Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:53:57.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality traits and emotion recognition abilities in two samples of Romanian medical students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

L. Dehelean
Affiliation:
University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes”, Neuroscience, Timisoara, Romania
R.S. Romosan
Affiliation:
University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes”, Neuroscience, Timisoara, Romania
M.O. Manea
Affiliation:
University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes”, Neuroscience, Timisoara, Romania

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Personality traits and social cognition are important predictors for the future performance, success, adjustment and mental health of medical students.

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to assess and compare personality traits and emotion recognition abilities of two medical student samples: general medicine (GM) and general nursing (GN) students.

Methods

The study was conducted between 2015–2016 on 173 Romanian medical undergraduates from the Timisoara “Victor Babes” university of medicine and pharmacy: sixth-year GM students (n = 96) and fourth-year GN students (n = 83). Personality traits were evaluated with the 60-item NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Emotion recognition abilities were assessed with the revised version of the “reading the mind in the eyes” test.

Results

The GM sample consisted of 31 (32.3%) males and 65 (67.7%) females, with a mean age of 24.65 years (SD = 1.81). The GN sample was comprised of 13 (15.7%) males and 70 (84.3%) females, with a mean age of 23.84 years (SD = 2.12). Overall, compared with female students, males gave considerably less correct answers in the “eyes test” (P = 0.002) and had lower mean scores in “agreeableness” (P = 0.005). GM students scored significantly higher than GN students in “neuroticism” (P = 0.01), obtained lower mean scores in “agreeableness” (P = 0.015) and had poorer emotion recognition abilities (P = 0.03) than their GN colleagues.

Conclusions

GN students appear to be more emotionally stable and with better emotion recognition abilities than GM students. Results of the present study represent a starting point for other studies that may use larger and diverse student samples.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster Viewing: Others
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.