Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:30:44.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF GRAFTING ON TEA 1. GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

G. TUWEI ,
F. K. K. KAPTICH ,
M. C. LANGAT ,
K. C. CHOMBOI  and
R. H. V. CORLEY
G. TUWEI
Affiliation:
Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd, Kericho, Kenya
F. K. K. KAPTICH
Affiliation:
Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd, Kericho, Kenya
M. C. LANGAT
Affiliation:
Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd, Kericho, Kenya
K. C. CHOMBOI
Affiliation:
Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd, Kericho, Kenya
R. H. V. CORLEY*
Affiliation:
Highlands, New Road, Great Barford, Bedford MK44 3LQ, UK
*
‡Corresponding author: Herewardc@aol.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Trials in Kenya have shown that yields of tea clones can be increased significantly by grafting onto suitable rootstocks, with the best combinations giving profitable yield increases compared to straight cuttings. However, stock × scion interactions were significant, and not all clones gave useful responses to grafting even onto the best rootstocks, so combinations must be tested individually before commercial planting is considered. The effect of grafting was to increase the number of shoots harvested, with little change in mean shoot weight. Grafting had little or no effect on quality of the tea produced. Attempts to find a method of identifying good rootstocks without testing them in grafting trials were inconclusive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 521 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barua, D. N. (1989). Science and Practice in Tea Culture, Calcutta: Tea Research Association.Google Scholar
Bezbaruah, H. P. and Sahariah, U. K. (1982). Stock-scion influences on flowering and fruit-set in tea. Two & a bud 29:56–59.Google Scholar
Bore, J. K. A., Njuguna, C. K. and Owuor, P. O. (1995). Chip-budding in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) and its effects on yields and quality. Tea 16:9–13.Google Scholar
Bore, J. K. A. (1997). Composite tea plants:- is there a future potential? Tea 18:116–122.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. and Nyirenda, H. E. (1995). A successful plant improvement programme on tea (Camellia sinensis). Experimental Agriculture 31:307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, F. J. (1988). Rootstock selection programme. Quarterly Newsletter, Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa 91:10–11.Google Scholar
Kandiah, S., Kamal, B. and Wimaladharma, S. (1979). Investigations on some aspects of the interrelationship between yield and quality in tea. Tea Quarterly 8:41–47.Google Scholar
Kayange, C. W. (1990). Cleft grafting on unrooted tea cuttings in the nursery. Quarterly Newsletter, Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa 98:9–11.Google Scholar
Kayange, C. W., Scarborough, I. P. and Nyirenda, H. E. (1981). Rootstock influence on yield and quality of tea (Camellia sinensis L.). Journal of Horticultural Science 56:117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyirenda, H. E. (1990). Root growth characteristics and rootstock vigour in tea (Camellia sinensis). Journal of Horticultural Science 65:461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyirenda, H. E. and Kayange, C. W. (1984). Effect of rootstocks on components of yield in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O.Kuntze) 2. Stem circumference and number of branches. Journal of Horticultural Science 59:589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallemulla, D., Shanmugarajah, V. and Kathiravetpillai, A. (1992). Effect of grafting fresh cuttings on yield and drought resistance in tea. Sri Lanka Journal of Tea Science 61:45–50.Google Scholar
Pool, P. A. and Nyirenda, H. E. (1981). Effects of rootstocks on the components of yield in tea (Camellia sinensis L.). Journal of Horticultural Science 56:121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. A. H. and Smith, R. F. (1963). The phenolic substances of manufactured tea. IX. The spectrophotometric evaluation of tea liquors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 14:689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satyanarayana, N. (1980). Nursery grafting. Planters' Chronicle 75:488–489Google Scholar
Satyanarayana, N., Cox, S. and Sharma, V. S. (1991). Field performance of grafts made of fresh tea clonal cuttings. Planters' Chronicle 86:85–93.Google Scholar
Squire, G. R., Obaga, S. M. O. and Othieno, C. O. (1993). Altitude, temperature and shoot production of tea in the Kenyan Highlands. Experimental Agriculture 29:107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanton, T. W. (1979). Some factors limiting yields of tea (Camellia sinensis). Experimental Agriculture 15:187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templer, J. C. (1971). Grafting - top working field tea. Tea Research Institute of East Africa, Annual Report p. 47.Google Scholar
Tuwei, G. K., Kaptich, F. K. K., Langat, M. C., Smith, B. G. and Corley, R. H. V. (2008). Effects of grafting on tea 2 – Drought tolerance. Experimental Agriculture 44:537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, K. C. (1992). Field operations: 1. In Tea: Cultivation to consumption, 201–226 (Eds Willson, K. C. and Clifford, M. N.). London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulster, G. J. (1985). A non-destructive method for measuring root-system surface-area. HortScience 20:1058–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar