Stress management versus cognitive restructuring: A randomized clinical study on traumatized refugees

Abstract

Background and aim

There is a lack of evidence regarding which kind of psychotherapy that is the most effective when treating traumatized refugees. Studies on the effect of psychotherapy among other patient groups with PTSD suggest a good effect using cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). The competence center for transcultural psychiatry (CTP) has specialized in the treatment of traumatized refugees. The objectives were to study the effect of CBT with a focus on either stress management or cognitive restructuring in a clinical sample of traumatized refugees with PTSD and to identify predictors for the treatment effect.

Methods

All patients (n = 143) referred to CTP from June 2011–March 2012 and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were offered to participate in the study. Participants were offered combined treatment with a psychiatrist (psycho-education and psychopharmacological treatment when needed) and a psychologist (CBT). The duration of the treatment was 6–7 months. The participants were randomized to either CBT with a focus on stress management or cbt with focus on cognitive restructuring. The primary outcome was PTSD measured by the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire.

Results

The results are presently being analyzed and will be presented at the congress.

Conclusions

Both research results and the clinical experience at CTP suggest, that cognitive restructuring is not always a useful tool and that stress reducing techniques could be more useful. This hypothesis was tested in the present study.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.