Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:26:59.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rationale for BPRS use in routine clinical practice: quantitative assessment of psychopathology, consistent with clinical sense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

R Eisele
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie I, Institutions Universitaires de Psychiatrie
M Gex-Fabry
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherche Clinique, Institutions Universitaires de Psychiatrie
AE Balant-Gorgia
Affiliation:
Unité de Monitoring Thérapeutique, Institutions Universitaires de Psychiatrie, Genève, Switzerland
L Balant
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherche Clinique, Institutions Universitaires de Psychiatrie
G Garrone
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie I, Institutions Universitaires de Psychiatrie
Get access

Summary

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is expected to provide a valuable instrument for routine evaluation of the patient's status and correct interpretation of concentrations measured during therapeutic monitoring of antipsychotic drugs. Inpatient files were searched for information relative to acute episodes and BPRS items were scored every 10 days until discharge from the hospital according to a retrospective scheme. Eighty patients were included, who met DSM III criteria for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Clusters of symptoms that tend to appear together were identified through principal components analysis and are in keeping with factors described previously. Differences with respect to diagnosis further suggest that such clusters convey clinically relevant information. The time course of haloperidol action was also investigated: an average 51 % improvement was observed over the first 10 days, while the proportion of patients showing a 50% or larger BPRS decrease at the time of discharge reached 90%. The prominent contribution of changes in positive, florid symptoms to global improvement is also described. Finally, association of clinical improvement with a shorter period of hospitalization is shown. These results indicate that the BPRS represents a level of abstraction compatible with the way clinicians communicate and that its introduction into routine practice may allow for better description of the course of illness

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, NC (1985) Positive vs negative schizophrenia: a critical evaluation. Schizophr Bull 11, 380389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arndt, SAlliger, RJAndreasen, NC (1991) The distinction between positive and negative symptoms: the failure of a two-dimensional model. Br J Psychiatry 158, 317322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balant-Gorgia, AEEisele, RBalant, LGarrone, G (1984) Plasma haloperidol levels and therapeutic response in acute mania and schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci 234, 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchetti, GMorselli, PL (1978) Rapid and sensitive method for determination of haloperidol in human samples using nitrogen-phosphorus selective detection. J Chromatogr 153, 203209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breier, AWolkowitz, OMDoran, ARRoy, ABoronow, JHommer, DWPickar, D (1987) Neuroleptic responsivity of negative and positive symptoms in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 144, 15491555Google Scholar
Coryell, WKelly, MPerry, PJMiller, DD (1990) Haloperidol plasma levels and acute clinical change in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 10, 397402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, TJ (1981) Positive and negative schizophrenia symptoms and the role of dopamine. Br J Psychiatry 139, 251254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csernansky, JGYesavage, JAMaloney, WKaplan, J (1983) The treatment response scale: a retrospective method of assessing response to neuroleptics. Am J Psychiatry 140, 12101213Google ScholarPubMed
Dahl, SG (1986) Plasma level monitoring of antipsychotic drugs: clinical utility. Clinical Pharmacokin 11, 3661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dingemans, PMFrohn-de Winter, MLBleeker, JACRathod, P (1983) A cross-cultural study of reliability and factorial dimensions of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Psychopharmacology 80, 190191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froemming, JSLam, YWFJann, MWDavis, CM (1989) Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol. Clin Pharmacokinet 17, 396423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guelfi, GPFaustman, WOCsernansky, JG (1989) Independence of positive and negative symptoms in a population of schizophrenic patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 177, 285290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, W ed. (1976) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. DHEW Publ No 76-338, Nat Inst Health, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, HYSommers, AALuchins, DJ (1986) The effect of neuroleptics and other psychotropic drugs on negative symptoms in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 6, 329338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedopil, NPflieger, RRűther, E (1983) The prediction of acute response, remission and general outcome of neuroleptic treatment in acute schizophrenic patients. Pharmacopsychiatry 16, 201205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, JE (1974) The brief psychiatric rating scale in psychopharmacology research. In: Psychological Measurements in Psychopharmacology. Modern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry, vol 7(Pichot, P ed) Karger, Basel, 6778Google Scholar
Overall, JEHollister, LEPichot, P (1967) Major psychiatric disorders: a four-dimensional model. Arch Gen Psychiatry 16, 146151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, PJPfohl, BMKelly, MW (1988) The relationship of haloperidol concentrations to therapeutic response. J Clin Psychopharmacol 8, 3843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pichot, POverall, JESamuel-Lajeunesse, BDreyfus, JF (1969) Structure factorielle de I'échelle abrégée d'appreciation psychiatrique (BPRS). Rev Psychol Appl 19, 217232Google Scholar
Simpson, DMDavis, GC (1985) Measuring thought disorder with clinical rating scales in schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Res 15, 311318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Putten, TMarder, SRMintz, JPoland, RE (1988) Haloperidol plasma levels and clinical response: a therapeutic window relationship. Psychopharmacol Bull 24, 172175Google ScholarPubMed
Woggon, B (1980) Veränderungen der psychopathologischen Symptomatik während 20tätiger antidepressiver oder neuroleptischer Behandlung. Psychiatr Clin 13, 150164Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.