Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:34:47.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry: repeated emergency admissions to inpatient care during a 1-year follow-up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

O Saarento
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, FIN-90210Oulu, Finland
L Christiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Copenhagen County Hospital, Glusrrup, Denmark
G Göstas
Affiliation:
Orsa und Älvdalen Primary Health Care Center
H Hakko
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, FIN-90210Oulu, Finland
O Lönnerberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
S Muus
Affiliation:
Roskilde County Hospital, Fjorden, Roskilde, Denmark
M Sandlund
Affiliation:
Deparrment of Psychiatry, University of Umeå, sweden
T Öiesvold
Affiliation:
Salten Psychiatric Center, Nordland Psychiatric Hospital, Badö, Norway
L Hansson*
Affiliation:
Departmenr of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden
*
*In addition to the authors the following persons are participating in the research group: Denmark: Copenhagen, HR Vinding and M Kastrup; Roskilde, A Lindhardt; Finland: Oulu, E Väisänen; Sweden: Stockholm, T Zandrén.
Get access

Summary

The emergency admissions to hospital care in six psychiatric services in four Nordic countries were explored as a part of a Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry. One year treated incidence cohorts were used, with the total cohort comprising 2,454 patients. Of the 803 patients who were admitted to inpatient care during a 1-year follow-up, 82% had at least one emergency admission and 23% repeated emergency admissions. The definition for the repeated emergency admissions was at least two admissions during the follow-up. The mean length of stay in emergency inpatient care per treatment episode for this patient subgroup was 28 days. Their emergency inpatient episodes constituted 30% of all inpatient days during the follow-up. However, the variations between the services and diagnostic subgroups were large. The results of a logistic regression analysis indicated that the following variables predicted repeated emergency admissions: inpatient care at index contact, emergency outpatient contacts or no planned hospital admissions during the follow-up, psychiatric service, age under 45 years, and a diagnosis of psychosis, personality disorder or dependency. The repeated emergency admissions were related to the existence of a special service unit for abusers but not to the rates of outpatient staff or acute beds in the services, to geographical distances, referral practice or existence of emergency services.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, DGPractical Statistics for Medical Research London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.Google Scholar
Bassuk, EGerson, SChronic Crisis Patients: A Discrete Clinical Group Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137: 15131517Google ScholarPubMed
Ellison, JMBlum, NRBarsky, AJFrequent Repeaters in a Psychiatric Emergency Service Hosp Community Psychiatry 1989; 40: 958960Google Scholar
Gerson, SBassuk, EPsychiatric Emergencies: An Overview Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137: 111Google ScholarPubMed
Hansson, LÖiesvold, TGöstas, GKastrup, MLönnerberg, OThe Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry. I: Treated point prevalence and characteristics of the psychiatric services Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995; 91: 4147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, LVinding, HRMuus, SGöstas, GSaarento, OSandlund, Met al.The Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry. Clinical and social patient characteristics predicting use of psychiatric services during a 1-year follow-up study Nord J Psychiatry 1996; 50: 433442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, LChristiansen, LSandlund, MGöstas, GZandrén, TLindhardt, Aet al.The Nordic Comparative Study on Sectorised Psychiatry. Part V. Contact rates, contact patterns and care level at index contact Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1997; 32: 1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havassy, BEHopkin, JTFactors Predicting Utilisation of Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Services by Frequently Hospitalised Patients Hosp Community Psychiatry 1989; 40: 820823Google Scholar
Haywood, TWKravitz, HMGrossman, LSCavanaugh, JLJDavis, JMLewis, DAPredicting the “revolving door” phenomenon among patients with schizophrenic, schizoaffective, and affective disorders Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 856861Google ScholarPubMed
Hillard, JRSlomowitz, MDeddens, JDeterminants of Emergency Psychiatric Admission for Adolescents and Adults Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145: 14161419Google ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, PDeavoll, BAbernethy, PPsychiatric service use: a cohort study of first attenders Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992; 86: 313319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosmer, DWLemeshow, SApplied logistic regression New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfner, Hvan der Heiden, WThe Mannheim ProjectKnudsen, HCThornicroft, GMental Health Service Evaluation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. 9092Google Scholar
Kastrup, MWho became revolving door patients? Findings from a nation-wide cohort of first time admitted psychiatric patients Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987; 76: 8088CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korkeila, JAKarlsson, HKujari, HFactors predicting readmissions in personality disorders and other nonpsychotic illnesses Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995; 92: 138144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, TJoyce, PRThe new revolving-door patients: results from a national cohort of first admissions Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990; 82: 130135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, MHA Psychiatric Emergency Clinic: A Study of Attendances Over Six Months Br J Psychiatry 1983; 143: 460466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norusis, MJSPSS for Windows: Advanced statistics Chicago: SPSS Inc; 1994.Google Scholar
Oyewumi, LKOdejide, OKazarian, SSPsychiatric Emergency Services in a Canadian City: 1. Prevalence and Patterns of Use Can J Psychiatry 1992; 37: 9195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarento, OÖiesvold, TGöstas, GLindhardt, ASandlund, MVinding, HRet al.The Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry. II. Resources of the psychiatric services and treated incidence Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995; 92: 202207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarento, OFactors related to treated incidence in psychiatric services and utilisation of psychiatric inpatient care. A Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry Thesis vol 437 1996 Acta Universitatis Ouluensis OuluGoogle Scholar
Saarento, OHansson, LSandlund, MGöstas, GKastrup, MMuus, Set al.The Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry. Utilisation of psychiatric hospital care related to amount and allocation of resources to psychiatric services Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1996; 31: 327335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarento, ONieminen, PHakko, HIsohanni, MVäisänen, EUtilisation of psychiatrie in-patient care among new patients in a comprehensive community-care system: a 3-year follow-up study Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996; 95: 132139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarento, OÖiesvold, TGöstas, GChristiansen, LWLindhardt, ALönnerberg, Oet al.The Nordic comparative study on sectorised psychiatry. III. Accessibility of psychiatric services, degree of urbanization and treated incidence Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1996; 31: 259265Google Scholar
Way, BBEvans, MEBanks, SMFactors Predicting Referral to Inpatient or Outpatient Treatment From Psychiatric Emergency Services Hosp Community Psychiatry 1992; 43: 703708Google ScholarPubMed
WHO, Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death Geneva: WHO; 1977.Google Scholar
Woogh, CMA Cohort Through the Revolving Door Can J Psychiatry 1986; 31: 214221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.