Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:31:58.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A preliminary report on the effect of a psychosocial and educative rehabilitation programme on quality of life and symptomatology in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

S Browne ,
M Roe ,
A Lane ,
M Gervin ,
M Morris ,
A Kinsella ,
C Larkin  and
E O'Callaghan
S Browne
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
M Roe
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
A Lane
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
M Gervin
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
M Morris
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
A Kinsella
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
C Larkin
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
E O'Callaghan*
Affiliation:
The Theodore and Vada Stanley Research Unit for Serious Mental Illness, Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin
*
*Correspondence and reprints.
Get access

Summary

Individuals with schizophrenia who participated in a psychosocial and educative rehabilitation programme showed a 46% improvement in quality of life in the absence of any significant change in symptom severity. In contrast, there was no significant change in quality of life for individuals who continued with supportive rehabilitation. Our preliminary findings highlight the ‘quality of life’ benefits of psychosocial and educative rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia who are clinically stable and living in the community.

Keywords

schizophreniarehabilitationquality of lifepositive and negative symptoms
Type
Original articles
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 11 , Issue 8 , 1996 , pp. 386 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, NCThe Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa, 1983Google Scholar
Andreasen, NCThe Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa, 1984Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association 3rd ed, revised Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Washington DC: APA, 1987Google Scholar
Anthony, WACohen, MRDanley, KSThe psychiatric rehabilitation approach as applied to vocational rehabilitationCiardiello, JAVocational Rehabilitation of Persons with Prolonged Psychiatric Disorders Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988 224–248Google Scholar
Atkinson, JMCoia, DAHarper Gilmour, WHarper, JP. The impact of education groups for people with schizophrenia on social functioning and quality of life. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168: 199–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellack, AS. Cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia: Is it possible? Is it necessary?. Schizophr Bull 1992; 18: 43–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, SRoe, MLane, Aet al.Quality of life in schizophrenia: relationship to sociodemographic factors, symptomatology and tardive dyskinesia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996; 94: 118–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambon, OEckjnan, TTrinh, ALiberman, RPMarie-Cardine, M. Social skills training as a way of improving quality of life among chronic mentally ill patients: presentation of a theoretical model. Eur Psychiatry 1992; 7: 213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, JM. Comparative doses and costs of antipsychotic medication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 858–860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, SCSchooler, NRHogarty, GERoper, M. Prediction of relapse in schizophrenic outpatients treated with drug and sociotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1977; 34: 171–185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, DWHanion, ETCarpenter, WT Jr. The Quality of Life Scale: an instrument for rating the schizophrenic deficit syndrome. Schizophr Bull 1984; 10: 388–398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogarty, GEGoldberg, SCSchooler, NRthe Collaborative Study Group Drug and sociotherapy in the aftercare of schizophrenic patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974; 31: 609–618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogarty, GEAnderson, CMReiss, DJ, et al.Family psychoeducation, social skills training and maintenance chemotherapy in the aftercare treatment of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48: 340–347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogarty, GE. Prevention of relapse in chronic schizophrenic patients. J Clin Psychiatry 1993; 3 (suppl): 18–23Google Scholar
Meltzer, HYBurnett, SBastani, BRamirez, LF. Effects of six months of clozapine treatment on the quality of life of chronic schizophrenic patients. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 1990; 41: 892–897Google ScholarPubMed
Wallace, CJ. Functional assessment in rehabilitation. Schizophr Bull 1986; 4: 604–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.