Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T09:11:23.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-world effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J. Tiihonen
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Kuopio, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
K. Wahlbeck
Affiliation:
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland
J. Lönnqvist
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland
T. Klaukka
Affiliation:
The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
J.P.A. Ioannidis
Affiliation:
Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
J. Volavka
Affiliation:
New York University, New York, NY, USA
J. Haukka
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Guidelines for treating schizophrenia are mainly based on randomized controlled trials of highly selected patients and limited follow-up. It is unknown how well these data can be applied to representative community settings, nor how the choice of antipsychotic medication affects the long-term outcome.

Methods

We evaluated a nation-wide cohort of consecutive subjects (n=2230) hospitalized in Finland for the first time due to schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder between January 1995 and December 2001. National central registers were used to study all-cause discontinuation rates, re-hospitalization rates, and mortality associated with monotherapy with the 10 most frequently used antipsychotic medications.

Results

Initial use of clozapine (propensity score adjusted relative risk 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.29), perphenazine depot (0.24, 0.13 to 0.47), and olanzapine (0.35, 0.18 to 0.71) were associated with the lowest rates of discontinuation for any reason when compared with oral haloperidol. Current use of perphenazine depot (0.32, 0.22 to 0.49), olanzapine (0.54, 0.41 to 0.71), and clozapine (0.64, 0.48 to 0.85) were associated with the lowest risk of rehospitalisation. Mortality was markedly raised in patients not taking antipsychotics (12.3, 6.0 to 24.1) and the risk of suicide was high (37.4, 5.1 to 276).

Conclusions

The effectiveness of first and second generation antipsychotics varies greatly in the community. Patients treated with perphenazine depot, clozapine, or olanzapine have a substantially lower risk of rehospitalisation or discontinuation of their initial treatment than do patients treated with haloperidol. Excess mortality is seen mostly in patients not using antipsychotic drugs.

Type
S34. Symposium: Long Term Treatment of Schizophrenia
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.