Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:15:03.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MODELLING CROP–LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS FOR ACHIEVING FOOD SECURITY AND INCREASING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCIES IN THE ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

TILAHUN AMEDE  and
ROBERT J. DELVE
TILAHUN AMEDE
Affiliation:
African Highlands Initiative and International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
ROBERT J. DELVE*
Affiliation:
Tropical Soils Biology and Fertility Institute of the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (TSBF-CIAT), P.O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
*
‡Corresponding author: R.Delve@cgiar.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An action research process was conducted with communities in Gununo, southern Ethiopia (2000–2003), to develop alternative cropping strategies for achieving their food security and cash needs. Farmers identified three major production objectives depending on their household priorities and socio-economic status. In Group I, farmers are currently food insecure and want to produce enough food from their own farms. In Group II, they produce enough food but want to fulfil their financial needs. In Group III, farmers rely on off-farm activities and want to increase cash income. The current system mostly fulfils the nutritional requirement of Group II. Groups I and III were highly food deficit from their own farms, with production covering less than seven months per year and fulfilling <50% of the recommended daily allowances (RDA) for human nutrition. Using a linear programming optimization model, it was possible to fulfil the RDA of Group I by reallocating the cropping area of maize, sweet potato, coffee and wheat to potato, enset and kale in proportions of 50, 29 and 15%, respectively. To satisfy both financial and nutritional needs of Group II, an increase in the proportion of coffee and beans by about 29 and 7.3%, respectively, over the current land allocation was needed. This shift would triple their cash income. The cash income of Group III increased four-fold by full replacement of the cereals and root crops by coffee (48%) and teff (52%), though the total income was not enough to secure food security due to their small landholdings. In farms of Groups I and II, the shift to the suggested cropping will reduce soil erosion by about 40%, while it will have no effect on farms of Group III. This shift will reduce the quantity and quality of livestock feed, except for Group I. Moreover, it will increase the farm crop water requirement 17.5 and 37% in Groups I and III (resource poor households) and reduce it in resource rich households of Group II. These changes did not imply extra labour in any groups. Whilst this model can optimize systems for food security and cash income, its research for development value is in identifying possible intensification strategies for farming systems and their implications on the farming systems, rather than generating practical recommendations for all cropping systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 441 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amede, T., Belachew, T. and Geta, E. (2001). Reversing the degradation of arable land in the Ethiopian Highlands. Managing African Soils, 2001; No. 23. IIED-London.Google Scholar
Amede, T. and Taboge, E. (2007). Enhancing farmer innovation through manipulation of soil fertility gradients in enset systems. P. 289–297. In Improving Human Welfare and Environmental Conservation by Empowering Farmers to Combat Soil Fertility Degradation. (Ed. Bationo, A.) African Soils Network (AFNet). Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Amede, T., Stroud, A. and Aune, J. (2004). Advancing human nutrition without degrading land resources through modelling cropping systems in the Ethiopian Highlands. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 25:344–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonesmisza, E. (1982). Nitrogen cycling in coffee plantations. Plant and Soil 67:214–246.Google Scholar
EHNRI (1998). Food composition table for use in Ethiopia. Part IV. Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
FAO. (1990). Conducting Small-scale Nutrition Surveys: A Field Manual, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
FAO (2005). Local climate estimator (New LockClim 1.06). FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., Ingram, J. S. I., Anderson, R., Betts, R. A. and Brovkin, V. (2002). Environmental consequences of alternative practices for intensifying crop production. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 88:287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaluski, D. N., Einat-Ophir, E., and Amede, T. (2002). Food security and nutrition - The Ethiopian case for action. Public Health Nutrition 5:373–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, B. D., Bouldin, D. R., Urey, G. H. and Kizito, F. (2001). Modelling cropping strategies to improve human nutrition in Uganda. Agricultural Systems, 67:105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renault, D. and Wallender, W. W. (2000). Nutritional water productivity and diets. Agricultural Water Management 45:275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roggero, P. P. and Toderi, M. (2002). Impact of cropping systems on soil erosion in the clay hills of central Italy. Advances in Geo-ecology 35:471–480.Google Scholar
Shack, R. and Ertiro, C. (1995). A linear model for predicting enset plant yield and assessment of Kocho production in Ethiopia. UNDP, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Tsegaye, A. and Struik, P. C. (2002). Analysis of enset (Enset ventricosum) indigenous production methods and farm based biodiversity in major enset growing regions of Southern Ethiopia. Experimental Agriculture 38:291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) (1999). Review of drought nutrition response. UNICEF, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
WHO. (1999). WHO/FAO Expert Consultations. Handbook on Human Nutrient Requirements. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Zingore, S., Gonzalez-Estrada, E., Delve, R. J., Herrero, M., Dimes, J. P. and Giller, K. E. (2007). Evaluation of resource management options for African smallholder farms using an integrated modelling approach. Paper presented at the Farm System Design Conference, Italy, 2007.Google Scholar