Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:24:21.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intolerance to neuroleptic drugs: the art of avoiding extrapyramidal syndromes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J Gerlach
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Biological Psychiatry, St Hans Hospital, Department P, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark
L Peacock
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Biological Psychiatry, St Hans Hospital, Department P, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark
Get access

Summary

Akathisia, dystonia, dyskinesia and parkinsonism, the four main categories of neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal syndromes (EPS), represent major disadvantages in antipsychotic therapy. In vulnerable patients, acute EPS may progress into potentially irreversible forms such as tardive dystonia and tardive dyskinesia. In the psychiatric clinic, these EPS are often insufficiently recognised or permitted to exist without treatment. In order to ensure a better EPS diagnosis, a simple examination procedure is described. EPS rating scales may serve as an aid in this process. Guidelines are given to prevent and treat EPS. Thus, EPS are best prevented by a course of neuroleptic medication involving as little antidopaminergic D2 effect as possible, including the use of the lowest effective dose (sometimes obtained by addition of a benzodiazepine or carbamazepine) and with antipsychotic drugs which produce low D2 receptor blockade. Treating EPS also consists of using the lowest effective dose and antipsychotics with a low D2 dopamine receptor occupancy. At present, clozapine is the only drug that produces antipsychotic benefits at doses that cause far less D2 receptor antagonism in the basal ganglia of the brain than that seen with standard neuroleptics; however, newer drugs, such as olanzepine, seroquel and sertindole, are on the way.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, TREEdwards, JGThe side-effects of antipsychotic drugs. I. CNS and Neuromuscular effects. In: Barnes, TREAntipsychotic Drugs and Their Side-Effects London, San Diego, NY, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Neuroscience Perspectives Academic Press, Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers, 1993 213–4710.1016/B978-0-12-079035-7.50021-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, DEClozapine: neuroleptic-induced EPS and tardive dyskinesia. Psychopharmacology 1989; (suppl): 47–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, DENeuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal syndromes and tardive dyskinesia. Schizophr Res 1991; 4: 109–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, DEPovlsen, UJMaidahl, BGerlach, JNeuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia and parkinsonism: Changes during several years of continuing treatment. Psychopharmacol Bull 1985; 22: 250–3Google Scholar
Farde, LNordström, ALWiesel, FAPauli, SHalldin, CSedvall, GPosition emission tomographic analysis of central D1 and D2 dopamine receptor occupancy in patients treated with classical neuroleptics and clozapine. Relation to extrapyramidal side effects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49: 538–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, JOral versus depot administration of neuroleptics in relapse prevention Acta Psychiat Scand 1994; 89 (suppl 382): 28–3210.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb05862.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, JKorsgaard, SClemmesen, Pet al.The St Hans Rating Scale for extrapyramidal syndromes: reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; 87: 244–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, LSolgaard, TLublin, HGerlach, J Clozapine versus typical antipsychotics. A retro-and prospective study of extrapyramidal side effects. Psychopharmacology, in press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.