Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:45:43.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade wars and the Slump

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2007

JAMES FOREMAN-PECK
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Wales, UK
ANDREW HUGHES HALLETT
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
YUE MA
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Get access

Abstract

Simulated optimum tariff policies to achieve plausible government targets show objective reasons for the failure of international trade cooperation during the Slump of 1929 to 1933. For the largest players, the US and UK, benefits from foreign cooperation were small or negative. France and Germany would have been the principal beneficiaries of international cooperative policies. Since cooperation on one issue, tariffs, was difficult, cooperation on many – through the cross-issue bargaining attempted at the 1933 London Conference- was well nigh impossible. Optimum coordination across policy instruments within one country, on the other hand, would have yielded high returns for policy. A corollary is that lack of internal coordination (poor domestic policies) was a more important cause of the Great Depression than failure to harmonise policies internationally.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)