Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T01:47:42.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Chlormequat on the Growth and Yield of Irrigated and Rainfed Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) in the Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. S. Saini ,
R. S. Jolly  and
O. S. Singh
J. S. Saini
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
R. S. Jolly
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
O. S. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of the field application of chlormequat on the growth, yield and seed oil content of Brassica juncea grown under irrigated and rainfed conditions was evaluated for three consecutive crop seasons. Foliar application at the flower initiation stage increased the number of primary branches, number and length of siliquae, weight of seeds and seed oil content. Chlormequat (50 AS) applied at 80 ml ha−1 increased seed yield by more than 50%. The increase was greater in unirrigated crops.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 319 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdelhadi, N., Prioul, J. L. & Bordu, R. (1980). Contrasting effects of CCC (2-Chloroethyl trimethyl-ammonium chloride) on photosynthetic gas exchange and carboxylase activities. Photosynthetica 14:437–440.Google Scholar
Brar, G. & Thies, W. (1977). Contribution of leaves, stem, siliqua and seeds to dry matter accumulation in ripening seeds of rape seed. Zeitschrift für Pflanzen Physiologie 82:1–13.Google Scholar
Gill, K. S. & Singh, O. S. (1978). Physiological response of dwarf wheats to chlorocholine chloride under soil moisture stress. Biologia Plantarum 20:421–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goring, H. & Koshuchowa, S. (1980). Influence of chlorocholine chloride and ethrel on chlorophyll and the ‘epinatic response’ of the primary leaf of wheat seedling. Biologia Plantarum 22:332–335.Google Scholar
Green, C. F. & Dawkins, T. C. K. & McDonald, H. G. (1985). Influence of chlorocholine chloride on grain growth of barley (Hordeum distichum L. cv. Igri) in the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 36:1126–1133.Google Scholar
Katyar, R. K., Saran, G. & Giri, G. (1986). Evaluation of Brassica carinata as a new oilseed crop in India. Experimental Agriculture 22:67–71.Google Scholar
Koranteng, G. O. & Matthews, S. (1982). Modifications of the development of spring barley by early applications of CCC and GA3 and the subsequent effects on yield components and yield. In Chemical Manipulation of Crop Growth and Development (Ed. Mcllaren, J. S.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Singh, P., Singh, D. P., Singh, H. & Sharma, H. C. (1984). Difference in osmoregulation in Brassica species. Annals of Botany 54:537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandya, R. B., Khan, M. I., Gupta, S. K. & Arora, S. K. (1974). Effect of cycocel on growth, yield and chemical composition of Brassica juncea Coss. Biochemical Physiol Pflanzen 165:283–289.Google Scholar
Rojowski, (1971). The effect of 2-chloroethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (CCC) and gibberellin (GA) on the winter hardiness and yield of winter rape. Zesz, Nauk, WSR I, Szezecinie 37:283–300.Google Scholar
Singh, D. P., Singh, P. & Singh, M. (1982a). Screening of genotypes of Brassica juncea for leaf conductance under field conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany 134:381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. P., Turner, N. C. & Rawson, H. M. (1982b). Effect of radiation, temperature and humidity on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of oilseed rape (Brassica campestris L.). Biologia Plantarum 24:130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, K. P. & Singh, A. B. (1974). A selection index for yield in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 44:129–141.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., De, R., Gangasaran, Turkhede, B. B. (1981). Dry land wheat yield as affected by soil application of fertilizer nitrogen and farm yard manure and foliar application of Kaolin and CCC. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 51:167–172.Google Scholar
Snedecor, C. W. & Cochran, W. C. (1967). Statistical Methods, Sixth Edition. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.Google Scholar
Treharne, R., Hewitt, E., Hoad, G. & Child, R. (1983). The bioregulation of wheat growth and yield. In Better British Wheat, 19–21 (Ed.Hardcastle, J.). London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Williams, P. H. & Hill, C. B. (1986). Rapid cycling populations of Brassica. Science 232:1385–1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed