Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T00:36:45.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stigma: Dimensions and Correlates In A Multi-Ethnic Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Subramaniam*
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
E. Abdin
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
L. Picco
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
S. Pang
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
S. Shafie
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
J. Vaingankar
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
K.W. Kwok
Affiliation:
Nanyang technological institute, sociology, Singapore, Singapore
K. Verma
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
S.A. Chong
Affiliation:
Institute of mental health, research, Singapore, Singapore
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Mental health stigma is a multidimensional concept that encompasses many different themes and definitions. Public stigma is defined as the degree to which the general public holds negative views and discriminates against a specific group.

Objective

To understand the context and correlates of stigma in multi-ethnic Singapore.

Aims

The current study aimed to (i) explore the factor structure of the Depression Stigma Scale and the Social Distance Scale using an exploratory structural equation modelling approach and (ii) examine the correlates of the identified dimensions of stigma in the general population of Singapore.

Methods

Data for the current study came from a larger nation-wide cross-sectional study of mental health literacy conducted in Singapore. All respondents were administered the Personal and Perceived scales of the Depression Stigma Scale and the Social Distance scale to measure personal stigma and social distance respectively.

Results

The findings from the factor analysis revealed that personal stigma formed two distinct dimensions comprising “Weak-not-Sick” and “Dangerous/Unpredictable” components while social distance stigma items loaded strongly into a single factor. Those of Malay and Indian ethnicity, lower education, lower income status and those who were administered the depression and alcohol abuse vignette were significantly associated with higher weak-not-sick scores. Those of Indian ethnicity, 6 years of education and below, lower income status and those who were administered the alcohol abuse vignette were significantly associated with higher dangerous/unpredictable scores.

Conclusion

There is a need for well-planned and culturally relevant anti-stigma campaigns in this population.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV948
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.