Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:33:14.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A novel protocol to assess dual task cost as a potential measure of cognitive reserve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

A. Oliveira-Maia*
Affiliation:
Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Neuropsychiatry Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
I. Coelho
Affiliation:
Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Neuropsychiatry Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
J.B. Barahona-Corrêa
Affiliation:
Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Neuropsychiatry Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
V. Paixão
Affiliation:
Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Lisbon, Portugal
M. Camacho
Affiliation:
Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Neuropsychiatry Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
R.M. Costa
Affiliation:
Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Lisbon, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Methods for measuring cognitive reserve (CR) are limited and controversial. Dual task cost (DTC) paradigms, assessing links between gait and cognition, are increasingly regarded as robust measures of CR.

Objectives

Here, we aimed to validate a simplified methodology for a DTC paradigm in healthy volunteers for application in clinical settings as a measurement of CR.

Methods

We tested if subtracting by 7's (cognitive task) while walking (motor task) induced a DTC in a sample of 39 healthy young adults. For the cognitive task, we recorded the number of correct and incorrect subtractions, as well as the latency between subtractions. Gait parameters were recorded on a tri-axial accelerometer fixed to the left ankle. Both tasks were performed separately (single task) and simultaneously (double task) to assess the DTC. A battery for neuropsychological assessment and questionnaires to assess quality of life and affective symptoms were also applied, to measure possible correlations with the DTC.

Results

Subtracting 7's while walking caused significant changes in gait parameters and in cognitive task performance. A significant decrease in the autocorrelation of the accelerometer signal during the dual task was also found (DTC = 37.92 ± 7.56%; P < 0.0001). This measure has not been previously used and may be a more sensitive measure of the dual task induced disturbance of the gait periodic signal pattern. Correlations between DTC and quality of life, affective or cognitive measures were not significant.

Conclusion

Our study provides an effective, portable and non-intrusive DTC experimental protocol that can be easily applied in clinical settings.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
FC16
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.