Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:34:52.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The World Health Organization somatoform disorders schedule. A preliminary report on design and reliability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A Janca ,
JD Burke Jr ,
M Isaac ,
KC Burke ,
JA Costa ,
E Silva ,
SW Acuda ,
AC Altamura ,
CR Chandrashekar  and
CT Miranda
...Show all authors
A Janca
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, World Health Organization1211Geneva 27, Switzerland
JD Burke Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Scott & White Clinic, Texas A and M University, College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
M Isaac
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, World Health Organization1211Geneva 27, Switzerland Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
KC Burke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Scott & White Clinic, Texas A and M University, College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
JA Costa
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, World Health Organization1211Geneva 27, Switzerland
E Silva
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, World Health Organization1211Geneva 27, Switzerland
SW Acuda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
AC Altamura
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
CR Chandrashekar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
CT Miranda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paula, Brazil
G Tacchini
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic, Milan University, Milan, Italy
Get access

Summary

The World Health Organization (WHO) Somatoform Disorders Schedule (SDS) is a highly standardized instrument for the assessment of somatoform disorders according to the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV). The SDS was produced in the framework of the WHO International Study of Somatoform Disorders and tested for its reliability in Brazil, India, Italy, the USA and Zimbabwe. A sample of 180 patients from general psychiatry, primary care and general medical settings were interviewed with the SDS within a three-day interval by nonclinician and clinician interviewers. The agreement between the two interviews was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and kappa statistic. The test-retest reliability of the SDS was found to be very good (the ICC for all the centres was 0.76; overall kappa value for SDS questions was 0.58; one-third of SDS questions had a kappa value of 0.60 or higher). The field test results of the SDS indicated that the instrument may be administered in larger studies by non-clinician interviewers without compromising the ability to document the prevalence of somatoform disorders in different cultures.

Keywords

somatizationsomatoform disordersassessmentinstrument
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 10 , Issue 8 , 1995 , pp. 373 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association 4th ed (DSM-IV)Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders Washington, DC: APA, 1994Google Scholar
Bartko, JJOn various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychol Bull 1976; 83: 762–5Google Scholar
Bartko, JJCarpenter, WTOn the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis 1976; 163: 307–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleiss, JLStatistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981Google Scholar
Isaac, MTacchini, GJanca, AScreener for somatoform disorders Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994Google Scholar
Janca, AIsaac, MCosta, ESilva, JAWorld Health Organization study of somatoform disorders — background and rationale Eur J Psychiatry 1995; in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, JRKoch, GGThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, LNHelzer, JECroughan, J, et al. The National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics and validity Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38: 381–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartorius, NWHO's work on the epidemiology of mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiat Epidemiol 1993; 28: 147–55Google ScholarPubMed
Tacchini, GJanca, A Recent advances in the diagnostic assessment of somatoform disorders. Presented at the Regional Symposium of the World Psychiatric Association and Italian Psychiatric Association: New Models in Psychiatry Palermo 1992Google Scholar
World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview — version for primary care (CIDI-PHC) Geneva: WHO, 1990Google Scholar
World Health Organization The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines Geneva: WHO, 1992Google Scholar
World Health Organization The composite international diagnostic interview (core version 1.1) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1993Google Scholar
World Health Organization WHO international study of somatoform disorders: study protocol and instruments Geneva: WHO, 1994aGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization Somatoform disorders schedule (SDS) Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994bGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.