Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:18:08.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiology, yield, and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated upland rice cultivars subjected to water stress at and after flowering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2022

Carlos Alberto Quiloango-Chimarro*
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Rubens Duarte Coelho
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Alexandre Bryan Heinemann
Affiliation:
Embrapa Rice and Beans, CEP 75375-000, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GO, Brazil
Rafael Gómez Arrieta
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Alice da Silva Gundim
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Ana Carolina Ferreira França
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo - “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Email: carlosqch1a@gmail.com

Summary

Water scarcity due to global warming can increase the water demand for upland rice at critical stages of crop development. However, there is little research on cultivar responses to this scenario and technologies that enhance water use efficiency (WUE). To determine the influence of water stress at and after flowering stages of drip-irrigated upland rice cultivars on physiology, yield, and WUE, a shelter experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement of treatments. Three modern and one traditional cultivar were subjected to five irrigation managements: 100% of the field capacity considered the reference management (RM), 70 and 40% of the RM at the flowering stage, and 70 and 40% of the RM at the grain-filling stage. In general, the modern cultivars tended to maintain higher photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration, leaf water potential, and lower crop water stress index compared to the traditional cultivar under water stress. The WUE decreased for all cultivars under severe stress, averaging 0.55 and 0.62 kg m−3 when stress occurred at flowering and grain-filling, respectively, whereas moderate stress imposed at grain-filling maintained WUE for all cultivars, averaging 1.21 kg m−3. In addition, grain yield (GY) showed a similar variation trend under drought stress as WUE, and its reduction was mainly associated with low filled grain percentage. Among the five irrigation treatments, both GY and WUE were the highest in the RM; the best cultivar recorded 9.3 Mg ha−1 and 1.62 kg m−3, respectively. Findings suggest that attending to the full water demand under precision drip irrigation and appropriate cultivar selection can enhance upland rice production at significant levels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, J., Hussain, S. (2021). Rice Improvement. Singapore: Springer Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Alou, I.N., Steyn, J.M., Annandale, J.G. and van der Laan, M. (2018). Growth, phenological, and yield response of upland rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nerica 4®) to water stress during different growth stages. Agricultural Water Management 198: 3952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. de C. F., Habermann, G., Crusciol, C.A.C., Nascente, A.S. and Rodrigues, J.D. (2015). Leaf gas exchange and yield of three upland rice cultivars. Bragantia 74: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnabás, B., Jäger, K., and Fehér, A. (2008). The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell and Environment 31: 1138.Google ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B.M. and Walker, S.C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belder, P., Bouman, B.A.M., Spiertz, J.H.J., Peng, S., Castaneda, A.R. and Visperas, R.M. (2005). Crop performance, nitrogen and water use in flooded and aerobic rice. Plant and Soil 273: 167182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bian, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Chen, H., Cui, C., Li, X., Chen, S. and Fu, Q. (2019). Simplified evaluation of cotton water stress using high resolution unmanned aerial vehicle thermal imagery. Remote Sensing 11: 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biju, S., Fuentes, S. and Gupta, D. (2018). The use of infrared thermal imaging as a non-destructive screening tool for identifying drought-tolerant lentil genotypes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 127: 1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blum, A. (2009). Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Research 112: 119123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonjung, H. and Fukai, S. (1996). Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on rice growth and yield under upland conditions. 2. Phenology, biomass production and yield. Field Crops Research 48: 4755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, B.A.M., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T.P. and Barker, R. (2007). Rice and water. Advances in Agronomy 92: 187237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, J.D.O., Coelho, R.D., Barros, T.H.D.S., Fraga Júnior, E.F., and Fernandes, A.L.T. (2020). Canopy thermal response to water deficit of coffee plants under drip irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage 69: 472482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusciol, C.A.C., Soratto, R.P., Nascente, A.S. and Arf, O. (2013). Root distribution, nutrient uptake, and yield of two upland rice cultivars under two water regimes. Agronomy Journal 105: 237247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingkuhn, M., Datta, S. De K., Dörffling, K. and Javellana, C. (1989). Varietal differences in leaf water potential, leaf net CO2 assimilation, conductivity and water use efficiency in upland rice. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40: 11831192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, E.B., Cavalcanti, P.P. and Nogueira, D.A. (2013). Experimental designs package. Applied Mathematics 5: 29522958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, A.B., Barrios-Perez, C., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Arango-Londoño, D., Bonilla-Findji, O., Medeiros, J.C. and Jarvis, A. (2015). Variation and impact of drought-stress patterns across upland rice target population of environments in Brazil. Journal of Experimental Botany 66: 36253638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinemann, A.B., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Nascente, A.S., Zeviani, W.M., Stone, L.F. and Sentelhas, P.C. (2017). Upland rice cultivar responses to row spacing and water stress across multiple environments. Experimental Agriculture 53: 609626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, A.B., Stone, L.F. and Fageria, N.K. (2011). Transpiration rate response to water deficit during vegetative and reproductive phases of upland rice cultivars. Scientia Agricola 68: 2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idso, S.B. (1982). Non-water-stressed baselines: a key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress. Agricultural Meteorology 27: 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagadish, K.S.V., Kavi Kishor, P.B., Bahuguna, R.N., von Wirén, N. and Sreenivasulu, N. (2015). Staying alive or going to die during terminal senescence — an enigma surrounding yield stability. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farooq, M., Al-Juburi, H.J., Somasundaram, R., and Panneerselvam, R. (2009). Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11: 100105.Google Scholar
Kang, S., Hao, X., Du, T., Tong, L., Su, X., Lu, H., Li, X., Huo, Z., Li, S. and Ding, R. (2017). Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: from research to practice. Agricultural Water Management 179: 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y., Kamoshita, A. and Yamagishi, J. (2006). Growth of three rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) under upland conditions with different levels of water supply 2. Grain yield. Plant Production Science 9: 435445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y. and Katsura, K. (2014). Rice adaptation to aerobic soils: physiological considerations and implications for agronomy. Plant Production Science 17: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y., Okami, M. and Katsura, K. (2009). Yield potential and water use efficiency of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Japan. Field Crops Research 113: 328334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A., Nayak, A.K., Pani, D.R. and Das, B.S. (2017). Physiological and morphological responses of four different rice cultivars to soil water potential based deficit irrigation management strategies. Field Crops Research 205: 7894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanna, A.C., Coelho, G.R.C., Moreira, A.S., Terra, T.G.R., Brondani, C., Saraiva, G.R., Lemos da, F. S., Guimarães, P.H.R., Júnior, O.P.M. and Vianello, R.P. (2020). Upland rice: phenotypic diversity for drought tolerance. Scientia Agricola 78: 114.Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2019). Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.3.5.1. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans Google Scholar
Liu, H., Hussain, S., Zheng, M., Peng, S., Huang, J., Cui, K. and Nie, L. (2015). Dry direct-seeded rice as an alternative to transplanted-flooded rice in Central China. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35: 285–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, L., Mei, H., Yu, X., Xia, H., Chen, L., Liu, H., Zhang, A., Xu, K., Wei, H., Liu, G., Wang, F., Liu, Y., Ma, X., Lou, Q., Feng, F., Zhou, L., et al. (2019). Water-Saving and drought-resistance rice: from the concept to practice and theory. Molecular Breeding 39: 115.Google Scholar
Medrano, H., Tomás, M., Martorell, S., Flexas, J., Hernández, E., Rosselló, J., Pou, A., Escalona, J.M. and Bota, J. (2015). From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies: limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. Crop Journal 3: 220228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, A. and Arita, N. (2020). Deep rooting development and growth in upland rice NERICA induced by subsurface irrigation. Plant Production Science 23: 211219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morillas, L., Hund, S.V. and Johnson, M.S. (2019). Water use dynamics in double cropping of rainfed upland rice and irrigated melons produced under drought-prone tropical conditions. Water Resources Research 55: 41104127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascente, A.S. and Stone, L.F. (2018). Cover crops as affecting soil chemical and physical properties and development of upland rice and soybean cultivated in rotation. Rice Science 25, 340349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Toole, J.C. and Moya, T.B. (1981). Water deficits and yield in upland rice. Field Crops Research 4: 247259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohsumi, A., Kanemura, T., Homma, K., Horie, T. and Shiraiwa, T. (2007). Genotypic variation of stomatal conductance in relation to stomatal density and length in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Production Science 10: 322328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olalekan Suleiman, S., Gajere Habila, D., Mamadou, F., Mutiu Abolanle, B. and Nurudeen Olatunbosun, A. (2022). Grain yield and leaf gas exchange in upland NERICA rice under repeated cycles of water deficit at reproductive growth stage. Agricultural Water Management 264: 107507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, L., Monteiro, M., Petter, F., Nóbrega, J. and Santos, A. (2017). Biomass and nutrient cycling by cover crops in Brazilian Cerrado in the State of Piaui. Revista Caatinga 30: 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, B.D.S., Castro, E.D.M.D. and Guimarães, C.M. (2006). Sustainability and profitability of aerobic rice production in Brazil. Field Crops Research 97: 3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raij, B., Cantarella, H., Quaggio, J.A. and Furlani, A.M.C. (1997). Fertilization and liming recommendations for the state of São Paulo. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico.Google Scholar
Ramirez-Villegas, J., Heinemann, A.B., Pereira de Castro, A., Breseghello, F., Navarro-Racines, C., Li, T., Rebolledo, M.C. and Challinor, A.J. (2018). Breeding implications of drought stress under future climate for upland rice in Brazil. Global Change Biology 24: 20352050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, K., Asai, H., Zhao, D., Laborte, A.G. and Grenier, C. (2018). Progress in varietal improvement for increasing upland rice productivity in the tropics. Plant Production Science, 21: 145158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, E.E. (2013). Land use expansion in the Brazilian. In Hosono, A., Hamaguchi, N. and Bojanic, A. (eds), Innovation with Spatial Impact: Sustainable Development of the Brazilian Cerrado. Singapore: Springer Cham, pp. 137162.Google Scholar
Sehgal, A., Sita, K., Siddique, K.H.M., Kumar, R., Bhogireddy, S., Varshney, R.K., Hanumantha Rao, B., Nair, R.M., Prasad, P.V.V. and Nayyar, H. (2018). Drought or/and heat-stress effects on seed filling in food crops: impacts on functional biochemistry, seed yields, and nutritional quality. Frontiers in Plant Science 871: 119.Google Scholar
Shah, F., Huang, J., Cui, K., Nie, L., Shah, T., Chen, C. and Wang, K. (2011). Impact of high-temperature stress on rice plant and its traits related to tolerance. Journal of Agricultural Science 149: 545556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharda, R., Mahajan, G., Siag, M., Singh, A. and Chauhan, B.S. (2017). Performance of drip-irrigated dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) in South Asia. Paddy and Water Environment 15: 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, L., Dalal, M., Verma, R.K., Kumar, S.V.V., Yadav, S.K., Pushkar, S., Kushwaha, S.R., Bhowmik, A. and Chinnusamy, V. (2018). Auxin protects spikelet fertility and grain yield under drought and heat stresses in rice. Environmental and Experimental Botany 150: 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, S., Brueck, H. and Asch, F. (2012). Chlorophyll index, photochemical reflectance index and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of rice leaves supplied with different N levels. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 113: 713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, B., Reddy, K.R., Redoña, E.D. and Walker, T. (2017). Screening of rice cultivars for morpho-physiological responses to early-season soil moisture stress. Rice Science 24, 322335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, L.F., Silveira da, P.M., Moreira, J.A.A. and Yokoyama, L.P. (1999). Rice nitrogen fertilization under supplemental sprinkler irrigation. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 34: 926932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Y., Zhang, Y., Jin, X., Saiz, G., Jing, R., Guo, L., Liu, M., Shi, J., Zuo, Q. and Tao, H. (2015). More rice with less water–evaluation of yield and resource use efficiency in ground cover rice production system with transplanting. European Journal of Agronomy 68: 1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Genuchten, M.T. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44: 892898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijayaraghavareddy, P., Xinyou, Y., Struik, P.C., Makarla, U. and Sreeman, S. (2020). Responses of lowland, upland and aerobic rice genotypes to water limitation during different phases. Rice Science 27: 345354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Wang, B., Chen, L., Li, P. and Cao, C. (2019). The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Scientific Reports 9: 112.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhao, B., Kondo, M., Maeda, M., Ozaki, Y. and Zhang, J. (2004). Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in two cultivars of upland rice during different developmental stages under three water regimes. Plant and Soil 261: 6175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Quiloango-Chimarro et al. supplementary material

Quiloango-Chimarro et al. supplementary material

Download Quiloango-Chimarro et al. supplementary material(File)
File 791.4 KB