Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:00:44.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the Living Will an interesting way to determine themselves? Qualitative research about considerations said by oncologists in a university service care in Southeast Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

E. Turato*
Affiliation:
State University of Campinas, Medical Psychology And Psychiatry, Campinas, Brazil
J.R. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
State University of Campinas, Medical Psychology And Psychiatry, Campinas, Brazil
C. Santos
Affiliation:
State University of Campinas, Medical Psychology And Psychiatry, Campinas, Brazil
A.C. Bispo
Affiliation:
State University of Campinas, Medical Psychology And Psychiatry, Campinas, Brazil
C.S. Lima
Affiliation:
State University of Campinas, Medical Psychology And Psychiatry, Campinas, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

What does the physician think in his/her intimacy about clinical care for when his/her death would be near? Living Will is a type of advance directive with the aim to guarantee the testator’s autonomy when faced with death. Particularly oncologists are often faced with human finitude. Their delicate work does not protect them from the possible anguish of thinking and preparing for their own death. It is pertinent to know the psychic mechanisms normally present in the management of this expectation.

Objectives

To explore symbolic representations of oncologists such as referred to the possible elaboration of their own Living Will.

Methods

Qualitative design. Eight participants, clinicians, sample closed by theoretical saturation of information. Semidirected interviews in-depth were conducted online during the pandemic, fully transcribed. Technique of Clinical-Qualitative Content Analysis used for data treatment to generate categories of discussion. The authors search for core meanings in the corpus of interviews, after free-floating readings.

Results

Three categories emerged from the material: Living Will: postponing the decision in order to not anticipate death; From Rationalization Mechanism to Intellectualization: a more sophisticated defensive strategy; Loss of Autonomy: the doctor’s belief while to feel him/herself patient.

Conclusions

(1) Even with all scientific knowledge, respondents have archaic thoughts on defining advance directives as healthy individuals would mean rushing time of their death. (2) Resistance of these professionals to an imagined scenario of end reveals underlying anguish in writing of living will. (3) There is fear of losing autonomy when they do not know how their Living Will can be seen.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.