Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:26:31.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Virtual reality-based and eye tracking-assisted attention refocusing training for adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

B. Selaskowski*
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
L. Asché
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
A. Wiebe
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
K. Kannen
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
B. Aslan
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
D. Sanchéz
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
S. Lux
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
A. Philipsen
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
N. Braun
Affiliation:
University Hospital Bonn, Department Of Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Bonn, Germany
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Neurofeedback regimes in the treatment of adult ADHD are commonly EEG-based and have several shortcomings, including a weak signal-to-noise ratio, low transfer rates from laboratory to everyday environments and ambiguous evidence in respect to adequate brain signals of interest.

Objectives

To investigate, if an eyetracking-based real-time feedback in a virtual environment can enhance attentional performance, as measured by behavioral, EEG and eyetracking parameters.

Methods

Overall, n=18 adult patients with ADHD and n=18 healthy controls (HC) performed a continuous performance task (CPT) in a virtual seminar room, while distracting virtual events occurred. In case the participant’s gaze drifted away from the task an automated audiovisual feedback indicated the participant to refocus on the task. Three 20-minutes blocks were presented in counter-balanced order, that differed in respect to whether real feedback, sham feedback or no feedback was additionally provided.

Results

Mixed ANOVAs with within-subject factors ‘Condition’ (real feedback, sham feedback, no feedback) and ‘Phase’ (distractor phases vs. non-distractor phases) and a between-factor ‘Group’ (ADHD patients vs. HC) revealed better task performances in HC than ADHD patients in respect to omission errors (p = .023), mean reaction times (p = .042) and reaction time variabilities (p = .007; cf. Figure 1). Moreover, omission errors turned to be higher during distractor-present than distractor-absent trials (p = .007), especially in ADHD.

Figure 1.

CPT results. DP=distractor-phases, NDP=non-distractor-phases

Conclusions

While the virtual CPT turns out to discriminate well between patients with ADHD and HC, the behavioral results do not indicate an attentional performance enhancement based on the gaze-dependent feedback.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.