Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T11:53:02.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrient Uptake by Intercropped Maize and Cowpeas and a Concept of Nutrient Supplementation Index (NSI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

T. A. T. Wahua
T. A. T. Wahua
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Accumulation curves for N, P, K and Ca were determined for intercropped maize and cowpeas given different fertilizer combinations. Both species competed for these four elements, with cowpeas suffering relatively more than maize. A concept of a Nutrient Supplementation Index (NSI) was developed to aid studies on fertilization of crop mixtures. Using this index, it was estimated that an additional 9.7, 24.0, 9.7 and 30.6% of N, P, K and Ca, respectively (based on the requirement of sole-crop maize), might be needed to satisfy the combined needs of a 1:1 row maize–cowpea intercrop.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 263 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, S. & Gunasena, H. P. U. (1979). N-utilization and economics of some intercropping systems in tropical countries. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 56:117–123.Google Scholar
Baylor, J. E. (1974). Satisfying the nutritional requirements of grain–legume mixtures. In Forage Fertilization, 171–188 (Ed. Mays, D. A.). Madison: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Blaser, R. E. & Brady, N. C. (1950). Nutrient competition in plant associations. Agronomy Journal 42:128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, R. H. (1954). A nutrient mobility concept of soil-plant relationships. Soil Science 78:9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd Edn, 305–308. London: John WUey & Sons.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy 15:1–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, L. C. (1975). Intercropping soybeans with cereals. In Soybean Production, Protection and Utilization, 77–85 (Ed. Whigham, D. K.). Illinois: INTSOY.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. J. (1960). Growth and Nutrient Uptake by Corn. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service, Pamphlet No. 277.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. J. & Thompson, H. E. (1971). How a soybean plant develops. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service, Special Report No. 53.Google Scholar
Kalra, G. S. & Gangwar, B. (1980). Economics of intercropping legumes with maize at different levels of N under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 22:181–185.Google Scholar
Oelsligle, D. D., McCollum, R. E. & Kang, B. T. (1976). Soil fertility management in tropical multiple cropping. In Multiple Cropping, 275–292. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Special Publica- tion No. 27.Google Scholar
Okigbo, B. N. & Greenland, D. J. (1976). Intercropping systems in tropical Africa. In Multiple Cropping, 83–101. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Special Publication No. 27.Google Scholar
Remison, S. U. (1978). Neighbour effects between maize and cowpea at various levels of N and P. Experimental Agriculture 14:205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahua, T. A. T. & Miller, D. A. (1978a). Effects of intercropping on soybean N2-fixation and plant composition of associated sorghum and soybeans. Agronomy Journal 70:292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahua, T. A. T. & Miller, D. A. (1978b). Relative yield totals and yield components of intercropped sorghum and soybeans. Agronomy Journal 70:287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar