Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:44:15.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The modernity of medieval law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Raoul van Caenegem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Medieval lawsuits from the highest courts of England and France show the concern of authorities for even minor issues involving ordinary people – a democratic and modern trait. In comparing the English Court of Common Pleas to the Parlement of Paris, it can be seen that classical Roman law made a great impact on France, while the English Court ignored Roman law and applied English customary law and acts of Parliament. The Parlement of Paris also had to apply local customs, but its judges had all studied Roman and no customary law at the university; however, for political reasons they were not allowed to refer openly to the Roman law in which they had been educated. The jury was a major medieval contribution to modern democratic thinking, as was the political idea that matters concerning the whole community ought to be decided by all its members. The American power-sharing system, between President and Congress, continues the late medieval balance between King and Parliament. English common law was one of the great creations of the Middle Ages and the only system of comparable importance is continental civil law (with Germanic and Roman roots). This paper considers the chances of the elaboration in the 21st century of a common European law combining elements from both traditions.

Type
Erasmus Lecture
Information
European Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 37 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Brand, P. A. (ed) (1996) The Earliest English Law Reports, I: Common Bench Reports to 1284, London, nr 1284.11, pp. 169–172 (Selden Society, vol. 111).Google Scholar
2.Brand, P. A. (ed) (1996) The Earliest English Law Reports, II: Common Bench Reports 1285–1289, London, nr. 1287.2, p. 270–271 (Selden Society, vol. 111). Thomas of Arden and Henry the Serjeant were summoned to answer Peter de la Bruere and John Baker, executors of the will of Nicholas de Hecche, on a plea as to why they had taken a cow belonging to the same Peter.Google Scholar
3.Van Caenegem, R. C. (ed) (1977) Les arrêts et jugés du Parlement de Paris sur appels flamands II, Brussels, nr. 536, pp. 542–545. Sentence was given on 23 June 1470 on an appeal from the Governor of Lille, whose judgment was confirmed.Google Scholar
4.Deorum, De natura, 3, 35, 86, where we find, inter alia, the phrase nec in regnis quidem reges omnia minima curant, i.e. like the gods, kings are not interested in all the trivialities in their kingdoms.Google Scholar
5. See on all this Spruit, J. E. (1998) De minimis non curat praetor. In: Jacobs, B. C. M. and Coppens, E. C. (eds), Een Rijk Gerecht. Opstellen aangeboden aan prof. mr. P. L. Nève, Nijmegen, pp. 421–430 (Rechtshistorische Reeks v. h. Gerard Noodt Instituut, nr. 41).Google Scholar
6.Plucknett, T. F. T. (1956) A Concise History of the Common Law (London), p. 279.Google Scholar
7.SirFortescue, John was appointed Chief Justice of the King's Bench in 1442. He became involved in politics, joining the Lancastrian party at the time of the Wars of the Roses, and went into exile in France with the Queen. He later rallied to Edward IV, from the House of York, and was pardoned. His principal work is De Laudibus Legum Angliae (In Praise of the Laws of England), written in 1470 or 1471, in which he favourably compared the English law to the French, which he had studied while in exile. He also wrote a work in English entitled The Governance of England.Google Scholar
8.Van Caenegem, R. C. (1965) L'histoire du droit et la chronologie Réflexions sur la formation du ‘Common Law’ et la procédure romano-canonique. In: Etudes d'histoire du droit canonique dédiées à Gabriel Le Bras, II, Paris, pp. 1459–1470; R. C. Van Caenegem (1988) The Birth of The English Common Law (Cambridge) pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
9.Wieacker, F. (1967) Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Entwicklung, Göttingen, pp. 45–96; H. Coing (ed) (1973) Handbuch der Quellen und Literatur der neueren europäischen Privatrechtsgeschichte, I: Mittelalter (1100–1500), (Munich); J. M. Kelly (1992) A Short History Of Western Legal Theory (Oxford), pp. 114–158; M. Bellomo (1995) The Common Legal Past of Europe 1000–1800, (Washington) (Studies In Medieval And Early Modern Canon Law, vol. 4).Google Scholar
10.Turner, R. V. (1968) The King and his Courts. The Role of John and Henry III in the Administration of Justice, 1199–1240. (Ithaca, New York); R. V. Turner (1985) The English Judiciary in the Age of Glanvill and Bracton, c. 1176–1239, (Cambridge); P. Brand (1992) The Making of the Common Law (London and Rio Grande) (coll. art.).Google Scholar
11. The texts destined for the public, i.e. the judgments delivered to the parties, contained no Roman law, but the plaidoiries, registered in the archives of the Parlement, included Roman-law allegations, as did the private notebooks of the lawyers involved.Google Scholar
12. Following the adage Stadtrecht bricht Landrecht, Landrecht bricht Gemeines Recht (urban law has precedence over regional law, and regional law over the common learned law).Google Scholar
13. I am following here some of the ideas expounded by Lupoi, Maurizio in his imposing overview Alle radici del mondo giuridico europeo. Saggio storico-comparativo, (Rome, 1994).Google Scholar
14. Quoted in Fuhrmann, H. (1996) Sind eben alles Menschen gewesen. Gelehrtenleben im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Munich) p. 21.Google Scholar
15.Padoa Schioppa, A. (ed) (1987) The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany 1700–1900 (Berlin).Google Scholar
16.Ullmann, W. (1967) The Individual and Society in the Middle Ages (London) p. 80; W. Ullmann (1975) Law and Politics in the Middle Ages. An Introduction to The Sources of Medieval Political Ideas (London). (The Sources of History: Studies in the Uses of Historical Evidence), p. 282.Google Scholar
17. The original note in Law French reads as follows: ‘Nul seygnur… ne pout vendre ne doner… si la comunalte de le vile ne sa sente, pur ceo que la chose touche la comunalte, saunz ky cele franchise ne pout estre done ne grante’ (Brand, P A. (ed) (1996) The Earliest English Law Reports, II: Common Bench Reports 1285–1289, London, nr. 1285.5, II, p. 206 (Selden Society vol. 112).Google Scholar
18. The city archives of Ghent, for example, conserve special registers of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries where hundreds of cases that led to reconciliation are recorded (in the fourteenth century on average 325 cases, as against 70 that came before the ordinary criminal court). These cases came before a specific branch of the city aldermen known as paisiers (peace-makers) and their court was known as the Zoenrechtbank (court of reconciliation). The activity of this court came practically to an end in the early sixteenth century, leaving the field to the peinliches Strafrecht of the ordinary criminal jurisdiction. In their prime the ‘peace-makers’ had dealt with up to 1000 cases a year (in 1430). The end eventually came in 1551–1552 with two cases.Google Scholar
19.Tierney, B. (1962) ‘The prince is not bound by the laws’. Accursius and the origins of the modern state. In: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Henry de Bracton, who died in 1268, was a royal judge who wrote the most comprehensive treatise on the early common law, entitled De legibus et consuetudinibus Angliae.Google Scholar
21. For details and arguments I refer readers to the aforementioned book ‘The Birth of the English Common Law’.Google Scholar
22.Zimmermann, R. (1993) Der europäische Charakter des englischen Rechts. In: Zeitschrift für Euorpäisches Privatrecht, pp. 4–51.Google Scholar
23. In 1992 an International Colloquium, held at Moncton, New Brunswick, was devoted to a historical–comparative study of legal ‘receptions’. The papers were published and constitute a goldmine of information on this remarkable phenomenon in Europe, Africa, Asia and America: Doucet, M. and Vanderlinden, J. (eds) (1994) La réception des systèmes juridiques. Implantation et destin (Brussels). The case of Japan is analysed by Professor Ishii, of the University of Tokyo, under the title The reception of the occidental systems by the Japanese legal system (pp. 239–266).Google Scholar
24. For a brief outline of this development see Van Caenegem, R. C. (1994) An Historical Introduction to Private Law (Cambridge) pp. 45–84.Google Scholar
25.Zimmermann, R. (1993) Der europäische Charakter des englischen Rechts. In: Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht.Google Scholar
26. The most eloquent voice of the ‘unbelievers’ can be found in Legrand, P. (1996) European legal systems are not converging. In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45, 52–81. The language problem is underlined in T. Weir (1995) Die Sprachen des europäischen Rechts. Eine skeptische Betrachtung. In: Zeitschrift fur Europäisches Privatrecht, pp. 368–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Gordley, J. (1993) Common law und civil law: eine überholte Unterscheidung. In: Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, 3, 199.Google Scholar
28. This modernization of the forms of process is, for the time being, taken to a logical conclusion by the introduction in England and Wales of a new code of civil procedure, in 05 1999.Google Scholar
29. See on all this: Gordley, J. (1993) Common law und civil law: eine überholte Unterscheidung. In: Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, 3, 498–518; A. W. B. Simpson (1975) Innovation in nineteenth century contract law. In: Law Quarterly Review, 91, 247–278; J. Gordley (1991) The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine (Oxford).Google Scholar
30.Van Caenegem, R. C. (1991) The Rechtsstaat in historical perspective. In: R. C. Van Caenegem, Legal History: a European Perspective (London and Rio Grande), pp. 185–200; H. Mohnhaupt (1993–94) Zur Geschichte des Rechtsstaats in Deutschland. Begriff und Funktion eines schwierigen Verfassungsprinzips. In: Acta Facultatis Politico-Iuridicae Universitatis Budapestensis, XXXIV, 39–60.Google Scholar
31. Nevertheless, such was the love of secrecy in the age that the law of 1655 was only read in public at the coronation of King Christian V, in 1671, and published in print in 1709. See Hattenhauer, H. (1994) Europäische Rechtsgeschichte (Heidelberg) pp. 403–404.Google Scholar
32. See on all this Van Caenegem, R. C. (1995) Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge) pp. 15–21, 158–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Neve, P. L. (1998) Toetsing als toetssteen (Tilburg).Google Scholar