Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:31:41.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SIXTY YEARS OF BREEDING IN CAMEROON IMPROVED FIBRE BUT NOT SEED COTTON YIELD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2016

ROMAIN LOISON*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-34398, Montpellier, France
ALAIN AUDEBERT
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France
JEAN-LOUIS CHOPART
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-34398, Montpellier, France CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
PHILIPPE DEBAEKE
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR AGIR, CS 52627, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France
DOMINIQUE DESSAUW
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-34398, Montpellier, France
JEAN-PAUL GOURLOT
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-34398, Montpellier, France
ERIC GOZÉ
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-34398, Montpellier, France
JANINE JEAN
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-34398, Montpellier, France
EDWARD GÉRARDEAUX
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UPR AÏDA, F-34398, Montpellier, France
*
Corresponding author. Email: romain.loison@cirad.fr

Summary

Seed cotton yield in Northern Cameroon has been declining since the 80s despite breeding efforts. In order to evaluate the impact of genetic improvement on this decline, we conducted field experiments in two locations with 10 widely grown cotton cultivars released in Cameroon between 1950 and 2009. The rate of genetic gain (GG) was estimated with a linear regression of the cultivar mean on its year of release (YR). Contrasts between rates of GG observed with different planting dates were estimated and tested. Our results revealed a rate of GG on fibre yield of 3.3 kg ha−1 year−1 due to increased ginning out-turn (3.9% and 6.2% in 60 years in Garoua and Maroua, respectively). There was no GG on leaf area index (LAI), radiation use efficiency (RUE), aerial biomass, harvest index and on seed cotton yield. We concluded that cotton breeding efforts in Cameroon have successfully improved cotton fibre yield but there is still some room for seed cotton yield improvement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badu-Apraku, B., Oyekunle, M., Menkir, A., Obeng-Antwi, K., Yallou, C. G., Usman, I. S. and Alidu, H. (2013). Comparative performance of early-maturing maize cultivars developed in three eras under drought stress and well-watered environments in West Africa. Crop Science 53:12981311.Google Scholar
Baffes, J. and Bank, W. (2004). Cotton: Market Setting, Trade Policies, and Issues. Washington, USA: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Beyene, Y., Semagn, K., Mugo, S., Tarekegne, A., Babu, R., Meisel, B., Sehabiague, P., Makumbi, D., Magorokosho, C., Oikeh, S., Gakunga, J., Vargas, M., Olsen, M., Prasanna, B. M., Banziger, M. and Crossa, J. (2015). Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection in eight bi-parental maize populations under drought stress. Crop Science 55:154163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, D. (1996). Testing cotton seed coat quality. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN. 623–624.Google Scholar
Brodrick, R., Bange, M. P., Milroy, S. P. and Hammer, G. L. (2013). Physiological determinants of high yielding ultra-narrow row cotton: Canopy development and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research 148:8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. T., Chee, P. W., Lubbers, E., Bowman, D. T., Meredith, W. R., Johnson, J. and Fraser, D. E. (2011). Genetic improvement of the pee dee cotton germplasm collection following seventy years of plant breeding. Crop Science 51:955968.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. T., Chee, P. W., Lubbers, E., Bowman, D. T., Meredith, W. R., Johnson, J., Fraser, D. E., Bridges, W. and Jones, D. C. (2012). Dissecting genotype × environment interactions and trait correlations present in the pee dee cotton germplasm collection following seventy years of plant breeding. Crop Science 52:690699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, T.-V., Oumarou, P., Gawrysiak, G., Klassou, C. and Hau, B. (2011). Short-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) may be a suitable response to late planting in sub-Saharan regions. Field Crops Research 120:920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. and Edmeades, G. O. (2010). Breeding and cereal yield progress. Crop Science 50:S85–S98.Google Scholar
Gérardeaux, E., Sultan, B., Palaï, O., Guiziou, C., Oettli, P. and Naudin, K. (2013). Positive effect of climate change on cotton in 2050 by CO2 enrichment and conservation agriculture in Cameroon. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33:485495.Google Scholar
Kamara, A. Y., Tefera, H., Ewansiha, S. U., Ajeigbe, H. A., Okechukwu, R., Boukar, O. and Omoigui, L. O. (2011). Genetic gain in yield and agronomic characteristics of cowpea cultivars developed in the Sudan savannas of Nigeria over the past three decades. Crop Science 51:18771886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konvalina, P., Capouchova, I. and Stehno, Z. (2012). Agronomically important traits of emmer wheat. Plant, Soil and Environment 58:341346.Google Scholar
Levrat, R. (2010). Cash crop and rural development: Example from cotton in northern cameroon since 1950 (in French), Ed. L'Harmattan, Paris. EAN: 9782296250451. 103–130.Google Scholar
Liu, S. M., Constable, G. A., Reid, P. E., Stiller, W. N. and Cullis, B. R. (2013). The interaction between breeding and crop management in improved cotton yield. Field Crops Research 148:4960.Google Scholar
M'Biandoun, M. and Olina, J. P. (2006). Rain fall patterns in the soudano-sahelian region of northern Cameroon: Consequences on agriculture (in French). Agronomie Africaine 18:95103.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. and Moss, C. J. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:277294.Google Scholar
Naudin, K., Gozé, E., Balarabe, O., Giller, K. E. and Scopel, E. (2010). Impact of no tillage and mulching practices on cotton production in North Cameroon: A multi-locational on-farm assessment. Soil & Tillage Research 108:6876.Google Scholar
Plaut, Z. and Federman, E. (1991). Acclimation of CO2 assimilation in cotton leaves to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiology 97:515522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, M., Ullah, I., Ahsraf, M., Stewart, J. M. and Zafar, Y. (2008). Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in cotton. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28:439447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochester, I. J. and Constable, G. A. (2015). Improvements in nutrient uptake and nutrient use-efficiency in cotton cultivars released between 1973 and 2006. Field Crops Research 173:1421.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. M. and Smith, C. W. (2008). Genetic gain in yield potential of upland cotton under varying plant densities. Crop Science 48:601605.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Collakova, E., Isleib, T. G., Welbaum, G. E., Tallury, S. P. and Balota, M. (2014). Differential physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress of peanut cultivars and breeding lines. Crop Science 54:22622274.Google Scholar
Sultan, B., Bella-Medjo, M., Berg, A., Quirion, P. and Janicot, S. (2010). Multi-scales and multi-sites analyses of the role of rainfall in cotton yields in West Africa. International Journal of Climatology 30:5871.Google Scholar