Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:48:53.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overcoming History through Trauma. The Hungarian Historikerstreit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Éva Kovács
Éva Kovács*
Affiliation:
MTA TK SZI, H-1014 Budapest, Országház u. 50. E-mail: kovacs.eva@tk.mta.hu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the mid-summer of 2012, a sort of Historikerstreit broke out in Hungary. The main topics of the controversy were the language of and the attitude to the history of the Holocaust. In what follows I will argue that the Hungarian Historikerstreit is closely related to both the renaissance of the Horthy era (1920–1944) in current Hungarian politics and the ambivalent attitude towards the Holocaust in public memory. Since 2010, Hungary has celebrated ‘Trianon commemoration day’, remembering on the peace treaty of Trianon after the First World War. In today’s Hungary, Trianon seems to be a permanent trauma of the nation not only in the public memory but also in history writing. In spite of the fact that many respected scholars argue that currently the construction of the trauma of Trianon has a hegemonic position in Hungarian social memory and that the Holocaust cannot compete with it, I will show that the Trianon trauma is a construction of the current politics of history, which overshadows the tragic experiences of the First World War. Moreover, Trianon and the Holocaust are strongly interconnected historical events, which cannot be understood separately.

Type
Regimes of Memory II
Information
European Review , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 523 - 534
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.This is a revised version of a longer paper published in Korall in March 2015 entitled ‘Trianon, avagy ‘traumatikus fordulat’ a magyar történetírásban’ [Trianon – or a Traumatic Turn in Hungarian Historiography].Google Scholar
2.For example, Gábor Gyáni, Péter György, Ágnes Heller, Mária Ormos and Ignác Romsics.Google Scholar
3.See Laczó, F. (2011) The ‘Trianon’ – debate in the Hungarian left-liberal weekly Élet és Irodalom. Forum Geschichtskulturen, Hungary, Version: 1.0, 14.6.2011. (imre-kertesz-kolleg.uni-jena.de/index.php?id=414&l=0).Google Scholar
4.See Rigó, M. (2012) A Hungarian version of the Historikerstreit? A summary of the Romsics-Gerő debate among Hungarian historians (2012). Forum Geschichtskulturen, Hungary, Version: 1.0, 25.06.2013, (imre-kertesz-kolleg.uni-jena.de/index.php?id=415&l=0).Google Scholar
5. Kovács, É. (2010) Trianon traumatikus emlékezetéről [On the traumatic memory of Trianon]. Limes, 4, pp. 47–56; É. Kovács (2013) A nemzet einstandolása? Töprengések egy történészvita közben [The expropriation of the category of the nation? Reflections on the Hungarian Historikerstreit]. Café Babel, 72, 35–44.Google Scholar
6. Romsics, I. (2012) Magyar sorsfordulók 1920–1989 [Hungarian Peripeties 1920–1989] (Budapest: Osiris).Google Scholar
7. Bojtár, E. (2012) Antiszemita-e vagy? [Are you an anti-Semite?]. Élet és Irodalom, 30 (es.hu/bojtar_endre;antiszemita_vagy-e;2012-07-25.html).Google Scholar
8. Romsics, I. (2012) Antiszemita vagyok-e? [Am I an anti-Semite?]. Élet és Irodalom, 31 (es.hu/romsics_ignac;antiszemita_vagyok-e;2012-08-03.html).Google Scholar
9. Gyáni, G. (2012) Trianon versus holokauszt. Élet és Irodalom, 32 (es.hu/gyani_gabor;trianon_versus_holokauszt;2012-08-09.html).Google Scholar
10. György, P. (2012) Trianon és holokauszt – A múlt jövője. Élet és Irodalom, 34 (es.hu/gyorgy_peter;trianon_es_holokauszt_8211;_a_mult_jovoje;2012-08-23.html).Google Scholar
11. Romsics, I. (2012) Trianon és a holokauszt. Népszabadság (1 September) (nol.hu/belfold/20120901-huszadik_szazadi_traumaink-1329321).Google Scholar
12.See Radnóti, S. (2002) The glass cabinet. An essay about the place of the Hungarian crown. Acta Historiae Artium, 43(1), pp. 83–111; P. László (2003) The Holy Crown of Hungary, visible and invisible. Slavonic and East European Review, 81(3), pp. 421–510.Google Scholar
13.See Fritz, R. (2012) Nach Krieg und Judenmord. Ungarns Geschichtspolitik seit 1944 (Göttingen: Wallstein).Google Scholar
14. Kovács, É. and Seewann, G. (2006) Juden und Holocaust in der ungarischen Erinnerungskultur. Südosteuropa (54. Jhrg.), 1, pp. 24–59.Google Scholar
15.See Feischmidt, M. (ed.) (2014) Nemzet a mindennapokban. Az újnacionalizmus populáris kultúrája [Nation in the Everyday Life. The Popular Culture of Neonationalism] (Budapest: L’Harmattan – MTA TK).Google Scholar
16.See Kolozsi, Á. (2012) Social constructions of the native faith: Mytho-historical Narratives and Identity-discourse of Hungarian Neopaganism. PhD Dissertation CEU Budapest 2012. www.etd.ceu.hu/2012/kolozsi_adam.pdf.Google Scholar
17.See Balog, I. (2004) Politikai hisztériák Közép- és Kelet-Európában. Bibó István fasizmusról, nacionalizmusról, antiszemitizmusról [Political Hysterias in East-Central Europe. István Bibó on Fascism, Nationalism and Anti-Semitism] (Budapest: Argumentum); I. Z. Dénes (2012) Adopting the European model versus national egoism: the task of surpassing political hysteria. European Review, 4, pp. 514–525; B. Trencsényi (2009) History and character: visions of national peculiarity in the Romanian political discourse of the nineteenth-century. In: D. Mishkova (ed.), We, the People: Politics of National Peculiarity in Southeastern Europe (Budapest: CEU Press), pp. 139–178.Google Scholar
18.See, for example, Alexander, J. C. (2012) Trauma: A Social Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press); S. Friedländer Saul (ed.) (1992) Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the ‘Final Solution’ (Boston: Harvard University Press); D. LaCapra (2001) Writing History, Writing Trauma (Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press); R. Leys (2013) Trauma: A Genealogy (Chicago: Chicago University Press); M. Roth (2011) Memory, trauma, and history. Essays on living with the past (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
19. Erős, F. (2007) Trauma és történelem [Trauma and History] (Budapest: Jószöveg); J. L. Herman (1992) Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
20. Braun, R. (1994) The Holocaust and problems of historical representation. History and Theory, 2, pp. 172–197; R. Braun (1995) Holocaust, elbeszélés, történelem [Holocaust, Narration, History] (Budapest: Osiris–Gond).Google Scholar
21. Komoróczy, G. (2000) Holocaust. A pernye beleég a bőrünkbe [Holocaust. The Ashes Burnt Into Our Skin] (Budapest: Osiris).Google Scholar
22. Gyáni, G. (2007) Relatív történelem [Relative History] (Budapest: Typotex).Google Scholar
23. Virágh, Sz. (2011) Trauma és történelem találkozása. Emlékezet, reprezentáció, rítus. [Trauma Meets with History. Memory, Representation, Ritual]. BUKSZ, 2, pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
24.See Kansteiner, W. (2004) Genealogy of a category mistake: a critical intellectual history of the cultural trauma metaphor. Rethinking History, 2, pp. 193–221; H. Weilnböck (2007) ‘Das Trauma muss dem Gedächtnis unverfügbar bleiben.’ Trauma-Ontologie und anderer Miss-/Brauch von Traumakonzepten in geisteswissenschaftlichen Diskursen. Mittelweg, 2, pp. 2–64. In English: eurozine.com/articles/2008-03-19-weilnbock-en.html.Google Scholar
25.For example, Feischmidt, M. (2014) Populáris emlékezetpolitikák és az újnacionalizmus: a Trianon-kultusz társadalmi alapjai [Neonationalist popular memory cultures: the social roots of the Trianon cult]. In: M. Feischmidt (ed.), Nemzet a mindennapokban. Az újnacionalizmus populáris kultúrája [Nation in the Everyday Life. The Popular Culture of Neonacionalism] (Budapest: L’Harmattan – MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont), pp. 51–81.Google Scholar
26. Connerton, P. (1989) How Societies Remember (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
27.See, for example, Benko, J., Hanula, M., Hollý, K., Hudek, A., Michela, M., Rybářová, P., Sabol, M., Schvarc, M., Segeš, D., Šoltés, P., Vörös, L. and Zavacká, M. (2013) Overcoming the Old Borders Beyond the Paradigm of Slovak National History (Bratislava: Institute of History, Slovak Academy of Sciences in Prodama).Google Scholar
28. Ablonczy, B. (2010) Triano n-legen dák [Trianon Legends] (Budapest: Jaffa); D. Turbucz (2011) Horthy Miklós (Budapest, Napvilág); M. Zeidler (2007) Ideas on Territorial Revision in Hungary 1920–1945 (Atlantic Research and Publications: Boulder/Highland Lakes/New York).Google Scholar
29. Freud, S., Ferenczi, S., Abraham, K., Simmel, E. and Jones, E. (1919) Zur Psychoanalyse der Kriegsneurosen. (Diskussion gehalten auf dem V. Internationalen Psychoanalytischen Kongress in Budapest, 28. und 29. September 1918) (Leipzig/Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag).Google Scholar