeutischen Fort- und Weiter-bildun Lindauer texte Buchheim, PCierpka, MSeifert, T, eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992Google Scholar
Davis, JElliott, RDavis, MBinns, MFrancis, VKelman, JSchröder, TDevelopment of a taxonomy of therapist difficulties: initial report. Br J Med Psychol 1957;60:109-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dazord, AGerin, PTerra, JLSali, AHochman, JInfluence des formations des soignants sur leur représentation de la maladie mentale. Psychol Méd 1989;21:1473-7Google Scholar
Gerin, PVignat, JPL’identité du psychothérapeute. ParisPUF, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, EDWidlÖcher, DL’identité du Psychanalyste. PUF, 1978Google Scholar
Leary, TInterpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press, 1957Google Scholar
Orlinsky, DGérin, PDavis, Jet al. SPR Collaborative Research Network: “International Study on the Development of Psychotherapists”. Background and Research Plan. 22nd annual Conference of Society of Psychotherapy Research, Lyon, July 1991.Google Scholar
Siegel, SNonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Mc Graw-Hill: New York, 1955Google Scholar
Turkle, SPsychoanalytic Politics: Freud French Revolution. New York: Basic Books, 1978Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.