Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:19:58.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rating depressed patients: observer- vs self-assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

H.J. Möller
H.J. Möller*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336Munich, Germany
Get access

Summary

An overview of the rating scale literature reveals that the clinician now has many validated rating scales to choose from to assess his patient's condition. In general terms, it is the observer-rating scales that should be used as the principal outcome criterion in depressive disorders, both in general practice and in drug-related trials. However, self-rating scales can provide important additional information for therapy evaluation. They also provide a measure of the patient's perception of his own illness and recovery, which is not possible with observer ratings. Self-rating scales are designed for frequent use and to be sensitive to the change brought about by therapy and its time course. Observer ratings can also show sensitivity for change, and these compare well with the self-rating measures.

The multimethod approach, including both observer- and self-rating scales, and covering different domains such as psychopathological symptoms, social functioning, etc., is the preferred method for assessing patients. Using this approach, clinicians are able to build up complete profiles of their patients' illnesses and make full assessments of the efficacy of treatment and their return to normal social functioning.

Keywords

observer-rating scalesquality of lifeself-rating scalessocial functioning
Type
Review
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , May 2000 , pp. 160 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R.C.BMeasurement of feelings using visual analog scales Proc R Soc M 62 1969 989–993Google Scholar
Asberg, MMontgomery, S.APerris, CSchalling, DSedvall, GA comprehensive psychopathological rating scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 272 Suppl 1978 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, JCoppen, AA comparison between the Hamilton Rating Scale and Beck Inventory in the measurement of depression Br J Psychiatry 128 1976 486–489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, MWell-being and life satisfaction as components of quality of life in mental disordersKatschnig, HFreeman, HSartorious, NQuality of life in mental disorders ChichesterJohn Wiley & Sons 1997 31–42Google Scholar
Bech, PRating scales for affective disorders: their validity and consistency Acta Psychiatr Scand 95 Suppl 1981 11–91Google Scholar
Bech, PSymptoms and assessment of depressionPaykel, E.SHandbook of affective disorders LondonChurchill Livingstone 1992 3–14Google Scholar
Bech, PIntroduction: Rating scales versus DSM-III-R and ICD-10Bech, PRating scales for psychopathology, health status and quality of life LondonSpringer-Verlag 1993 30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, PQuality of life instruments in depression Eur Psychiatry 2 1997 194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, PAllerup, PGram, L.FReisby, NRosenburg, RJacobesen, OThe Hamilton Depression Scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models Acta Psychistr Scand 63 1981 290–299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, PGram, L.FDein, EJacobsen, OViter, JBolwig, T.GQuantitative rating of depressive states Acta Psychiatr Scand 51 1975 161–170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, PGram, L.FReisby, NRafaelsen, O.JThe WHO depression scale. Relationship to the Newcastle scales Acta Psychiatr Scand 62 1980 140–153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, PKastrup, MRafaelsen, O.JMinicompendium of rating scales for anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia with corresponding DSM-III syndromes Acta Psychiatry Scand Suppl 326 1986 1–37Google Scholar
Bech, PRafaelson, O.JThe Melancholia Scale: development, consistency, validity, and utilitySartorius, NBan, T.AAssessment of depression BerlinSpringer-Verlag 1986 259–269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, PRafaelson, O.JThe use of rating scales exemplified by a comparison of the Hamilton and the Bech-Rafalelson Melancholia Scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 62 Suppl 285 1980 128–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A.TDepression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects PhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania Press 1967Google Scholar
Beck, A.TWard, C.HMendelson, MMock, JErbaugh, JAn inventory for measuring depression Arch Gen Psychiatry 4 1961 53–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosc, MDubini, APolin, VDevelopment and validation of a social functioning scale, the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 7 Suppl 1 1997 S57–S70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, J.TWylie, L.TZiegler, VValidity of the Zung self-rating depression scale Br J Psychiatry 132 1978 381–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, B.JFielding, J.MBlashki, T.GDepression rating scales Arch Gen Psychiatry 28 1973 361–366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, BFeinberg, MSmouse, P.ERawson, SGreden, J.FThe Carroll rating scale for depression: development, reliability and validity Br J Psychiatry 138 1981 194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, A.WCairns, V.EDesign, development and use of a standardized interview to assess social maladjustment and dysfunction in community studies Psychol M 8 1987 589–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A.WThe personality and social network adjustment scale Hum Rel 1 1968 85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, P.EJosephs, P.OThe Community Adaptation Schedule and the California Psychological Inventory: a validation study with college students Community Ment Health J 6 1970 366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corruble, ELegrande, J.MZvenigorowski, HGuret, CGuelfi, D.JConcordance between self-report and clinician's assessment of depression J Psychiatr Res 33 1999 457–650CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domken, MScott, JKelly, PWhat factors predict discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression? J Affect Disord 31 1994 253–259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubini, ABosc, MPolin, VNoradrenaline-selective versus serotonin-selective antidepressant therapy: differential effects on social functioning J Psychopharmacol 11 Suppl 1997 S17–S23Google ScholarPubMed
Dubini, ABosc, MPolin, VDo noradrenaline and serotonin differentially affect social motivation and behaviour? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 7 Suppl 1 1997 S49–S55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupuy, H.JThe Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) indexWenger, N.KMattson, M.EFurberg, C.DElison, JAssessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies New YorkLe Jacq Publishing 1984 184–188Google Scholar
Endicott, JSpitzer, R.LFleiss, J.LCohen, JThe Global Assessment Scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance Arch Gen Psychiatry 33 1976 766–771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faltermaier, TWittchen, H.UEllmann, RLässle, RThe Social Interview Schedule (SIS) – content, structure and reliability Soc Psychiatry 20 1985 115–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faravelli, CAlbanesi, GPoli, EAssessment of depression: a comparison of rating scales J Affect Disord 11 1986 245–253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, MCarroll, B.JSmouse, P.ERawson, S.GThe Carroll rating scale for depression. III. Comparison with other rating instruments Br J Psychiatry 138 1981 205–209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, R.AMitchell, JKocsis, J.HRetreatment for relapse following desipramine discontinuation in dysthymia Am J Psychiatry 152 1995 926–928Google ScholarPubMed
Gurland, B.JYorkston, N.JStone, A.RFrank, J.DFleiss, J.LThe structured interview to assess maladjustment (SSIAM). Description, rationale and development Arch Gen Psychiatry 27 1972 259–264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurland, B.JYorkston, N.JGoldberg, KFleiss, J.LSloane, R.BCristol, A.HThe structured interview to assess maladjustment (SSIAM). Factor analysis, reliability, and validity Arch Gen Psychiatry 27 1972 264–267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, WECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology revised MarylandNational Institute of Mental Health 1976Google Scholar
Hamilton, MA rating scale for depression J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23 1960 56–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, MDevelopment of a rating scale for primary depressive illness Br J Clin Psychol 6 1967 278–296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, MComparative value of rating scales Br J Clin Pharmacol 1 Suppl 1 1976 58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooijer, CZitman, F.GGriez, EVan Tilburg, WWillemse, ADinkgreve, M.A.H.MThe Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS): changes in scores as a function of training and version used J Affect Disord 22 1991 21–2910.1016/0165-0327(91)90079-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J.RO'Hara, M.WRehm, L.PMeasurement of depression in clinical trials: an overview J Clin Psychiatry 43 1982 85–88Google ScholarPubMed
Hunt, S.MMc Kenna, S.PThe QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression Health Policy 22 1992 307–319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katschnig, HHow useful is the concept of quality of life in psychiatry?Katschnig, HFreeman, HSartorious, NQuality of life in mental disorders ChichesterJohn Wiley & Sons 1997 3–16Google Scholar
Kocsis, J.HFrances, A.JVoss, CMason, B.JMann, J.JSweeny, JImipramine and social vocational adjustment in chronic depression Am J Psychiatry 145 1988 997–999Google ScholarPubMed
Lang, FPellet, JPostic, YBeau, J.MLancrenon, SBlanchon, Y et al. Widlocher's Depressive Retardation Scale and Montgomery-Asberg's Depression Rating Scale: an inter-rater study Eur Psychiatry 6 1991 47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leader, J.BKlein, D.NSocial adjustment in dysthymia, double depression and episodic major depression J Affect Disord 37 1996 91–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leff, JWhose life is it anyway? Quality of life for long-stay patients discharged from psychiatric hospitalKatschnig, HFreeman, HSartorious, NQuality of life in mental disorders ChichesterJohn Wiley & Sons 1997 241–252Google Scholar
Lorr, MAssessing psychotic behavior by IMPSPichot, POlivier-Martin, RPsychological measurements in psychopharmacology. Modern problems in pharmacopsychiatry BaselKarger 1974 50–63Google Scholar
Maier, WAlbus, MBuller, RNutzinger, DShera, DBech, PSelf and observer assessment in anxiolytic drug trials: a comparison of their validity Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 240 1990 103–108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massana, JReboxetine versus fluoxetine: an overview of efficacy and tolerability J Clin Psychiatry 59 Suppl 4 1998 8–10Google ScholarPubMed
Massana, JMöller, H.JBurrows, G.DReboxetine: a double-blind comparison with fluoxetine in major depressive disorder Int Clin Psychopharmacol 14 1999 73–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHorney, C.AWare, J.ERaczek, A.EThe Mos 36 item short-form health survey SF36: II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Med Care 31 1993 247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, H.JOutcome criteria in antidepressant drug trials: self rating versus observer rating scales Pharmacopsychiatry 24 1991 71–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möller, H.JVon Zerssen, DSelf-rating procedures in the evaluation of antidepressants. Review of the literature and results of our studies Psychopathology 28 1995 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S.AReboxetine: additional benefits to the depressed patient J Psychopharmacol 11 Suppl 4 1997 S9–S15Google ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, S.AAsberg, MA new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change Br J Psychiatry 134 1979 382–389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nierenberg, A.AGrossbard, S.JFava, MRosenbaum, J.FSocial adjustment does not predict depressive relapse during continuation fluoxetine therapy J Affect Disord 34 1995 73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paykel, E.SNorton, K.R.WSelf-report and clinical interview in the assessment of depressionSartorius, NBan, T.AAssessment of depression New YorkSpringer 1986 356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusoff, B.AKlerman, G.LPaykel, E.SConcordance between clinical assessments and patients' self-report in depression Arch Gen Psychiatry 26 1972 546–552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pukrop, RMöller, H.JSaβ, HSauer, HKlosterkötter, JCzernik, A et al. Das Konstrukt Lebensqualität: Metaanalytische Validierung und die Entwicklung eines modularen Erhebungssystems Nervenarzt 70 1999 41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff, L.SThe CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population Appl Psychol Measurement 1 1977 385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, A.JGiles, D.ESchlesser, M.AFulton, C.LWeissenburger, JBurns, CThe inventory for depressive symptomatology (IDS): preliminary findings Psychiatry Res 18 1986 65–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snaith, PWhat do depression rating scales measure? selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Br J Psychiatry 163 1993 293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souêtre, EMartin, PLozet, HMonteban, HQuality of life in depressed patients: comparison of fluoxetine and major tricyclic antidepressants Int Clin Psychopharmacol 11 1996 45–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.LEndicott, JRobins, EResearch diagnostic criteria. Rationale and reliability Arch Gen Psychiatry 35 1978 773–782CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinmeyer, E.MMöller, H.JFacet theoretic analysis of the Hamilton-D scale J Affect Disord 25 1992 53–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Zerssen, DClinical Self-Rating Scales (CSRS) of the Munich Psychiatric Information System (PSYCHIS München)Sartorius, NBan, T.AAssessment of depression 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin270–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Zerssen, Din collaboration with Koeller D-M. Klinische Selbstbeurteilungs-Skalen (KSb-S) aus dem Münchener Psychiatrischen Informations-System (PSYCHIS München), Manuale. (a) Allgemeiner Teil; (b) Die Beschwerden-Liste; (c) Paranoid-Depressiovitäts-Skala, Depressiovitäts-Skala; (d) Die Befindlichkeitis-Skala WeinheimBelz Test 1976Google Scholar
Ware, J.ESherbourne, C.DThe MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) Med Care 30 1992 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, M.MThe assessment of social adjustment Arch Gen Psychiatry 32 1975 357–365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M.MBothwell, SAssessment of social adjustment by patient self-report Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976 1111–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, M.MKlerman, G.LPaykel, E.STreatment effects on the social adjustment of depressed patients Arch Gen Psychiatry 30 1974 771–778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M.MSholomskas, DJohn, KThe assessment of social adjustment Arch Gen Psychiatry 38 1981 1250–1258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M.MPaykel, E.SSeigel, RKlerman, G.LThe social role performance of depressed women: comparisons with a normal group Am J Orthopsychiatr 41 1971 390–405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whalley, DMcKenna, S.PMeasuring quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety PharmacoEconomics 8 1995 305–315CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zung, W.W.KDurham, N.CA self-rating depression scale Arch Gen Psychiatry 12 1965 61–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.