Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:48:35.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CRITICAL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON RANGE FOR OPTIMAL CROP RESPONSE TO MINERAL FERTILISER NITROGEN ON A FERRALSOL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2016

PATRICK MUSINGUZI*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
PETER EBANYAT
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda IITA-Uganda, Plot 15 Naguru East Road, P.O Box 7878, Kampala, Uganda
JOHN STEPHEN TENYWA
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
TWAHA ALI BASAMBA
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
MOSES MAKOOMA TENYWA
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
DRAKE N. MUBIRU
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, P.O Box 7064, Kampala, Uganda
*
Corresponding author. Email: musipato@yahoo.com

Summary

Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) is a major indicator of soil fertility in the tropics and underlies variability in crop response to mineral fertilizers. Critical SOC concentrations that interact positively with N fertilizer for optimal crop yield are less understood. A study was conducted on a Ferralsol in sub-humid Uganda to explore the critical range of SOC concentrations and associated fractions for optimal maize (Zea mays L.) yield response to applied mineral N fertiliser. Maize grain yield response to N rates applied at 0, 25, 50 and 100 kg N ha−1 in 30 fields of low fertility (SOC < 1.2%), medium fertility (SOC = 1.2–1.7%) and high fertility (SOC > 1.7%) was assessed. Soil was physically fractionated into sand-sized (63–2000 µm), silt-sized (2–63 µm) and clay-sized (<2 µm) particles and SOC content determined. Low fertility fields (<1.2% SOC) resulted in the lowest response to N application. Fields with >1.2% SOC registered the highest agronomic efficiency (AE) and grain yield. Non-linear regression models predicted critical SOC for optimal yields to be 2.204% at the 50 kg N ha−1 rate. Overall, models predicted 1.9–2.2% SOC as the critical concentration range for high yields. The critical range of SOC concentrations corresponded to 3.5–5.0 g kg−1 sand-sized C and 9–11 g kg−1 for clay-sized C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alivelu, K., Srivastava, S., Subba Rao, A., Singh, K., Selvakumari, G. and Raju, N. (2003). Comparison of modified mitscherlich and response plateau models for calibrating soil test based nitrogen recommendations for rice on typic Ustropept. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 34:26332643.Google Scholar
Bayer, C., Martin-Neto, L., Mielniczuk, J., Pillon, C. and Sangoi, L. (2001). Changes in soil organic matter fractions under subtropical no-till cropping systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:14731478.Google Scholar
Bekunda, M., Sanginga, N., & Woomer, P. L. (2010). Restoring soil fertility in sub-sahara Africa. Advances in Agronomy 108:183236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, G., Walsh, J. R., Richards, J. E., Milburn, P. H. and Ziadi, N. (2000). Comparison of three statistical models describing potato yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 92:902908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouyoucos, G. J. (1936). Directions for making mechanical analyses of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science 42:225230.Google Scholar
Carter, M., Angers, D., Gregorich, E. and Bolinder, M. (2003). Characterizing organic matter retention for surface soils in eastern Canada using density and particle size fractions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83:1123.Google Scholar
Carter, M. R., and Gregorich, E. G. (Eds.). 2007. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 607635. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Carter, M. R. and Stewart, B. A. (Eds). (1995). Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils (Advances in Soil Science), 1st edn., 15–41.Google Scholar
Cerrato, M. and Blackmer, A. (1990). Comparison of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 82:138143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B. T. (1992). Physical fractionation of soil and organic matter in primary particle size and density separates. Advances in Soil Science 20:190.Google Scholar
Christensen, B. T. (2001). Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. European Journal of Soil Science 52:345353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, J. D. (1994). Estimating Fertilizer Requirements: A Quantitative Approach, UK: CAB International Wallingford, 272.Google Scholar
Ebanyat, P. (2009). A road to food? Efficacy of nutrient management options targeted to heterogeneous soilscapes in the Teso farming system, Uganda. PhD Thesis, Wagenigen, the Netherlands, 218.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. T. (1986). Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Science Society America Journal 50:518524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, C. and Beare, M. (1997). Physical control of soil organic matter dynamics in the tropics. Geoderma 79:69116.Google Scholar
Gregorich, E., Beare, M., McKim, U. and Skjemstad, J. (2006). Chemical and biological characteristics of physically uncomplexed organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:975985.Google Scholar
Hue, N., Craddock, G. and Adams, F. (1986). Effect of organic acids on aluminum toxicity in subsoils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50:2834.Google Scholar
IUSS Working Group, W. (2006). World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Report, 103.Google Scholar
Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H. J., Krupnik, T., Six, J. and van Kessel, C. (2005). Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Advances in Agronomy 87:85156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, P. and Webb, J. (2003). Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil and Tillage Research 70:118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallarino, A. and Blackmer, A. (1992). Comparison of methods for determining critical concentrations of soil test phosphorus for corn. Agronomy Journal 84:850856.Google Scholar
Monbiela, F., Nicholaides, J. and Nelson, L. (1981). A method to determine the appropriate mathematical form for incorporating soil test levels in fertilizer response models for recommendation purposes. Agronomy Journal 73:937941.Google Scholar
Mtambanengwe, F. and Mapfumo, P. (2005). Organic matter management as an underlying cause for soil fertility gradients on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 73:227243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mtambanengwe, F. and Mapfumo, P. (2008). Smallholder farmer management impacts on particulate and labile carbon fractions of granitic sandy soils in Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81:115.Google Scholar
Murage, E. W., Karanja, N. K., Smithson, P. C. and Woomer, P. L. (2000). Diagnostic indicators of soil quality in productive and non-productive smallholders’ fields of Kenya's central highlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 79:18.Google Scholar
Musinguzi, P., Ebanyat, P., Tenywa, J. S., Mwanjalolo, M., Basamba, T. A., Tenywa, M. M. and Porter, C. (2014). Using DSSAT-CENTURY model to simulate soil organic carbon dynamics under a low-input maize cropping system. Journal of Agricultural Science 6:120131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musinguzi, P., Tenywa, J. S., Ebanyat, P., Tenywa, M. M., Mubiru, N. D., Basamba, T.A. and Leip, A. (2013). Soil organic carbon thresholds and nitrogen management in tropical agroecosystems: concepts and prospects. Sustainable Development 6:3143.Google Scholar
Neeteson, J. and Wadman, W. (1987). Assessment of economically optimum application rates of fertilizer N on the basis of response curves. Fertilizer Research 12:3752.Google Scholar
Okalebo, J., Gathua, K. and Woomer, P. (2002). Laboratory methods of plant and soil analysis: a working manual. Nairobi: TSBF-UNESCO 128.Google Scholar
Olk, D. C. and Gregorich, E. G. (2006). Overview of the symposium proceedings, “Meaningful pools in determining soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics”. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:967974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palm, C. A., Gachengo, C. N., Delve, R. J., Cadisch, G. and Giller, K. E. (2001). Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 83:2742.Google Scholar
Payton, F., Rhue, R. and Hensel, D. (1989). Mitscherlich-Bray equation used to correlate soil phosphorus and potato yields. Agronomy Journal 81:571576.Google Scholar
Renck, A. and Lehmann, J. (2004). Rapid water flow and transport of inorganic and organic nitrogen in a highly aggregated tropical soil. Soil Science 169:330341.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A., Shepherd, K. D., Soule, M. J., Place, F. M., Buresh, R. J. and Izac, A. M. N. (1997). Soil fertility replenishment in Africa: an investment in natural resource capital. In Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa, 146 (Eds Buresh, R. J., Sanchez, P. A. and Calhoun, F.) Madison Wincosin, USA: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication.Google Scholar
Sherrod, L., Peterson, G., Westfall, D. and Ahuja, L. (2005). Soil organic carbon pools after 12 years in no-till dryland agroecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:16001608.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S., Subba Rao, A., Alivelu, K., Singh, K., Raju, N. and Rathore, A. (2006). Evaluation of crop responses to applied fertilizer phosphorus and derivation of optimum recommendations using the Mitscherlich–Bray equation. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37: 847858.Google Scholar
Steiner, C., Glaser, B., Geraldes Teixeira, W., Lehmann, J., Blum, W. E. and Zech, W. (2008). Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 171:893899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., Nehls, T., de Macêdo, J. L. V., Blum, W. E. and Zech, W. (2007). Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered central Amazonian upland soil. Plant and Soil 291:275290.Google Scholar
Swift, M., and Woomer, P. (1993). Organic matter and the sustainability of agricultural systems: definition and measurement. Ibadan (Nigeria): International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).Google Scholar
Tan, K. and Dowling, P. (1984). Effect of organic matter on CEC due to permanent and variable charges in selected temperate region soils. Geoderma 32:89101.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A. and Carter, A. (1989). Current and future uses of the UK soil water retention dataset. Indirect methods of estimating the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils, Proceedings of an International Workshop, Riverside, CA, 11–13.Google Scholar
Tiessen, H., Cuevas, E. and Chacon, P. (1994). The role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nature 371:783785.Google Scholar
Tisdall, J. and Oades, J. M. (1982). Organic matter and water‐stable aggregates in soils. Journal of Soil Science 33:141163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittonell, P. (2007). Msimu wa Kupanda-Targeting Resources within Diverse, Heterogeneous and Dynamic Farming Systems of East Africa. PhD Thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tittonell, P. and Giller, K. E. (2013). When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research 143:7690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittonell, P., Zingore, S., Van Wijk, M., Corbeels, M. and Giller, K. (2007). Nutrient use efficiencies and crop responses to N, P and manure applications in Zimbabwean soils: Exploring management strategies across soil fertility gradients. Field Crops Research 100:348368.Google Scholar
Ussiri, D., Mnkeni, P., MacKenzie, A. and Seraoka, J. (1998). Soil test calibration studies for formulation of phosphorus fertilizer recommendations for maize in Morogoro district, Tanzania. II. Estimation of optimum fertilizer rates. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 29:28152828.Google Scholar
van Breemen, N. and Buurman, P. (1998). Ferralitization. In Soil Formation, 291312. Wagenigen, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K. (2006). Popular myths around soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 116:3446.Google Scholar
Vanlauwe, B., Kihara, J., Chivenge, P., Pypers, P., Coe, R. and Six, J. (2011). Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management. Plant and Soil 339:3550.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, R. R., Islam, K. R., Stine, M. A., Gruver, J. B. and Samson-Liebig, S. E. (2003). Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:317.Google Scholar
Wortmann, C. S. and Eledu, C. A. (1999). Uganda's agro ecological zones: a guide for planners and policy makers. Kampala, Uganda: CIAT.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Ding, W., He, X., Yu, H., Fan, J. and Liu, D. (2014). Influence of 20–year organic and inorganic fertilization on organic carbon accumulation and microbial community structure of aggregates in an intensively cultivated sandy loam soil. PLoS One 9 (3):e92733.Google Scholar
Zingore, S., Murwira, H., Delve, R. and Giller, K. (2007). Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119:112126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar