Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:34:18.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE WATER RELATIONS AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS OF OIL PALM (ELAEIS GUINEENSIS): A REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2011

M. K. V. CARR
M. K. V. CARR*
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK
*
†Address for correspondence: Pear Tree Cottage, Frog Lane, Ilmington, Shipston on Stour, Warwickshire, CV36 4LQ, UK. Email: mikecarr@cwms.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of research on the water relations and irrigation need of oil palm are collated and summarized in an attempt to link fundamental studies on crop physiology to drought mitigation and irrigation practices. Background information is given on the centres of origin (West Africa) and of production of oil palm (Malaysia and Indonesia), but the crop is now moving into drier regions. The effects of water stress on the development processes of the crop are summarized followed by reviews of its water relations, water use and water productivity. The majority of the recent research published in the international literature has been conducted in Malaysia and in Francophone West Africa. The unique vegetative structure of the palm (stem and leaves) together with the long interval between flower initiation and the harvesting of the mature fruit (ca. three years) means that causal links between environmental factors (especially water) and yield are difficult to establish. The majority of roots are found in the 0–0.6 m soil horizons, but roots can reach depths greater than 5 m and spread laterally up to 25 m from the trunk. The stomata are a sensitive indicator of plant water status and play an important role in controlling water loss. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis are negatively correlated with the saturation deficit of the air. It is not easy to measure the actual water use of oil palm, the best estimates for mature palms suggesting crop evapotranspiration (ETc) rates of 4–5 mm d−1 in the monsoon months (equivalent to 280–350 l palm−1 d−1). For well-watered mature palms, crop coefficient (Kc) values are in the range 0.8–1.0. Although the susceptibility of oil palm to drought is well recognized, there is a limited amount of reliable data on actual yield responses to irrigation. The best estimates are 20–25 kg fresh fruit bunches ha−1 mm−1 (or a yield loss of about 10% for every 100 mm increase in the soil water deficit). These increases are only realized in the third and subsequent years after the introduction of irrigation and follow an increase in the number of fruit bunches as a result of an improvement in the sex ratio (female/total inflorescence production) and a reduction in the abortion of immature inflorescences. There is no agreement on the allowable depletion of the available soil water, or on the associated optimum irrigation interval. Drip irrigation has been used successfully on oil palm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 629 - 652
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Bénard, G. and Daniel, C. (1971). Économie de l'eau en jeunes palmeraies sélectionnéees du Dahomey castration et sol nu. Oléagineux 26:225–232.Google Scholar
Burgess, P. J. (1992). Response of tea clones to drought in southern Tanzania. PhD thesis, Cranfield University, UK.Google Scholar
Caliman, J. P. (1992). Palmier à huile et déficit hydrique production, techiques culturales adaptées. Oléagineux 47:205–216.Google Scholar
Caliman, J. P. and Southworth, A. (1998). Effect of drought and haze on the performance of oil palm. In Proceedings of 1998 International Oil Palm Conference ‘Commodity of the Past, Today and the Future’, (Ed. Jatmika, A.), Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute, Medan, Indonesia, 250–274.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (2001). The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee. Experimental Agriculture 37:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (2009). The water relations and irrigation requirements of banana (Musa spp.). Experimental Agriculture 45:333–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (2010a). The role of water in the growth of the tea (Camellia sinensis L.) crop: a synthesis of research in eastern Africa. 1. Plant water relations. Experimental Agriculture 46:329–349.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (2010b). The role of water in the growth of the tea (Camellia sinensis L.) crop: a synthesis of research in eastern Africa. 2. Water productivity. Experimental Agriculture 46:351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (2011). The water relations and irrigation requirements of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): a review. Experimental Agriculture 47:27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. and Knox, J. W. (2011). The water relations and irrigation requirements of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.): a review. Experimental Agriculture 47:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaillard, H., Daniel, C., Houeto, V. and Ochs, R. (1983). L'irrigation du palmier à huile et du cocotier. Expérience sur 900 ha en République populaire du Benin. Oléagineux 38:519–529.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1973). Midday closure of stomata in the oil palm in Malaysia. MARDI Research Bulletin 1:1–4.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1976a). The Genus Elaeis. In Oil Palm Research, 3–5 (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. (1976b). Photosynthesis and productivity. In Oil Palm Research, 55–76, (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H.V. (1985). Yield potentials of plantation crops. In Potassium in the Agricultural Systems of the Humid Tropics, Proceedings of the 19th Colloquium of the International Potash Institute, Switzerland, Berne, 61–80.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H.V. (1996). Irrigation of oil palms – a review. Journal of Plantation Crops 24 (supplement):45–52.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. and Gray, B. S. (1976). Growth and morphology. In Oil Palm Research, 77–86 (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. and Gray, B. S. (1976b). Yield and yield components. In Oil Palm Research, 77–86 (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H.V. and Hong, T. K. (1982). Irrigation of oil palms in Malaysia. In The Oil Palm in Agriculture in the Eighties, Vol. 2, 343–346 (Eds. Pushparajah, E. and Chew, P S.), Kuala Lumpur: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Corley, R. H. V. and Tinker, P. B. (2003). The Oil Palm (4th Edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, O., Frêre, J. L., Caliman, J. P. and Horns, P. (1988). Présentation d'une méthode simplifée de prévision de la production d'une plantation de palmiers à huile à partir de la climatologie. Oléagineux 43:271–278.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, E. (1989). Photosynthèse, consummation en eau et modèlisation de la production chez le palmier à huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Thesis, Universite de Paris-Sud, Orsay.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, E., Dubos, B., Rey, J., Quencez, P. and Sauugier, B. (1992). Changes in evapotranspiation from an oil palm stand (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) exposed to seasonal water deficit. Acta Oecologia 13:299–314.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, E. and Saugier, B. (1993). Gas exchange of oil palm in relation to light, vapour pressure deficit, temperature and leaf age. Functional Ecology 7:97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT (2010). http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancorGoogle Scholar
Foong, S. F. (1993). Potential evapotranspiration, potential yield and leaching losses of oil palm. In Proceedings of 1991 PORIM International Palm Oil Conference, Module-Agriculture. Palm Oil Research Institute, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 105–119.Google Scholar
Gerritsma, W. and Wessel, M. (1997). Oil palm: domestication achieved? Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 45:463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardon, J. J. (1995). Oil palm Elaeis guineensis (Palmae). In Evolution of Crop Plants 2nd Edition, 395–399 (Eds. Smart, J. and Simmonds, N. W.). Harlow, UK: Longmans.Google Scholar
Hartley, C. W. S. (1988). The Oil Palm (3rd edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (1991a). Age-related changes in stomatal and photosynthetic characteristics of leaves of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Elaeis 3:336–348.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (1991b). Limitations to gas exchange, growth and yield of young oil palm by soil water supply and atmospheric humidity. Transactions of the Malaysian Society of Plant Physiology 2:39–45.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (1991c). Use of leaf temperature measurements for detection of stress conditions in oil palm. Transactions of the Malaysian Society of Plant Physiology 2:51–57.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (1995). Carbon assimilation, water-use and energy balance of an oil palm plantation assessed using micrometeorlogical techniques. In Proceedings 1993 PORIM International Palm Oil Conference – Agriculture, (Ed. Basiron, Y.). Palm Oil Research Institute, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 137–158.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (1998). Notes on oil palm productivity. III. The use of sap flux probes to monitor palm responses to environmental conditions. Journal of Oil Palm Research 10:39–44.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (1999). Notes on oil palm productivity. IV. Carbon dioxide gradients and evapotranspiration, above and below the canopy. Journal of Oil Palm Research 11:33–40.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (2006). Modelling the impact of some oil palm crop management options. MPOB Technology 29:52–59.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (2009a). Oil palm: ecophysiology of growth and production. In Ecophysiology of Tropical Tree Crops, 253–286 (Ed. DaMatta, F.) Hauppauge NY, USA: New Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. (2009b). Comparative ecophysiology of oil palm and tropical rain forest. In Sustainable Production of Palm Oil – a Malaysian Experience, 1–51 (Eds. Singh, G., Lim, K. H. and Chan, K. W.) Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Palm Oil Association.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. and Chang, K. C. (1990). Evidence for water as a factor limiting performance of field palms in West Malaysia. In Proceedings of 1989 PORIM International Palm Oil Development Conference – Agriculture. Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 487–498.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. and Chang, K. C. (2000). Oil palm productivity and its component processes. In Advances in Oil Palm Research - Volume 1, 97–145 (Eds. Basion, Y., Jalani, B. S. and Chan, K. W.), Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Palm Oil Board.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. and Harun, M. H. (2005). The influence of climatic conditions on gas and energy exchanges above a young oil palm stand in north Kedah, Malaysia. Journal of Oil Palm Research 17:73–91.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. and Harun, M. H. (2007). Short-term responses of oil palm to an interrupted dry season in north Kedah, Malaysia. Journal of Oil Palm Research 19:364–372.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E., Harun, M. H. and Chang, K. C. (2008). Some observations on the effects of high water tables and flooding on oil palm, and a preliminary model of oil palm water balance and use in the presence of a high water table. Oil Palm Bulletin 56:14–22.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E., Jamil, Z. M. and Dolmat, M. T. (1992). Regulation of gas exchange and abscisic acid concentrations in young oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Transactions of the Malaysian Society of Plant Physiology 3:29–34.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E., Noor, M. R.M., Harun, M. H., Yahya, Z. and Mustakim, S. N. A. (2005). Stress development and its detection in young oil palms in North Kedah Malaysia. Journal of Oil Palm Research 17:11–26.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E., Yahya, Z., Noor, M. R. M., Harun, M. H. and Mohammed, A. T. (2007). Predicting soil water status, evapotranspiration, growth and yield of young oil palm in a seasonally dry region of Malaysia. Journal of Oil Palm Research 19:398–415.Google Scholar
Hong, T. K. and Corley, R. H.V. (1976). Leaf temperature and photosynthesis of a tropical C3 plant. Elaeis guineensis. MARDI Research Bulletin 4:16–20.Google Scholar
Jourdan, C. and Rey, H. (1997a). Architecture and development of the oil palm (Elaeis guinensis Jacq.) root system. Plant and Soil 189:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, C. and Rey, H. (1997b). Modelling and simulation of the architecture and development of the oil palm (Elaeis guinensis Jacq.) root system. Plant and Soil 190:235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallarackal, J., Jeyakumar, P. and George, S. J. (2004). Water use of irrigated oil palm at three different arid locations in peninsular India. Journal of Oil Palm Research 16:45–53.Google Scholar
Lamade, E. and Setiyo, E. (1996). Variation in maximum photosynthesis of oil palm in Indonesia: comparison of three morphologically contrasting clones. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 3:429–435.Google Scholar
Lamade, E., Setiyo, E. and Purba, A. (1998). Gas exchange and carbon allocation of oil palm seedlings submitted to water logging in interaction with N fertiliser application. In Proceedings of the 1998 International Oil Palm Conference. Commodity of the Past, Today and the Future, (Eds. Jatmika, A., Bangun, D., Asmono, D., Sutarta, E. S., Pamin, K., Guritno, P., Prawirosukarto, S., Wakyono, T., Herawan, T., Hutomo, T., Darmosarkoro, W., Adiwiganda, Y. T., and Poeloengan, Z.). Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute, Medan, 573–584.Google Scholar
Legros, S., Mialet-Serra, I., Caliman, J. P., Siregar, F. A., Clement-Vidal, A. and Dingkuhn, M. (2009a). Phenology and growth adjustments of oil palm (Elaeis guinensis) to photoperiod and climate variability. Annals of Botany 104:1171–1182.Google Scholar
Legros, S., Mialet-Serra, I., Clement-Vidal, A., Caliman, J. P., Siregar, F. A., Fabre, D. and Dingkuhn, M. (2009b). Role of transitory carbon reserves during adjustment to climate variability and source-sink imbalances in oil palm (Oleis guineensis). Tree Physiology 29:1199–1211.Google Scholar
Lim, K. H., Goh, K-J., Kee, K. K. and Henson, I. E. (2008). Climatic requirements of the oil palm. Paper presented at Seminar on Agronomic Principles and Practices of Oil Palm Cultivation. The Agricultural Group Trust, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia, October 2008.Google Scholar
Maillard, G., Daniel, C. and Ochs, R. (1974). Analyse des effets de la sécheresse sur le palmier à huile. Oléagineux 29:397–404.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. N., Banabas, M., Scotter, D. R. and Webb, M. J. (2006). Using soil water depletion to measure spatial distribution of root activity in oil palm (Elaeis guinensis Jacq.) plantations. Plant and Soil 286:109–121.Google Scholar
Nouy, B., Baudouin, L., Dejégul, N. and Omoré, A. (1999). Le palmier à huile en conditions hydriques limitantes. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 6:31–45.Google Scholar
Ochs, R. and Daniel, C. (1976). Research on techniques adapted to dry regions. In Oil Palm Research, 315–330 (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.), Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Palat, T., Chayawat, N., Clendon, J. H. and Corley, R. H.V. (2009). A review of 15 years of oil palm irrigation research in Southern Thailand. International Journal of Oil Palm Research 6:146–154.Google Scholar
Palat, T., Smith, B. G. and Corley, R. H. V. (2000). Irrigation of oil palm in Southern Thailand. In Proceedings of the International Planters Conference; Plantation Crops in the New Millennium: The Way Ahead (Ed. Pushparajah, E.), Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Prioux, G., Jaquemard, J. C., Franqueville, H. de. and Caliman, J. P. (1992). Oil palm irrigation. Initial results obtained by PHCI (Ivory Coast). Oléagineux 47:497–509.Google Scholar
Radersma, S. and Ridder, N. de, (1996). Computed evapotranspiration of annual and perennial crops at different temporal and spatial scales using published parameter values. Agricultural Water Management 31:17–34.Google Scholar
Rao, V., Palat, T., Chayawat, N., and Corley, R. H.V. (2009). The Univanich oil palm breeding programme and progeny trial results from Thailand. International Journal of Oil Palm Research 6:50–60.Google Scholar
Rees, A. R. (1961). Midday closure of stomata in the oil palm Elaeis guineensis Jacq. Journal of Experimental Botany 12:129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, H., Quencez, P., Dufrêne, E. and Dubos, B. (1998). Profils hydriques et alimentation en eau du plumier à huile en Côte d'Ivoire. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 5:47–57.Google Scholar
Smith, B. G. (1989). The effects of soil water and atmospheric vapour pressure deficit on stomatal behaviour and photosynthesis in the oil palm. Journal of Experimental Botany 40:647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, G. R. (1984). Techniques in environmental physiology of oil palm. 2 Partitioning of rainfall above ground. PORIM Bulletin 12:12–31.Google Scholar
Taffin, G. de and Daniel, C. (1976). Premiers résultats d'un essai d'irrigation lente sur palmier à huile. Oléagineux 31:413–419.Google Scholar
Tinker, P. B. (1976). Soil requirements of the oil palm. In Oil Palm Research, 165–181 (Eds. Corley, R. H. V., Hardon, J. J. and Wood, B. J.), Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Turner, P. D. (1977). The effects of drought on oil palm yields in south-east Asia and the south Pacific region. In International Developments in Oil Palm, Proceedings of the Malaysian International Agricultural Oil Palm Conference (Eds. Earp, D. A. and Newall, W.), The Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur, 673–694.Google Scholar
Villalobos, E., Umaňa, C. H. and Chinchilla, Y. C. (1992). Estado de hidratación de la palma aceitera, en respuesta a la sequia en Costa Rica.Oléagineux 47:217–223.Google Scholar
Wormer, T. M. and Ochs, R. (1959). Humidité du sol, ouverture des stomates et transpiration du palmier à huile et de l'arachide. Oléagineux 14:571–580.Google Scholar
Yusop, Z., Chong, M. H., Garusu, G. J. and Ayob, K. (2008). Estimation of evapotranspiration in oil palm catchments by short-term period water-budget method. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 20:160–174.Google Scholar
Zeven, A. C. (1967). The semi-wild oil palm and its industry in Africa. Thesis, University of Wagneingen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar