Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:31:59.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Good government and the historian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

R. C. van Caenegem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main constitutions with which medieval and modern Europe has experimented in the search for the best form of government are surveyed: most of them have now been relegated to the museum of legal antiques. However, constitutionalism and parliamentarianism proved to be permanent and are still highly valued acquisitions. The merits of a written constitution are discussed. This is followed by a presentation of the role of the nation state and its present embattled status. Can the past tell us what the best form of government is and, on the basis of the ‘Weber-thesis’, is there a link between political freedom and economic prosperity? The American controversy on capital punishment shows how the interpretation of the Constitution by the judicature can be a matter of life and death.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 1998 , pp. 415 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.van Caenegem, R. C. (1995) An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge) pp. 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H. W. (1984) A Constitutional History of Germany in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London and New York, 1984) pp. 164–240.Google Scholar
2.van Caenegem, R. C. (1993) Judges, legislators and professors. Chapters in European Legal History. 2nd Edn (Cambridge).Google Scholar
3.van Caenegem, R. C. (1991), Max Weber: Historian and Sociologist (London and Rio Grande: Hambledon Press) pp. 201–222.Google Scholar
4.Brennan, W. J. (1906) Harvard Law Review, 99, 313–331.Google Scholar
Irons, P. (1994) Brennan vs. Rehnquist. The Battle for the Constitution (New York).Google Scholar
Storme, M. (1996) International Encyclopedia of Laws (Antwerp) pp. 175–210.Google Scholar