Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:36:45.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A ‘European Memory of the Jewish Extermination’? Spain as a Methodological Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2012

Salvador Orti Camallonga
Salvador Orti Camallonga
Affiliation:
Downing College, University of Cambridge, UK. Email: so313@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to question academic assertions of a European memory of the Jewish extermination by using the Spanish case. Peculiar links between Spain and the Jewish genocide indicate that a common European story about the Jewish extermination cannot be taken for granted. On the contrary, I propose an alternative model focused on the transmission process and the actors that control it, namely national narratives, anti-Semitic rhetoric and, over the past few decades, ‘Holocaust mass media products’. Such an approach will not only provide useful insights about the perception of the Jewish extermination in countries outside the traditional academic spectrum on Holocaust studies, but will also portray Spain's self-image in a European perspective.

Type
Focus: European Civil Wars
Information
European Review , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , 04 September 2012 , pp. 475 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. This investigation will avoid the term ‘Holocaust’ and, instead, will employ ‘the Jewish extermination’, ‘the Jewish annihilation’ or similar terms. However, it seems necessary to explain this rationale in more detail, and for this purpose the study of Zev Garber and Bruce Zuckerman about the word ‘Holocaust’ is highly relevant. They indicate that ‘Holocaust’ comes from the Latin holocaustum, which originally derives from the Greek holokaustos, which means ‘something wholly burnt up’. According to Garber and Zuckerman, before the Second World War, ‘holocaust’ denoted a ‘religious sacrifice’, and after the conflict the elimination of the Jews was referred to as the ‘Nazi Final Solution on the Jewish Question’. Garber and Zuckerman have highlighted that it was the Romanian survivor Elie Wiesel who made this word popular during the 1950s, and the term would become frequently used during the Eichmann trial in 1961 and in the following two decades. Wiesel, as Garber and Zuckerman state, adopted the term with ‘unmistakable religious/sacrificial overtones’ and especially with the notion that the Jews were, like Abraham's son in Genesis 22, the ‘chosen victims’, the ‘only ones’, Israel. Similarly, as Garber and Zuckerman point out, the word ‘Shoah’ comes from biblical Hebrew and means ‘destruction, ruin’. Garber, Z. and Zuckerman, B. (1989) Why do we call the Holocaust ‘The Holocaust’? An inquiry into the psychology of labels. Modern Judaism, 9(2), 198–200. and 202–205. Due to these religious connotations, it seems inconvenient to use the terms ‘Holocaust’ and ‘Shoah’. The term ‘Jewish extermination’, on the contrary, avoids a narrow understanding of the destruction of the Jewish population as ‘only’ their physical elimination in Death Camps; the broader meaning that is implied by the term ‘Jewish extermination’ will allow this investigation to take into account more aspects surrounding the event when analysing its perception in Spain. I will, however, use ‘Holocaust representations’ or ‘Holocaust mass media’, for these terms do not define the nature of the annihilation of the European Jews.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Alexander, J.C. (2002) On the social construction of moral universals: the ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 43–50.Google Scholar
3.Judt, T. (2005) Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945 (London: William Heinemann), p. 804.Google Scholar
4.Levy, D. and Sznaider, N. (2002) Memory unbound. The Holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 93.Google Scholar
5.Levy, D. and Sznaider, N. (2002) Memory unbound. The Holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 92.Google Scholar
6.Rothberg, M. (2009) Multidirectional memory and the universalization of the Holocaust. In: J.C. Alexander (Ed.) Remembering the Holocaust. A Debate (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 124–133. A. Huyssen (2002) En Busca del Futuro Perdido: Cultura y Memoria en Tiempos de Globalización (Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
7. The number of Jews that lived in Spain during the first decades of the twentieth century until 1936 never reached more than 6000. The outbreak of the Civil War significantly reduced this figure. Avni, H. (1982) Spain, the Jews, and Franco (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America), pp. 40–50.Google Scholar
8.Avni, H. (1982) Spain, the Jews, and Franco (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America), pp. 204–205.Google Scholar
9.Mandell L. Berman Institute North American Jewish Data Bank (2007) World Jewish Population, 2007 (http://www.jewishdatabank.org), pp. 577 and 582.Google Scholar
10.Rother, B. (2005) Franco y el Holocausto (Madrid: Marcial Pons), pp. 125–126.Google Scholar
11.Rother, B. (2005) Franco y el Holocausto (Madrid: Marcial Pons), pp. 158–179 and 126.Google Scholar
12. The testimony of the Blue Division with regard to the Jewish extermination has barely been addressed by historians. I have only recently found a work by Wayne Bowen, which argues that the Blue Division treated the Jews of Suwatki and Grodno (Poland), Novgorod (Russia), and Riga and Vilnius respectfully and even defied Nazi racial policies. Bowen, W. (1998) ‘A great moral victory’: Spanish protection of Jews on the Eastern Front, 1941–1944. In: R. Rohrlich (Ed.) Resisting the Holocaust (Oxford and New York: Berg), pp. 195–213.Google Scholar
13.Rother, B. (2005) Franco y el Holocausto (Madrid: Marcial Pons), pp. 158–179 and 125.Google Scholar
14. There are several studies about the fate of around 15,000 Spaniards that were sent to Nazi concentration camps during the Second World War. The case of Mauthausen is highly relevant; thousands of Jews, mostly Dutch, were also deported to this camp between 1939 and 1945. Le Chêne, E. (1971) Mauthausen: The History of a Death Camp (Bath: Chivers Press), pp. 11–115. D. Wingeate Pike (2000) Spaniards in the Holocaust: Mauthausen, the Horror on the Danube (London: Routledge), p. 9.Google Scholar
15.Suárez Fernández, L. (1984) Francisco Franco y su tiempo (Madrid: Fundación Nacional Francisco Franco).Google Scholar
16.Salinas, D. (1996) España, los Sefarditas y el Tercer Reich (Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid).Google Scholar
17.de la Cierva, R., Franco, la historia (Madrid: Fénix, 2000).Google Scholar
18.Avni, H. (1982) Spain, the Jews, and Franco (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America).Google Scholar
19.Avni, H. (1982) Spain, the Jews, and Franco (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America), pp. 186–187.Google Scholar
20.Marquina, A. and Ospina, I. (1987) España y los judíos en el s. XX: la acción exterior (Madrid: Espasa Calpe).Google Scholar
21.Rother, B. (2005) Franco y el Holocausto (Madrid: Marcial Pons), pp. 408–409.Google Scholar
22.Payne, S.G. (2008) Franco and Hitler. Spain, Germany, and World War II (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 220.Google Scholar
23.Rohr, I. (2007) The Spanish Right and the Jews, 1898–1945: Anti-Semitism and Opportunism (Brighton: Sussex Academic Press), p. 5.Google Scholar
24. I believe that the word ‘perception’ is more suitable for Spain than ‘memory’, when referring to the place of the Jewish extermination in that country. According to The Oxford English Dictionary, the word ‘memory’ means ‘the faculty by which things are remembered; the capacity for retaining, perpetuating, or reviving the thought of things’ (Vol. IX, 597), and thus it suggests that the subject's act of remembering is tied to a personal experience. Similarly, ‘remembrance’ indicates ‘memory or recollection in relation to a particular object, fact, etc.’ (Vol. XIII, 586). The most precise term for the purpose of this investigation is ‘perception’, which means ‘the action of the mind by which it refers its sensations to an external object as their cause’ (Vol. XI, 523). J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. (Prep.) (1989) The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press). As the first part of this text suggests, Spain's links to the Jewish extermination are limited to certain groups and not to the whole country. For this reason, the most accurate word is ‘perception’, yet in particular cases the term ‘remembrance’ will also be used.Google Scholar
25. There are many definitions of the word ‘trauma’. Cathy Caruth indicates that ‘trauma’ generally describes ‘an overwhelming experience of sudden or catastrophic events, in which the response to the event occurs in the often delayed and uncontrolled repetitive occurrence of hallucinations and other intrusive phenomena’. Caruth, C. (1991) Unclaimed experience: trauma and the possibility of history. Yale French Studies, 79, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.LaCapra, D. (c1994) Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), p. 188.Google Scholar
27.LaCapra, D. (c1994) Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), p. 220.Google Scholar
28.LaCapra, D. (2002) History and Memory after Auschwitz, quoted in W. Kansteiner (2002) Finding meaning in memory: a methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Theory, 41(2), 187.Google Scholar
29.Kansteiner, W. (2002) Finding meaning in memory: a methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Theory, 41(2), 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Halbwachs, M. (1980) The Collective Memory (New York: Harper), p. 80.Google Scholar
31.Halbwachs, M. (1980) The Collective Memory (New York: Harper), p. 51.Google Scholar
32.Halbwachs, M. (1980) The Collective Memory (New York: Harper), p. 84.Google Scholar
33. Of special interest are Klas-Göran Karlsson's reflections on the memory of the Holocaust as an ever-changing ‘cultural phenomenon’ that evolves differently from the real event. Karlsson mentions Claus Bryld's understanding of ‘historical culture’ as ‘the individual and collective process in which history is communicated and used from fixed forms (genres) and norms’, and highlights the need to pay attention to ‘the historical transfer as an instrument of socialization’. Karlsson, K.-G. (2006) The Holocaust as a problem of historical culture. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), pp. 14 and 31.Google Scholar
34.Evans, R.J. (2003) Introduction: redesigning the past: history in political transitions. Journal of Contemporary History, 38(1), 7 and 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Lagrou, P. (2000) The Legacy of Nazi Occupation: Patriotic Memory and National Recovery in Western Europe, 1945–1965 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 22, 35, 251 and 260.Google Scholar
36.Rousso, H. (1991) The Vichy Syndrome (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press) pp. 16–59.Google Scholar
37.Österberg, O. (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), p. 25.Google Scholar
38.Österberg, O. (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
39.Österberg, O. (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), p. 29.Google Scholar
40.Österberg, O. (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), p. 42.Google Scholar
41.Zander, U. (2006) To rescue or be rescued: the liberation of Bergen-Belsen and the white buses in British and Swedish historical cultures. In: O. Österberg (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), p. 359.Google Scholar
42.Zander, U. (2006) To rescue or be rescued: the liberation of Bergen-Belsen and the white buses in British and Swedish historical cultures. In: O. Österberg (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), p. 364.Google Scholar
43.Zander, U. (2006) To rescue or be rescued: the liberation of Bergen-Belsen and the white buses in British and Swedish historical cultures. In: O. Österberg (2006) Taming ambiguities: the representation of the Holocaust in post-war Italy. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), pp. 364–367.Google Scholar
44.Todorov, T. (2000) Los Abusos de la Memoria (Barcelona: Paidós), p. 13.Google Scholar
45.Brown-Fleming, S. (2004) ‘The worst enemies of a better Germany’: post-war anti-Semitism among Catholic clergy and US occupation forces. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 18(3), 386–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Lagrou, P. (2000) The Legacy of Nazi Occupation: Patriotic Memory and National Recovery in Western Europe, 1945–1965 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 256–257.Google Scholar
47.Brown-Fleming, S. (2004) ‘The worst enemies of a better Germany’: post-war anti-Semitism among Catholic clergy and US occupation forces. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 18(3), 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Phayer, M. (1996) The German Catholic church after the Holocaust. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 10(2), 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Zygmut Bauman quoted in Wolak, A.J. (c2004) Forced Out: the Fate of Polish Jewry in Communist Poland (Tucson, AZ: Fenestra Books), p. 69.Google Scholar
50. Arthur J. Wolak has indicated that the Polish Communist leadership used anti-Semitism to deflect internal problems. Although, theoretically, anti-Semitism would have been banned from the Communist regime, in practice Jews were unprotected from official persecution, as the 1967–1968 anti-Semitic campaign showed. The Jews became the perfect scapegoat at a time when anti-Semitism and anti-Sovietism increased. Gomulka successfully implemented anti-Semitic campaigns due to the regime's control of the mass media, which allowed him to ensure a complete ‘manipulation of the masses’. Wolak, A.J. (c2004) Forced Out: the Fate of Polish Jewry in Communist Poland (Tucson, AZ: Fenestra Books), pp. 35–42 and 58–72.Google Scholar
51. As Slawomir Kapralski has argued that, in order to gain legitimacy, the post-war Communist leadership had to insert itself into Poland's ‘national tradition’ and tried ‘to present the Communist system as a continuation of elements integral to that tradition and at the same time acceptable in terms of the Communist vision of history’. According to Kapralski, the Jewish extermination was utterly irrelevant to the Communists, and references to the Jewish specificity were completely ignored when remembering the struggle against the Nazis. Kapralski, S. (2001) Battlefields of memory: landscape and identity in Polish-Jewish relations. History and Memory, 13(2), 45, 48 and 54.Google Scholar
52.Törnquist-Plewa, B. (2006) The tale of Szydlowiec’: memory and oblivion in a former Shetl in Poland. In: K.-G. Karlsson and U. Zander (Eds) The Holocaust on Post-War Battlefields: Genocide as Historical Culture (Malmö: Sekel Bokförlag), pp. 211–215.Google Scholar
53.Gitelman, Z. (1990) The evolution of Soviet anti-Zionism: from principle to pragmatism. In: R.S. Wistrich (Ed.) Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism in the Contemporary World (Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with the Institute of Jewish Affairs), p. 23.Google Scholar
54.Wistrich, R. (1990) Left-wing anti-Zionism in western societies. In: R.S. Wistrich (Ed.) Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism in the Contemporary World (Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with the Institute of Jewish Affairs), pp. 48 and 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Lipstadt, D.E. (c1993) Denying the Holocaust (New York: Free Press), pp. 50–64.Google Scholar
56.Wetzel, J. (1997) Anti-Semitism among right-wing extremist groups, organizations, and parties in post-unification Germany. In: H. Kurthen, W. Bergmann and R. Erb (Eds) Anti-Semitism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 162–163.Google Scholar
57.Lipstadt, D.E. (c1993) Denying the Holocaust (New York: Free Press), pp. 103–104.Google Scholar
58.Bailer-Galanda, B. (1997) ‘Revisionism’ in Germany and Austria. The evolution of a doctrine. In: H. Kurthen, W. Bergmann and R. Erb (Eds) Anti-Semitism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 189.Google Scholar
59.Bailer-Galanda, B. (1997) ‘Revisionism’ in Germany and Austria. The evolution of a doctrine. In: H. Kurthen, W. Bergmann and R. Erb (Eds) Anti-Semitism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 184–186.Google Scholar
60.Alvarez Chillida, G. (2002) El Antisemitismo en España. La Imagen del judío (1812–2002) (Madrid: Marcial Pons).Google Scholar
61.Rodríguez Jiménez, J.L. (1997) La extrema derecha española en el siglo XX (Madrid: Alianza Editorial).Google Scholar
62.Casals, X. (1995) Neonazis en España. De las audiciones wagnerianas a los skinheads (1965–1995) (Barcelona: Grijalbo).Google Scholar
63.Anti-Defamation League (2009) Attitudes Towards Jews in Seven European Countries (New York: www.adl.org).Google Scholar
64.Alexander, J.C. (2002) On the social construction of moral universals: the ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
65.Wieviorka, A. (1999) From survivor to witness: voices from the Shoah. In: J. Winter and E. Sivan (Eds) War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge), p. 137.Google Scholar
66.Alexander, J.C. (2002) On the social construction of moral universals: the ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 44–46.Google Scholar
67. For a study on analogies between the Holocaust and the Balkan Wars made by Americans see Steinweis, A.E. (2005) The Auschwitz analogy: Holocaust memory and American debates over intervention in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 19(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68.Linenthal, E.T. (1995) Preserving Memory: The Struggle to Create America's Holocaust Museum (London: Penguin), p. 249.Google Scholar
69.Huyssen, A. (2002) En Busca del Futuro Perdido: Cultura y Memoria en Tiempos de Globalización (Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica), pp. 17–18. (author's own translation).Google Scholar
70.Novick, P. (1999) The Holocaust in American Life (New York: Houghton Mifflin), p. 192.Google Scholar
71.Novick, P. (1999) The Holocaust in American Life (New York: Houghton Mifflin), pp. 188–194.Google Scholar
72.Rosenberg, D. (2006) L'Espagne contemporaine at la question juive. Les fils renoués de la memoire et de l'histoire (Toulousse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail), p. 287.Google Scholar
73.Lazo, A. (1995) La Iglesia, la Falange y el Fascismo (Sevilla: Secretariado de Publicaciones).Google Scholar
74.Ben-Dror, G. (2003) La Iglesia Católica ante el Holocausto: España y América Latina, 1933–1945 (Madrid: Alianza Editorial).Google Scholar