Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:34:59.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Sowing Pattern and Seed Rate on Green-chop Yield of Forage Sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

F. F. Bebawi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Sudan
A. E. Mazloum
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Shambat, Sudan

Summary

The effects of sowing pattern and seed rate on the green-chop yield of forage sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (cv. Pioneer 988) and forage sorghum (cv. Abu Sabeen) were investigated. In general, more green-chop yield was obtained from seed of both cultivars drilled in regular rows, double rows and triple rows than when traditionally sown as broadcast seed. Yields were greater when plants were sown at 70 kg seed ha−1 than when traditionally sown at 35 kg seed ha−1. These yield advantages were sustained through three successional harvests. Pioneer 988 generally yielded more than Abu Sabeen, especially when sown in January. Both cultivars gave minimum yield when sown in April, July or October.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacon, H. A. (1948). Crops of the Sudan. In Agriculture in the Sudan, 302400 (Ed. Tothill, J. D.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beuerlein, J. E., Fribourg, H. A. & Bell, F. F. (1968). Effects of environment and cutting on regrowth of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Crop Science 8:152155.Google Scholar
Burger, A. W. & Campbell, W. F. (1961). Effects of rates and methods of seeding on the original stand, tillering, stem diameter, leaf-stem ratio and yield of sudangrass. Agronomy Journal 53:289291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Karouri, M. O. A. & Mansi, M. G. (1980). Performance of sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) and maize (Zea mays) as forage in irrigated saline soils of the Sudan. Experimental Agriculture 16:431436.Google Scholar
Holt, E. C. (1965). Effect of cultural and management practices on sudangrass performance. Texas Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 1045:8.Google Scholar
Holt, E. C. (1970). Relationship of hybrid sudangrass plant population to plant growth characteristics. Agronomy Journal 62:494496.Google Scholar
Kambal, A. E. (1972). Performance of some local and introduced varieties of forage sorghum at Shambat. Sudan Agricultural Journal 7:1216.Google Scholar
Kiesselbach, T. A. & Anderson, A. (1925). Annual forage crops. Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 206.Google Scholar
Koller, H. A. & Scholl, J. M. (1968). Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on forage production and chemical composition of two sorghum cultivars harvested at two cutting frequencies. Agronomy Journal 60:456459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, F. C. & Laude, H. M. (1960). Effect of row spacing and plant population on performance of corn, grain sorghum and forage sorghum. Agronomy Journal 52:275277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, E. F. (1961). Effects of temperature and phosphorus fertilization on yield and composition of Piper sudangrass. Agronomy Journal 53:257258.Google Scholar