Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:33:45.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Regular Research Field Hearings (RRFH) in On-farm Trials in Northeast Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Greg Baker
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA, Cnp Caprinos, Caixa Postal 10, Sobral, Ceara, 62.100, Brazil
Hendrik C. Knipscheer
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA, Cnp Caprinos, Caixa Postal 10, Sobral, Ceara, 62.100, Brazil
Jose De Souza Neto
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA, Cnp Caprinos, Caixa Postal 10, Sobral, Ceara, 62.100, Brazil

Summary

The study of livestock in farming systems research presents several challenges. Factors such as the small number of observations, high statistical variability in measurements, and the difficulty in valuing non-market inputs and outputs make it difficult to evaluate on-farm research. Regular Research Field Hearings (RRFH) can improve communication between scientists and farmers, thereby increasing mutual understanding, willingness to collaborate in evaluation, potential technologies, and also improving test results. Of three groups of sheep and goat farmers involved in on-farm testing in northeast Brazil, the group which participated in RRFH experienced a significantly higher level of success with the technology as measured according to performance criteria such as weight gains and farmers' perceptions of their animals' performance. The results confirm the importance of farmers' participation in agricultural research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashby, J. A. (1986). Methodology for the participation of small farmers in the design of on-farm trials. Agricultural Administration 22:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J. A. (1987). The effects of different types of farmer participation on the management of on-farm trials. Agricultural Administration and Extension 24:235252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir, P. & Knipscheer, H. C. (1987). Application of the environment-behaviour-performance model in farming systems research - the case of small-ruminant technology transfer. Agricultural Administration and Extension 25:161176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. & Souza, Neto J. (1986). Characteristics, constraints, and technology recommendations for the smallholders at Saco do Belem. Proceedings of the First Workshop of the Small Ruminant-CRSP, Sobral, BrazilGoogle Scholar
Bemis, J. H. (1986). Communications and FSR/E: the inside slant. Paper for FSSP 5th Annual Research and Extension Symposium, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Bernsten, R. H., Fitzhugh, H. & Knipscheer, H. C. (1983). Livestock in farming systems research. Proceedings of the Third Annual Farming Systems Symposium, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.Google Scholar
Harwood, R. R. (1979). Small Farm Development. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Knipscheer, H. C. & Suradisastra, K. (1986). Farmer participation in Indonesian livestock farming systems by Regular Research Field Hearings (RRFH). Agricultural Administration 22:205216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabawonka, A. F. (1986). Economic evaluation of the Anambia/IMO(ANIMO) Rice Project in Nigeria. Agricultural Administration 22:149160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Sands D. (1986). Farming Systems Research: clarification of terms and concepts. Experimental Agriculture 22:87104.Google Scholar
Okali, C. & Knipscheer, H. C. (1985). Small-ruminant production in mixed farming systems, case studies in research design. Paper for FSSP 5th Annual Research and Extension Symposium, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Rohrbach, D. (1981). Issues in Developing and Implementing a Farming Systems Research Program. Washington, DC: Office of International Cooperation and Development, USDA.Google Scholar