Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:15:40.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of biochar and poultry manure on soil properties, growth, quality, and yield of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium Schott) in degraded tropical sandy soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2020

Taiwo Michael Agbede*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, P.M.B. 001, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria
Aruna Olasekan Adekiya
Affiliation:
College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, P.M.B. 1001, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
Adeniyi Shadrack Odoja
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
Lucia Nike Bayode
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
Paul O. Omotehinse
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
Imole Adepehin
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1019, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: agbedetaiwomichael@yahoo.com

Abstract

Use of biochar (B) and poultry manure (PM) as soil amendments can improve the productivity and sustainability of tropical agriculture. Our fieldwork is the first research on the agronomic use of B and PM for the growth of cocoyam in sandy soil of the humid tropics. In this study, the effects of B, PM and their mixture were investigated on soil properties, mineral and nutrient concentrations, growth, and corm and cormel yields of cocoyam during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. The experiment consisted of 4 × 2 factorial combinations of B (0, 10, 20, and 30 Mg ha−1) and PM (0 and 7.5 Mg ha−1). In both years, the application of B and PM either alone or in combination improved soil physical and chemical properties, plant nutritional status, growth, and corm and cormel yields of cocoyam. The combination of 30 Mg ha−1 B and 7.5 Mg ha−1 PM (B30 + PM7.5) gave the highest corm and cormel yields of cocoyam. Pooled over the 2 years, application of B at 30 Mg ha−1 and PM at 7.5 Mg ha−1 (B30 + PM7.5) significantly increased corm yield of cocoyam by 47 and 66%, respectively, when compared with sole PM at 7.5 Mg ha−1 and B at 30 Mg ha−1. Lowest corm and cormel yields were obtained for the unmanure control. The combination of 30 Mg ha−1 B and 7.5 Mg ha−1 PM is recommended for soil fertility management and cocoyam production in the rainforest agroecology of SW Nigeria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd El-Kader, A.A., Shaaban, S.M. and Abd El-Fattah, M.S. (2010). Effect of irrigation levels and organic compost on okra plants (Abelmoschus esculentus) grown in sandy calcareous soil. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 1(3), 225231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adekiya, A.O., Ojeniyi, S.O. and Agbede, T.M. (2011). Soil physical and chemical properties and cocoyam yield under different tillage systems in tropical Alfisol. Experimental Agriculture 47(3), 477488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adekiya, A.O., Agbede, T.M. and Ojeniyi, S.O. (2016). The effect of three years of tillage and poultry manure application on soil and plant nutrient composition, growth and yield of cocoyam. Experimental Agriculture 52(3), 466476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adekiya, A.O. (2018). Legume mulch materials and poultry manure affect soil properties, and growth and fruit yield of tomato. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 83(2), 161167.Google Scholar
Agbede, T.M. (2008). Nutrient availability and cocoyam yield under different tillage practices. Soil and Tillage Research 99(1), 4957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agbede, T.M. (2010). Tillage and fertilizer effects on some soil properties, leaf nutrient concentrations, growth and sweet potato yield on an Alfisol in southwestern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research 110(1), 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agbede, T.M. and Ojeniyi, S.O. (2009). Tillage and poultry manure effects on soil fertility and sorghum yield in southwestern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research 104(1), 7481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agbede, T.M., Adekiya, A.O. and Eifediyi, E.K. (2017). Impact of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on soil physical properties and growth and yield of carrot. Journal of Horticultural Research 25(1), 8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agbede, T.M., Adekiya, A.O.Ale, M.O., Eifediyi, E.K. and Olatunji, C.A. (2019). Effects of green manures and NPK fertilizer on soil properties, tomato yield and quality in the forest-savanna ecology of Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 55(5), 793806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agegnehu, G., Nelson, P.N. and Bird, M.I. (2016). The effects of biochar, compost and their mixture and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley grown on a Nitisol in the highlands of Ethiopia. Science of the Total Environment 569–570, 869879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akinrinde, E.A. and Obigbesan, G.O. (2000). Evaluation of the fertility status of selected soils for crop production in five ecological zones of Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of Soil Science Society of Nigeria, 279–288 (Ed. O. Babalola), 30 October-3 November, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Alburquerque, J.A., Salazar, P., Barrón, V., Torrent, J., del Campillo, M.C., Gallardo, A. and Villar, R. (2013). Enhanced wheat yield by biochar addition under different mineral fertilization levels. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33(3), 475484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alburquerque, J.A., Calero, J.M., Barrón, V., Torrent, J., del Campillo, M.C., Gallardo, A. and Villar, R. (2014). Effects of biochars produced from different feedstocks on soil properties and sunflower growth. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 177(1), 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anikwe, M.A.N., Emmanuel, O.P., Eze, J.C., Ibudialo, A.N. and Edeh, V.N. (2015). Identifying fertilizer management strategies to maximize soil nutrient acquisition by cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) in a degraded Ultisol in Agbani, Enugu Area, southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization Technology 5(2), 6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC. (2012). Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. In Latimer G.W. (ed), AOAC International, 19th edn. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International, pp. 2–15.Google Scholar
Asai, H., Samson, B.K., Stephan, H.M., Songyikhangsuthor, K., Homma, K., Kiyono, Y. and Horie, T. (2009). Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research 111(12), 8184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basso, A.S., Miguez, F.E., Laird, D.A., Horton, R. and Westgate, M. (2013). Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils. Global Change Biology and Bioenergy 5(2), 132143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berek, A.K. (2014). Exploring the potential roles of biochars on land degradation mitigation. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 1(3), 149158.Google Scholar
Blanco-Canqui, H. (2017). Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 81, 687711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockhoff, S.R., Christians, N.E., Killorn, R.J., Horton, R. and Davis, D.D. (2010). Physical and mineral-nutrition properties of sand-based turfgrass root zones amended with biochar. Agronomy Journal 102(6), 16271631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M.R. and Gregorich, E.G. (2007). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn. 1264. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaganti, V.N. and Crohn, D.M. (2015). Evaluating the relative contribution of physiochemical and biological factors in ameliorating a saline-sodic soil amended with composts and biochar and leached with reclaimed water. Geoderma 259–260, 4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K.Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A. and Joseph, S. (2007). Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(8), 629634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K.Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A. and Joseph, S. (2008). Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46(5), 437444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ridder, N. and van Keulen, H. (1990). Some aspects of the role of organic matter in sustainable intensified arable farming systems in West-African semi-arid-tropics (SAT). Fertilizer Research 26(1–3), 299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikinya, O. and Mufwanzala, N. (2010). Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 1(3), 4654.Google Scholar
Dou, L., Komatsuzaki, M. and Nakagawa, M. (2012). Effects of Biochar, Mokusakueki and Bokashi application on soil nutrients, yields and qualities of sweet potato. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science 2(8), 318327.Google Scholar
Downie, A., Crosky, A. and Munroe, P. (2009). Physical properties of biochar. In Lehmann J. and Joseph S. (eds), Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London, UK: Earthscan, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Gamage, D.N.V., Mapa, R.B., Dharmakeerthi, R.S. and Biswas, A. (2016). Effect of rice husk biochar on selected soil properties in tropical Alfisols. Soil Research 54(3), 302310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENSTAT. (2005). Genstat, 8th edn. Release 8.1. Oxford, UK: VSN International Ltd.Google Scholar
Githinji, L. (2014). Effect of biochar application rate on soil physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60(4), 457470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Głąb, T., Palmowska, J., Zaleski, T. and Gondek, K. (2016). Effect of biochar application on soil hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy soil. Geoderma 281, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J. and Zech, W. (2002). Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal – a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35(4), 219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwenzi, W., Chaukura, N., Mukome, F.N., Machado, S. and Nyamasoka, B. (2015). Biochar production and applications in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks and uncertainties. Journal of Environmental Management 150, 250261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, A., Gonzalez, J.M., Lima, I.M., Godwin, H.W., Halvorson, J.J. and Boyer, D.G. (2012). Chicken manure biochar as liming and nutrient source for acid Appalachian soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 41(4), 10961106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herath, H.M.S.K., Camps-Arbestain, M. and Hedley, M. (2013). Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma 209–210, 188197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, M.K., Strezov, V., Chan, K.Y. and Nelson, P.F. (2010). Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere 78(9), 11671171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F.G.A., van der Velde, M. and Bastos, A.C. (2011). A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 144(1), 175187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeerathumma, S., Mohankumar, B. and Nair, P.G. (1987). Nutrient Uptake and their Utilization by Yams, Aroids and Coleus. Technical Bulletin Series No.10, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.Google Scholar
Kingery, W.L., Wood, C.W., Mullins, G.L. and Williams, J.C. (1994). Impact of long-term application of broiler litter on environmentally related soil properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 23(1), 139147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. (1986). Soil surface management in the tropics for intensive land use and high and sustainable production. Advances in Soil Science 5, 1104.Google Scholar
Lampurlanes, J. and Cantero-Martinez, C. (2003). Soil bulk density and penetration resistance under different tillage and crop management systems and their relationship with barley root growth. Agronomy Journal 95(3), 526536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J. and Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. In Uphoff N., Ball A.S., Fernandes E., Herren H., Husson O., Laing M., Palm C., Pretty J., Sanchez P., Sanginga N. and Thies J. (eds), Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 517–530.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. Jr.da Silva, J.P., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W. and Glaser, B. (2003). Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil 249(2), 343357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J. and Rondon, M. (2006). Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(2), 403427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M.C., Thies, J., Masiello, C.A., Hockaday, W.C. and Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43(9), 18121836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, T.J., Spokas, K.A., Feyereisen, G. and Novak, J.M. (2016). Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties. Chemosphere 142, 136144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Major, J., Steiner, C., Downie, A. and Lehmann, J. (2009). Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. In Lehmann, J. and , S. (eds), Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London, UK: Earthscan, 271288.Google Scholar
Masto, R.E., Ansari, M.A., George, J., Selvi, V.A. and Ram, L.C. (2013). Co-application of biochar and lignite fly ash on soil nutrients and biological parameters at different crop growth stages of Zea mays. Ecological Engineering 58, 314322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masulili, A., Utomo, W.H. and Syechfani, M.S. (2010). Rice husk biochar for rice based cropping system in acid soil 1. The characteristics of rice husk biochar and its influence on the properties of acid sulfate soils and rice growth in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Science 2(1), 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekuria, W. and Noble, A. (2013). The role of biochar in ameliorating disturbed soils and sequestering soil carbon in tropical agricultural production systems. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2013 (Article ID 354965), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, M.A., Khalid, M., Aon, M., Abbas, G., Amjad, M., Murtaza, B., Khan, W.U.D. and Ahmad, N. (2017). Combined application of biochar with compost and fertilizer improves soil properties and grain yield of maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition 41(1), 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obi, M.E. and Nnabude, P.C. (1995). The effect of different management practices on the physical properties of a sandy loam soil in southern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research 12(1), 8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, M., Okimori, Y. and Takahashi, F. (2006). Carbon sequestration by carbonization of biomass and forestation: three case studies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(2), 421436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwueme, I.C. (1999). Taro Cultivation in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO and RAP Publication.Google Scholar
Partey, S.T., Preziosi, R.F. and Robson, G.D. (2014). Short-term interactive effects of biochar, green manure, and inorganic fertilizer on soil properties and agronomic characteristics of maize. Agricultural Research 3(2), 128136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, X., Ye, L.L., Wang, C.H., Zhou, H. and Sun, B. (2011). Temperature- and duration dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil and Tillage Research 112(2), 159166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revell, K.T., Maguire, R.O. and Agblevor, F.A. (2012). Field trials with poultry litter biochar and its effect on forages, green peppers, and soil properties. Soil Science 177, 573579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ramirez, J. and Hurtado, M. (2007). Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with biochar additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43(6), 699708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, H. and Glaser, B. (2012). Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiment. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 175(3), 410422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th edn. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E. and Bol, R. (2009). Biochar, Climate Change and Soil: A Review to Guide Future Research. Glen Osmond, Australia: CSIRO Land and Water Science Report.Google Scholar
Steinbeiss, S., Gleixner, G. and Antonietti, M. (2009). Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41(6), 13011310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, A.H., McCaskey, T.A. and Ruffin, B.G. (1990). A survey of broiler litter composition and potential value as a nutrient resource. Biological Wastes 34(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukartono, U.W., Kusuma, Z. and Nugroho, W.H. (2011). Soil fertility status, nutrient uptake, and maize (Zea mays L.) yield following biochar and cattle manure application on sandy soils of Lombok, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 49(1–2), 4752.Google Scholar
Tagoe, S.O., Takatsugu, H.T. and Matsui, T. (2008). Effects of carbonized and dried chicken manures on the growth, yield, and N content of soybean. Plant and Soil 306(1–2), 211220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiwo, L.B. and Oso, B.A. (2004). Influence of composting techniques on microbial succession, temperature and pH in a composting municipal solid waste. African Journal of Biotechnology 3(4), 239243.Google Scholar
Tejada, M. and Gonzalez, J.L. (2007). Influence of organic amendments on soil structure and soil loss under simulated rain. Soil and Tillage Research 93(1), 197205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tel, D.A. and Hagarty, M. (1984). Soil and Plant Analysis, 277. Nigeria, Guelph, Ontario, Canada: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), University of Guelph, Ibadan.Google Scholar
Uwah, D.F., Udoh, A.U. and Iwo, G.A. (2011). Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(1), 3338.Google Scholar
Uzoma, K.C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Fujimaki, H., Zahoor, A. and Nishihara, E. (2011a). Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use and Management 27(2), 205212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzoma, K.C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Zahoor, A. and Nishihara, E. (2011b). Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 9(3), 11371143.Google Scholar
Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Morris, S., Chan, K.Y., Downie, A., Rust, J., Joseph, S. and Cowie, A. (2010). Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil 327(1–2), 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamato, M., Okimori, Y., Wibowo, I.F., Anshiori, S. and Ogawa, M. (2006). Effects of application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 52(4), 489495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Chen, Q. and You, C.F. (2016). Biochar effect on water evaporation and hydraulic conductivity in sandy soil. Pedosphere 26, 265272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Agbede et al. Supplementary Materials

Agbede et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Agbede et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 36.5 KB