Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:18:06.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of fetal chromosome aberrations from fetal DNA in maternal blood: has the challenge finally been met?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

Sinuhe Hahn*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine / Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Olav Lapaire
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Sevgi Tercanli
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Varaprasad Kolla
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine / Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Irene Hösli
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
*
*Corresponding author: Sinuhe Hahn, Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: shahn@uhbs.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The analysis of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis has been transformed by several recent profound technology developments. The most noteworthy of these are ‘digital PCR’ and ‘next-generation sequencing’ (NGS), which might finally deliver the long-sought goal of noninvasive detection of fetal aneuploidy. Recent data, however, indicate that NGS might even be able to offer a much more detailed appraisal of the fetal genome, including paternal and maternal inheritance of point mutations for mendelian disorders such as β-thalassaemia. Although these developments are very exciting, in their current form they are still too complex and costly, and will need to be simplified considerably for their optimal translation to the clinic. In this regard, targeted NGS does appear to be a step in the right direction, although this should be seen in the context of ongoing progress with the isolation of fetal cells and with proteomic screening markers.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011. Re-use permitted under a Creative Commons Licence – by-nc-sa

In the past few years it has become clear that the demographic shift towards increasing maternal age for pregnancies in developed nations, with its associated risks of fetal chromosomal anomalies, will necessitate a change in current strategies for prenatal screening and detection of fetal aneuploidies (Refs Reference Hahn, Jackson and Zimmermann1, Reference Bianchi2, Reference Ferguson-Smith and Bianchi3, Reference Lo4). This is illustrated by a recent analysis of the English and Welsh National Down Syndrome (DS) Cytogenetic Register over the period 1989–2008 (Ref. Reference Morris and Alberman5), which reported a 71% increase in the number of diagnosed cases with DS, with no comparable increase in birth rate. The increase in the number of cases with DS was largely attributed to the concomitant increase in maternal age, as more than 20% of pregnancies now occur in mothers older than 35 years (Ref. Reference Morris and Alberman5).

This development is likely to add additional costs to already strained healthcare budgets, because positive cases from initial noninvasive screening based on ultrascans and maternal serum biochemical analysis need to be verified by invasive analysis such as amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling, which are labour-intensive examinations requiring highly skilled personnel (Ref. Reference Philip6). To break this spiralling cost, it would be advantageous for any future noninvasive method to be so accurate that it could function as a ‘stand-alone’ test and not require further invasive verification. Naturally, it will also need to be considerably cheaper than current invasive practices. An alternative scenario might be to use such a noninvasive test to reduce the cost and risk associated with the invasive analysis of the high number of false-positive cases resulting from current screening practice (Refs Reference Chiu7, Reference Jackson and Pyeritz8). In either case, strenuous efforts will need to be undertaken in order to ensure that cost-effective noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of DS cases finally becomes a reality (Ref. Reference Jackson and Pyeritz8).

Has research in the field of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis become ‘mature’?

Since the discovery of fetal cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) in maternal plasma or serum in 1997 (Ref. Reference Lo9), more than 1000 papers have been published on this topic. A cursory review of publications listed in public depositories such as PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) suggests that the most prolific period was probably the latter half of the previous decade. In this period, several large-scale studies were initiated to test the efficacy of this new-found tool for the noninvasive determination of fetal genetic traits such as the fetal RhD (Rhesus D) gene or gender (Refs Reference van der Schoot, Hahn and Chitty10, Reference Chitty11, Reference Finning12, Reference Gautier13). These data indicated that this approach was indeed sufficiently robust that widespread clinical application could be safely implemented, and as a result concerted efforts were undertaken by multicentre consortia, such as the European Union (EU)-funded SAFE Network, to standardise these assays (Refs Reference Chitty11, Reference Maddocks14). These data also indicated that the analysis of cf-fetal DNA could form the secure and sound basis for subsequent developments, such as the noninvasive detection of fetal aneuploidies (Ref. Reference Lo15).

In recent years this prolific output in publications seems to have largely tapered off, although the number of reviews dealing with the field has increased tremendously. Hence the scenario appears very similar to economic models of the ‘product life cycle’, where a particular item has progressed through development, introduction and growth, and is settling into a pattern of maturity and subsequent decline (Ref. Reference Krentz and Pilskaln16). Although this simplistic view might lead to the impression that research in this field has waned, this is far from the truth, for this punctuated modicum in published reports indicates that the field has finally entered a phase where quality, using a quantum leap in technological development, rather than quantity is the prevailing trend. This facet will become very evident in this review.

The question of fetal cell-free DNA fragment size and concentration

It is necessary to reiterate that the major problem still hampering the use of fetal cf-DNA for the noninvasive detection of fetal genetic loci that are not distinct from maternal loci is that fetal sequences constitute only 5–10% of the total cf-DNA in maternal plasma, and even less in maternal serum (Refs Reference Lo17, Reference Zimmermann18, Reference Sikora19).

Groundbreaking research performed in the middle of the past decade on the biophysical properties of cf-DNA indicated that fetal cf-DNA was more fragmented and had a shorter size than comparable maternal cf-DNA fragments (Refs Reference Chan20, Reference Li21). Interestingly, this topic still continues to be the focus of intense research efforts and considerable debate (Refs Reference Hahn and Zimmermann22, Reference Fan23, Reference Lo24). The fragmentation was exploited for the selective enrichment of fetal cf-DNA sequences (to up to 50% of total cf-DNA), thereby permitting the detection of otherwise masked fetal genetic loci such as short tandem repeats, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and paternally inherited point mutations, such as those involved in β-thalassaemia or achondroplasia (Refs Reference Li21, Reference Li25, Reference Li26, Reference Li27, Reference Li28). These experiments, however, used conventional agarose gel electrophoresis for the physical-size-based separation of fetal and maternal cf-DNA species – a cumbersome, labour-intensive, inefficient procedure that is prone to contamination. For the widespread applicability of this approach in the clinic, new approaches such as microfluidics will be required.

Another key development during this period was verification of the long-standing suspicion that fetal cf-DNA was of placental origin, and was not the result of the demise of trafficking fetal cells. This was confirmed by a number of different approaches, such as analysis of (1) placental mosaicism, where key fetal loci such as the Y chromosome were missing both in the placenta and in fetal cf-DNA, but not in the male fetal karyotype (Ref. Reference Flori29), (2) molar pregnancies, where cf-DNA specific for the molar karyotype (46 XY) could be detected (Ref. Reference Alberry30), and (3) epigenetic markers specific for placental tissues, such as the hypomethylated maspin (SERPINB5) or the hypermethylated RASSF1 genetic loci (Refs Reference Chim31, Reference Chim32, Reference Chiu33).

The latter markers could prove to be useful as gender-independent tools to verify the presence of fetal cf-DNA in ambiguous diagnostic cases, such as when determining fetal gender or RhD status (Ref. Reference van der Schoot, Hahn and Chitty10). It might also be possible to use these as tools to quantify fetal cf-DNA levels (Ref. Reference Ehrich34). Reliable, accurate assessment of fetal cf-DNA levels, however, appears to require the use of high-copy sequences, such as DYS14 on the Y chromosome (Ref. Reference Zimmermann18).

Indirect methods for the noninvasive detection of fetal aneuploidy using cell-free nucleic acids

Allelic transcript ratios

The first indication that cell-free fetal nucleic acids could be used for the noninvasive prenatal detection of DS, in 2007, came from an indirect approach in which chromosomal dosage was inferred from allelic gene transcript copy numbers (Ref. Reference Lo35). The study focused on the gene PLAC4 (placenta-specific 4), located on chromosome 21, which was specifically transcribed in the placenta but not in any maternal tissues. In this manner, the analysis of this gene product would be similar to that of the Y chromosome, in that it would not be hindered by maternal background. To assess the dosage of each allelic transcript, heterozygous SNP loci were used. These could then be quantitatively assessed using mass spectrometry. In the analysis of samples from 10 DS cases and 56 healthy controls, DS cases could be detected with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 96.5%.

However, a serious caveat of this approach is that the SNP in PLAC4 needs to be heterozygous in order to derive a conclusion concerning chromosomal dosage. Hence, a very large number of cases had to be excluded from the study, because they failed to meet this important criterion. Furthermore, the approach makes a fundamental assumption concerning the underlying biology for it to work effectively – namely, that the interrogated alleles are transcribed at exactly the same rate. This might not be the case in many instances (Refs Reference Gandhi36, Reference Lionnet and Singer37), which would make subsequent analysis unreliable.

Although this RNA-based approach was subsequently explored by Sequenom, Inc., USA, it appears not to have been successful. Unfortunately, details of this study have not been divulged; it would have been interesting to determine the cause for its apparent failure, which perhaps could have been rectified in subsequent studies.

Epigenetic allelic ratios

A second indirect approach, which was explored around the same time, involved epigenetic differences of methylation to distinguish placental (fetal) genetic loci from maternal loci (Refs Reference Chim31, Reference Chim32, Reference Tong38, Reference Tong39, Reference Tsui40). The first report, on the maspin gene on chromosome 18 (Ref. Reference Tong38), again used heterozygous SNP alleles to determine chromosomal dosage; in this study, however, no clear distinction could be discerned between cases with trisomy 18 and unaffected healthy controls, even when using ‘pure’ fetal and maternal genetic material, such as fetal material obtained by amniocentesis. Subsequently, however, the epigenetic approach has been explored successfully for cases with trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome; ES) (Refs Reference Tong39, Reference Tsui40). In these recent studies much more encouraging results were obtained, in that all five DS cases and eight out of nine cases with ES were correctly identified by the analysis of epigenetic markers in plasma DNA. The efficacy of these assays might be improved by the inclusion of further candidate epigenetic biomarkers (Refs Reference Tong39, Reference Tsui40).

In a very recent report, it has been demonstrated that the enrichment of fetal cf-DNA fragments by methylated DNA immunoprecipitation can be used for the successful determination of chromosome 21 ploidy (Ref. Reference Papageorgiou41). In this study, hypermethylated fetal cf-DNA fragments, identified in a previous study (Ref. Reference Papageorgiou42), were enriched by immunoprecipitation and then examined by conventional real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The fetal-specific DNA methylation ratio for each sample was then calculated by comparing the sample CT (cycle threshold) value with the median CT value of a pool of normal control cases. In those cases where the fetus had a normal karyotype this ratio was determined to be of the order of 1, whereas in cases with trisomy 21 this ratio was larger than 1. To increase the accuracy of this system, eight methylated genetic regions on chromosome 21 were examined in parallel. In a blinded analysis, 14 cases with trisomy 21 could be correctly distinguished from 26 normal cases. The advantage of this system is that it does not require any specialised equipment, and can readily be performed by the instruments currently present in most routine diagnostic laboratories.

Digital PCR: first hint at direct noninvasive aneuploidy detection

Most of the studies examining fetal cf-DNA to date have used a form of real-time PCR and Y-chromosome-specific sequences (Refs Reference Lo17, Reference Zimmermann43). These studies indicated that the amount of fetal cf-DNA increases during gestation, and disappears rapidly from the maternal circulation following delivery. Increases were also observed in several pregnancy-related disorders or conditions such as preeclampsia, preterm delivery and trisomy 21, suggesting that this phenomenon could serve as the basis for a new generation of screening tests.

During this period, studies had indicated that real-time PCR could be used for the rapid determination of chromosomal ploidy on pure fetal genetic material obtained by invasive means (Ref. Reference Zimmermann44). Because real-time PCR is not well suited for the detection of less than twofold differences in template copy numbers, special conditions had to be introduced to detect the 1.5-fold difference in template concentration occurring in trisomy 21. It was, however, very clear that this approach would not be suited for the noninvasive determination of DS, because of the overwhelming presence of maternal cf-DNA fragments.

Consequently, a different tack had to be taken, which was provided by ‘digital PCR’ (Ref. Reference Vogelstein and Kinzler45) and the advent of microfluidic devices (Ref. Reference Zimmermann46). Unlike real-time PCR, where an ‘analogue’ signal of the entire PCR reaction containing the entire input template is obtained, in ‘digital PCR’ the PCR reaction is split into thousands of minute individual reactions, with each individual reaction containing at most a single template copy. A quantitative assessment of the concentration of input template in the sample examined is then made by counting the number of individual positive PCR reactions (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Detection of fetal aneuploidy using digital PCR. In this procedure, fluorescent PCR specific for sequences on chromosomes 12 and 21 is carried out in individual microreaction chambers. The amount of input template is titrated in such a fashion that each microreaction vessel contains >1 copy. After the plateau phase has been reached (approximately 40 cycles), the PCR reaction is terminated, and the number of positive reactions for each locus is counted. In euploid cases the ratio of blue (chromosome 12) to red (chromosome 21) signals should be 1, whereas in cases with Down syndrome the ratio of blue (chromosome 12) to red (chromosome 21) signals should be 1.5 (illustrated in more detail in Ref. Reference Zimmermann46). This method has to date not been successfully used for the detection of fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma.

This procedure has been demonstrated to permit a much more accurate quantification than more conventional approaches such as real-time PCR, but, more importantly, it permits the detection of very small changes in input DNA. Thus, ‘digital PCR’ could perhaps indicate whether a fetus was affected by DS, simply by counting the number of chromosome-21-specific target sequences in comparison to a similar locus on an unaffected chromosome (Refs Reference Zimmermann46, Reference Fan and Quake47, Reference Fan48, Reference Lo49) (Fig. 1).

A strategy in which the amyloid gene locus on chromosome 21 and the GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) gene locus on chromosome 12 were co-examined by digital PCR was shown to be able to detect DS when examining pure fetal genetic material obtained by invasive means (Ref. Reference Fan and Quake47) (Fig. 1). The report indicated that the method might also be suitable for the analysis of cf-DNA, in that ‘DS cases’ could be detected using artificial mixtures involving only 10% DS material, which is very similar to the concentration of fetal cf-DNA in maternal plasma. A crucial limitation of these observations, however, was that they would hold true only when 10 000 or more individual PCR reactions were monitored.

Next-generation sequencing and the possible advent of noninvasive DS detection

Although reports from two research groups indicated that digital PCR might offer success for the noninvasive detection of DS by the analysis of cf-DNA (Refs Reference Fan and Quake47, Reference Fan48, Reference Lo49), these studies also made it clear that these analyses would be conducted at the limits of current digital PCR platforms, which at the time offered some 12 000 individual reaction events. Hence, if this strategy were to be pursued, then its successful transition would require an even greater level of ‘individual event analysis’ to permit the necessary degree of discrimination between normal and DS cases.

This was offered by the advent of ‘next-generation sequencing (NGS)’, also termed ‘deep sequencing’, whereby the entire genomic template is fragmented, sequenced in short reads and then reassembled through complex bioinformatic comparison with a genomic database (Ref. Reference Ansorge50). In this manner, subtle mutations having key roles in tumour initiation and progression could be ascertained (Refs Reference Jones51, Reference Leary52).

Apart from offering unprecedented detail with regard to genomic alterations, the NGS approach also offered a unique opportunity to overcome the current limitation of digital PCR, by providing information concerning tens of thousands of sequence reads per chromosome; more than 60 000 reads might be recorded for chromosome 21, and many millions over the entire genome.

In the case of a DS fetus, there would be a small increase in the number of chromosome 21 reads, whereas there should not be any comparable alteration across the other chomosomes. As such, in a manner akin to digital PCR, by simply counting the number of chromosome 21 reads, and then comparing these to a much larger number of sequence reads over the entire genome, it should be possible to determine the ploidy of chromosome 21 (Fig. 2). This indeed was the case, and it was clearly demonstrated that even minute quantitative alterations in the number of chromosome 21 reads could lead to an unparalleled discrimination between pregnancies bearing a fetus with trisomy 21 or those with a normal karyotype (Refs Reference Chiu53, Reference Fan55). Furthermore, because this analysis was not restricted to chromosome 21, it was also possible to detect two cases with ES (trisomy 18) and one case with Patau syndrome (trisomy 13), thereby indicating the possible widespread applicability of this technology (Ref. Reference Fan55).

Figure 2. Detection of fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing. In this procedure the cell-free DNA fragments in maternal plasma are isolated, and a library with special sequence tags is then made. These tags permit subsequent multiplex analysis. The library is examined by next-generation sequencing, which determines the sequence of each and every fragment. By bioinformatic analysis these sequences are ascribed to chromosomal locations. Following this, the number of sequence reads for each chromosome is counted. For chromosome 21 this is typically of the order of several thousand reads, which can then be compared with several million reads spread across the genome. If the fetus is affected by Down syndrome, then slightly more reads will be recorded for chromosome 21 compared with those from a euploid fetus. By comparing these data with a bank of reference samples, and by the use of predetermined cut-off values (Z score), the ploidy of the sample being examined can be determined (described in more detail in Refs Reference Chiu53, Reference Chiu, Cantor and Lo54).

The downside of this approach is the prohibitively high cost per sample and the length of time taken for sample preparation, sequencing and subsequent bioinformatic analysis, which occupies the better part of several days per sample (Ref. Reference Lo and Chiu56).

Is NGS ready for clinical application?

Neverthless, two very recent publications have suggested that the NGS approach might be ready to make the transition from the research laboratory to clinical routine (Refs Reference Chiu7, Reference Jackson and Pyeritz8, Reference Ehrich34). In the first of these studies, 753 pregnant women at risk of having a fetus affected by DS, and who were therefore about to undergo an invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure, were recruited (Ref. Reference Chiu7); of these, full karyotyping determined that 86 had a fetus affected by DS. To reduce the complexity and cost of the NGS analysis, a multiplex approach was tested, whereby eight samples were examined in parallel (8-plex). This was compared with a more costly duplex analysis on 314 samples (two samples examined simultaneously). The 8-plex analysis yielded a sensitivity of 79.1% and a specificity of 98.9%, whereas the duplex assay yielded 100% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity (Ref. Reference Chiu7). To make the assay more efficient, a cohort of normal samples was used as a standard, permitting a threshold cut-off value (termed Z) to be determined: values above this were deemed to show DS cases (Fig. 2).

Although it is unfortunate that the duplex analysis was determined to be superior to the less complex 8-plex analysis, it is not entirely surprising, in that for the 8-plex assay only approximately 300 000 total reads were recorded per sample. This translates to a small fraction of the billions of reads required to access the entire genome, and furthermore implies that perhaps less than 10 000 chromosome-21-specific reads were recorded. Because the NGS assay, like its digital PCR predecessor, relies simply on the counting of individual events, it would seem that here simply too few single events were being interrogated.

In the second, independent study, 449 samples were examined by a more detailed and robust pair-end 4-plex NGS procedure in which approximately 5 million reads per sample were obtained (Ref. Reference Ehrich34). In this examination all 39 cases with DS were correctly identified, although one normal case was incorrectly classified as DS, thereby yielding 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity. An important quality control in this study is that the concentration of fetal cf-DNA was monitored, and samples with less than 3.9% were excluded (Ref. Reference Ehrich34).

Even if the NGS assays are considered not to be 100% effective, and could not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic test for DS, it has been suggested that their use as a secondary-tier screen of high-risk cases could lead to a 98% reduction in the number of invasive procedures (Ref. Reference Chiu7). As such, this avenue certainly does appear to be an attractive route to pursue (Ref. Reference Jackson and Pyeritz8). Accordingly, large-scale clinical studies are being launched in Europe and elsewhere.

Can NGS be simplified?

The above results have indicated that the use of complex cutting-edge genomic tools such as NGS can finally offer the long-sought dream of noninvasive detection of fetal aneuploidy (Refs Reference Hahn, Jackson and Zimmermann1, Reference Lo and Chiu56). However, this comes at a very high cost and unacceptably long analysis. A possible strategy to overcome these disadvantages is the targeting of only those chromosomes or regions of interest such as those on chromosome 21 for the detection of DS cases. Although several different strategies exist that permit some form of target enrichment prior to the subsequent sequencing step, they have to date been limited to examination of intact genomic DNA samples, and not fragmented DNA species such as those found in cf-DNA (Ref. Reference Liao57). Furthermore, these procedures, such as on-array capture, require rather large concentrations of input template DNA (up to 7.5 µg per sample). Hence, an approach that permitted targeted sequencing of the small quantities of fragmented DNA in maternal plasma had to be sought.

Very recently, a solution hybrid selection method using ultralong oligonucleotides, commercially marketed by Agilent, USA, has been used for targeted enrichment (Ref. Reference Liao57) (Fig. 3). A capture library specific for the X chromosome was hybridised with 500 ng of an amplified plasma DNA library, and the selected capture targets were pulled down using a combination of biotinylated oligonucleotide probes and streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. The enriched target DNA was then subjected to a further 12 rounds of PCR with specially tagged primers necessary for the subsequent sequence analysis. In the examination of 12 maternal plasma samples, this targeted capture procedure led to a mean enrichment of 213-fold. This enrichment was also reflected in the increased ability to detect fetal-specific loci on the X chromosome, which changed from 3.5% in the un-enriched samples to 95.9% in the samples subjected to a targeted enrichment step.

Figure 3. Schematic representation of a targeted sequencing approach using the SureSelectTM Target Enrichment System. In this procedure the cell-free DNA fragments are isolated and a library is generated as per the standard next-generation sequencing protocol. Prior to sequencing, however, this library is hybridised to the SureSelectTM Oligo Capture Library, which is manufactured in such a manner that it will recognise a specific chromosome, such as chromosome 21. These oligo sequences contain magnetic particles to permit their retrieval in a magnetic field. Hence, following hybridisation (65°C, 24 h), captured sequences are selected by magnetic selection, and unselected sequences are washed away. The bound fragments are then purified and prepared for sequencing and examined as described for Figure 2. This procedure was recently shown to permit a 213-fold enrichment of the targeted X chromosome (Ref. Reference Liao57).

A concern with any enrichment approach is that it might lead to bias, by preferential enhancement of select sequences, including the preferential accumulation of maternal cf-DNA sequences over fetal ones. However, in this study the proportion of fetal to maternal sequences was similar in un-enriched loci (~16–30% from first to third trimester) and in enriched X-chromosome regions (~15–32%) (Ref. Reference Liao57). These results are encouraging, because they could facilitate targeted enrichment of more crucial fetal loci, such as those on chromosome 21, thereby paving the way for a less complex noninvasive test for DS.

How much information is available from NGS?

The first series of experiments with NGS focused on select chromosomes and compared the number of reads obtained for these to those obtained for the entire genomic complement. Because close to 65 000 individual loci are counted on chromosome 21 alone, it was open to debate whether this approach would be sufficiently sensitive to detect more subtle chromosomal aberrations such as the Robertsonian translocation between chromosomes 21 and 15 (or 14), which has a role in 2–3% of cases with DS (Ref. Reference Hahn, Jackson and Zimmermann1). As the Down Syndrome Critical Region associated with this translocation is a lot smaller than the entire chromosome 21 commonly involved in DS, it was unclear whether the NGS approach would be able to detect this alteration (Ref. Reference Hahn, Jackson and Zimmermann1).

However, this view has been altered by a new landmark publication, in which the entire cf-DNA present in a maternal plasma sample was sequenced (Ref. Reference Lo24). The data indicated that the entire fetal genome complement is present in cf-DNA in maternal plasma, and that this can be mined to show minute details such as mutations involved in β-thalassaemia; surprisingly, the study correctly discerned that the fetus had inherited the paternal codon 41/42 mutation, involving a CTTT deletion, but not the maternal −28A→G mutation. Although this analysis was very complex, involving almost 4 billion reads and 900 000 SNPs, it is a striking indicator of what might lie ahead – namely, the ability to obtain a full fetal karyotype down to miniscule single-nucleotide detail from a single maternal blood sample (Ref. Reference Lo24).

The question of intellectual property and how to optimise procedures

An important concern that needs to be addressed is how intellectual property and commercialisation will affect future research and applications (Ref. Reference Szczepura, Osipenko and Freeman58). For the best possible service to reach the patient, clarity is essential; otherwise, conflicting reports and views might prevent superior products from being developed. In the case of fetal cf-DNA, such an issue was raised by the commercialisation of a noninvasive test for fetal RhD determination in the EU, and subsequently in the USA (Ref. Reference Szczepura, Osipenko and Freeman58). Although it was clear to leading researchers in the field that the tests initially marketed might be flawed or were not state of the art, it was felt that it would be a weary process to convince the commercial parties involved to change their standard of practice and to adopt more modern effective approaches. This issue was further highlighted by the near-simultaneous reports concerning the application of digital PCR or NGS, leading to conflicting reports in the lay media as to who the main patent claimants were (Refs Reference Hahn, Jackson and Zimmermann1, Reference Hahn59). It is currently also unclear what business model or strategies should be used in translating this research from the bench to the clinic. Hence, it might be worthwhile to echo previous concerns that such uncertainty might hinder or restrict further research in the field (Ref. Reference Daniels, Finning and Martin60).

Are fetal cells in maternal blood still worth pursuing?

Despite the enormous strides that have been made with the determination of fetal aneuploidies through the use of cf-DNA, the latest reports have indicated that these will be very labour intensive, and require extremely high-tech devices and bioinformatic services. Hence it is unclear how quickly these developments will be translatable into the clinic.

For this reason there has been a resurgent interest in the isolation of fetal cells from maternal blood. This have been fostered by the development of (1) sophisticated high-throughput automated scanning devices, which permit the rapid identification of putative target fetal cells among a large pool of maternal cells (Refs Reference Ntouroupi61, Reference Seppo62), and (2) efficient microfluidic systems and electronic micromanipulation systems, which permit the effective retrieval of individual trafficking fetal cells (Refs Reference Hahn59, Reference Lee63, Reference Huang64).

Even though this process will most likely also be laborious, it has several advantages over cf-DNA analysis, in that fetal cells offer a pure source of fetal genomic material. Furthermore, widely standardised procedures commonly used in many diagnostic laboratories, such as FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridisation), can be applied for the very rapid detection of chromosomal anomalies (Ref. Reference Evans65). In addition, use can now be made of a wide body of experience in the analysis of single cells, a routine practice in many in vitro fertilisation clinics offering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) (Ref. Reference Wells66).

A possible further advantage is that the intellectual property situation in this area is not as complex as that of cf-DNA, in that many of the original patents are close to expiry, and no commercial entity holds a wide portfolio of key elements. As such, it will be of interest to monitor progress in this sphere of research, because it might yet have a few surprises in store.

The challenge of proteomics

The development of the first-trimester DS screening test using a combination of ultrasound measurement of nuchal translucency, serum analyte analysis and maternal age has led to a dramatic increase in the ability to detect pregnancies at-risk of bearing an aneuploid fetus (85% sensitivity) when compared with the previous generation of second-trimester screening tests (65% sensitivity), which relied solely on serum analyte analysis in combination with maternal age (Ref. Reference Avgidou67). This facet is reflected in the report on the English and Welsh National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register analysis, which indicated that the vast majority of DS cases were detected by current screening practice (Ref. Reference Morris and Alberman5).

The downside of this startling development is that the first-trimester screen is still hampered by a rather high false-positive rate of 5–8% (Refs Reference Falcon68, Reference Cowans69). This implies that a large number of healthy pregnancies are being subjected to unnecessary invasive procedures – a healthcare risk for mother and unborn child, as well as a considerable financial burden for healthcare services. Furthermore, almost 15% of cases remain undetected and, because these occur in the group of pregnant women not judged to be at a higher risk (<35 years old), could result in undesired live births.

Therefore, increasing the efficiency of this test has been proposed, perhaps by the addition of further biochemical analytes, such as members of the activin family (Refs Reference Spencer70, Reference Spencer71). The inclusion of further highly specific blood-based analytes might be possible as a result of the development of quantitative proteomic technologies as part of the Human Proteome Association, especially the affiliated plasma proteome project (Ref. Reference Schmidt and Aebersold72). The placenta in DS cases exhibits structural alterations, which are most likely the result of alterations in protein expression, and so it is possible that these changes will be reflected in the maternal plasma proteome (Ref. Reference Choolani73). In this regard, the use of quantitative isobaric labelling has been shown to permit the detection of significant alterations in the levels of several placenta-derived peptides in DS cases when compared with controls (Ref. Reference Kolla74). Analogous observations have been made by other research groups using a variety of different proteomic approaches (Refs Reference Kolialexi75, Reference Tsangaris76, Reference Lopez77, Reference Nagalla78). It now remains to explore how useful these potential biomarkers will be in increasing the detection rate of the current first-trimester screen.

Summary and conclusion

Tremendous strides have been made with the analysis of fetal cf-DNA in maternal blood, in that we now stand on the threshold of a new generation of noninvasive diagnostic tools, which might even permit a detailed analysis of the entire fetal genome or a full karyotype. However, it remains to be seen how rapidly these can be translated into the clinic, in a manner that is cost effective and accessible to all. In this context it will be interesting to see which system, namely NGS, digital PCR or enrichment of methylated fetal cf-DNA fragments, passes the final hurdle to enter clinical service. Although the isolation and analysis of trafficking fetal cells might remain a peripheral test, it could be useful in those centres already offering FISH or PGD services. Should multiparameter mass spectroscopy and quantitative proteomics finally come of age, it might yield a set of biomarkers with unparalleled specificity, not only for DS screening but also for other pregnancy-related disorders such as preeclampsia.

Acknowledgements and funding

This report was funded by the clinical research fund of the University Women's Hospital Basel. The authors thank the referees for their critical and insightful comments.

References

References

1Hahn, S., Jackson, L.G. and Zimmermann, B.G. (2010) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: post-genomic developments. Genome Medicine 2, 50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Bianchi, D.W. (2010) From Michael to microarrays: 30 years of studying fetal cells and nucleic acids in maternal blood. Prenatal Diagnosis 30, 622-623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Ferguson-Smith, M.A. and Bianchi, D.W. (2010) Prenatal diagnosis: past, present, and future. Prenatal Diagnosis 30, 601-604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Lo, Y.M. (2010) Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis in 2020. Prenatal Diagnosis 30, 702-703Google ScholarPubMed
5Morris, J.K. and Alberman, E. (2009) Trends in Down's syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register. British Medical Journal 339, b3794CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Philip, J. et al. (2004) Late first-trimester invasive prenatal diagnosis: results of an international randomized trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103, 1164-1173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Chiu, R.W. et al. (2011) Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study. British Medical Journal 342, c7401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Jackson, L. and Pyeritz, R.E. (2011) Molecular technologies open new clinical genetic vistas. Science Translational Medicine 3, 65–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Lo, Y.M. et al. (1997) Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 350, 485-487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10van der Schoot, C.E., Hahn, S. and Chitty, L.S. (2008) Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and determination of fetal Rh status. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 13, 63-68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Chitty, L.S. et al. (2008) SAFE–the special non-invasive advances in fetal and neonatal evaluation network: aims and achievements. Prenatal Diagnosis 28, 83-88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Finning, K. et al. (2008) Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study. British Medical Journal 336, 816-818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Gautier, E. et al. (2005) Fetal RhD genotyping by maternal serum analysis: a two-year experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192, 666-669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Maddocks, D.G. et al. (2009) The SAFE project: towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Biochemical Society Transactions 37, 460-465Google Scholar
15Lo, Y.M. (2009) Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by maternal plasma nucleic acid analysis: a review of the current state of the art. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 116, 152-157Google Scholar
16Krentz, S.E. and Pilskaln, S.M. (1988) Product life cycle: still a valid framework for business planning. Top Health Care Finance 15, 40-48Google Scholar
17Lo, Y.M. et al. (1998) Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. American Journal of Human Genetics 62, 768-775CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Zimmermann, B. et al. (2005) Optimized real-time quantitative PCR measurement of male fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Clinical Chemistry 51, 1598-1604Google Scholar
19Sikora, A. et al. (2010) Detection of increased amounts of cell-free fetal DNA with short PCR amplicons. Clinical Chemistry 56, 136-138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Chan, K.C. et al. (2004) Size distributions of maternal and fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Clinical Chemistry 50, 88-92Google Scholar
21Li, Y. et al. (2004) Size separation of circulatory DNA in maternal plasma permits ready detection of fetal DNA polymorphisms. Clinical Chemistry 50, 1002-1011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Hahn, S. and Zimmermann, B.G. (2010) Cell-free DNA in maternal plasma: has the size-distribution puzzle been solved? Clinical Chemistry 56, 1210-1211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Fan, H.C. et al. (2010) Analysis of the size distributions of fetal and maternal cell-free DNA by paired-end sequencing. Clinical Chemistry 56, 1279-1286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lo, Y.M. et al. (2010) Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Science Translational Medicine 2, 61ra91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Li, Y. et al. (2005) Detection of paternally inherited fetal point mutations for beta-thalassemia using size-fractionated cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. Journal of the American Medical Association 293, 843-849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Li, Y. et al. (2004) Improved prenatal detection of a fetal point mutation for achondroplasia by the use of size-fractionated circulatory DNA in maternal plasma – case report. Prenatal Diagnosis 24, 896-898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Li, Y. et al. (2007) Non-invasive prenatal detection of achondroplasia in size-fractionated cell-free DNA by MALDI-TOF MS assay. Prenatal Diagnosis 27, 11-17Google Scholar
28Li, Y. et al. (2006) Genotyping fetal paternally inherited SNPs by MALDI-TOF MS using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma: influence of size fractionation. Electrophoresis 27, 3889-3896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Flori, E. et al. (2004) Circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal serum appears to originate from cyto- and syncytio-trophoblastic cells. Case report. Human Reproduction 19, 723-724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Alberry, M. et al. (2007) Free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in anembryonic pregnancies: confirmation that the origin is the trophoblast. Prenatal Diagnosis 27, 415-418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Chim, S.S. et al. (2008) Systematic search for placental DNA-methylation markers on chromosome 21: toward a maternal plasma-based epigenetic test for fetal trisomy 21. Clinical Chemistry 54, 500-511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Chim, S.S. et al. (2005) Detection of the placental epigenetic signature of the maspin gene in maternal plasma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 14753-14758Google Scholar
33Chiu, R.W. et al. (2007) Hypermethylation of RASSF1A in human and rhesus placentas. American Journal of Pathology 170, 941-950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Ehrich, M. et al. (2011) Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 204, 205.e1-205.e11Google Scholar
35Lo, Y.M. et al. (2007) Plasma placental RNA allelic ratio permits noninvasive prenatal chromosomal aneuploidy detection. Nature Medicine 13, 218-223Google Scholar
36Gandhi, S.J. et al. (2010) Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 18, 27-34Google Scholar
37Lionnet, T. and Singer, R.H. (2010) Transcription, one allele at a time. Genome Biology 11, 129Google Scholar
38Tong, Y.K. et al. (2006) Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal trisomy 18 by epigenetic allelic ratio analysis in maternal plasma: theoretical and empirical considerations. Clinical Chemistry 52, 2194-2202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Tong, Y.K. et al. (2010) Noninvasive prenatal detection of trisomy 21 by an epigenetic-genetic chromosome-dosage approach. Clinical Chemistry 56, 90-98Google Scholar
40Tsui, D.W. et al. (2010) Systematic identification of placental epigenetic signatures for the noninvasive prenatal detection of Edwards Syndrome. PLoS One 5, e15069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Papageorgiou, E.A. (2011) Fetal-specific DNA methylation ratio permits noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21. Nature Medicine, Mar 6; [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Papageorgiou, E.A. et al. (2009) Sites of differential DNA methylation between placenta and peripheral blood: molecular markers for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies. American Journal of Pathology 174, 1609-1618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Zimmermann, B. et al. (2007) Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction measurement of male fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Methods in Molecular Medicine 132, 43-49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Zimmermann, B. et al. (2006) Use of real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of fetal aneuploidies. Methods in Molecular Biology 336, 83-100Google Scholar
45Vogelstein, B. and Kinzler, K.W. (1999) Digital PCR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 9236-9241Google Scholar
46Zimmermann, B.G. et al. (2008) Digital PCR: a powerful new tool for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis? Prenatal Diagnosis 28, 1087-1093Google Scholar
47Fan, H.C. and Quake, S.R. (2007) Detection of aneuploidy with digital polymerase chain reaction. Analytical Chemistry 79, 7576-7579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Fan, H.C. et al. (2009) Microfluidic digital PCR enables rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200, 543, e541–547Google Scholar
49Lo, Y.M. et al. (2007) Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 13116-13121Google Scholar
50Ansorge, W.J. (2009) Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. New Biotechnology 25, 195-203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Jones, S. et al. (2008) Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 4283-4288Google Scholar
52Leary, R.J. et al. (2010) Development of personalized tumor biomarkers using massively parallel sequencing. Science Translational Medicine 2, 20ra14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Chiu, R.W. et al. (2008) Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 20458-20463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Chiu, R.W., Cantor, C.R. and Lo, Y.M. (2009) Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis by single molecule counting technologies. Trends in Genetics 25, 324-331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Fan, H.C. et al. (2008) Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 16266-16271Google Scholar
56Lo, Y.M. and Chiu, R.W. (2009) Next-generation sequencing of plasma/serum DNA: an emerging research and molecular diagnostic tool. Clinical Chemistry 55, 607-608Google Scholar
57Liao, G.J. et al. (2010) Targeted massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA permits efficient and unbiased detection of fetal alleles. Clinical Chemistry 57, 92-101Google Scholar
58Szczepura, A., Osipenko, L. and Freeman, K. (2011) A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 11, 5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Hahn, S. et al. (2009) Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies and Mendelian disorders: new innovative strategies. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 9, 613-621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Daniels, G., Finning, K. and Martin, P. (2010) Noninvasive fetal blood grouping: present and future. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 30, 431-442Google Scholar
61Ntouroupi, T.G. et al. (2008) Detection of circulating tumour cells in peripheral blood with an automated scanning fluorescence microscope. British Journal of Cancer 99, 789-795Google Scholar
62Seppo, A. et al. (2008) Detection of circulating fetal cells utilizing automated microscopy: potential for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies. Prenatal Diagnosis 28, 815-821Google Scholar
63Lee, D. et al. (2010) Separation of model mixtures of epsilon-globin positive fetal nucleated red blood cells and anucleate erythrocytes using a microfluidic device. Journal of Chromatography A 1217, 1862-1866CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64Huang, R. et al. (2008) A microfluidics approach for the isolation of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) from the peripheral blood of pregnant women. Prenatal Diagnosis 28, 892-899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Evans, M.I. et al. (2006) Automated microscopy of amniotic fluid cells: detection of FISH signals using the FastFISH imaging system. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 21, 523-527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Wells, D. (2010) Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 21, 274-277Google Scholar
67Avgidou, K. et al. (2005) Prospective first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 30,564 pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192, 1761-1767Google Scholar
68Falcon, O. et al. (2006) Screening for trisomy 21 by fetal tricuspid regurgitation, nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 27, 151-155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69Cowans, N.J. et al. (2009) The impact of fetal gender on first trimester nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A MoM in normal and trisomy 21 pregnancies. Prenatal Diagnosis 29, 578-581Google Scholar
70Spencer, K. et al. (2001) Maternal serum levels of dimeric inhibin A in pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 in the first trimester. Prenatal Diagnosis 21, 441-444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71Spencer, K. et al. (2001) Maternal serum levels of total activin-A in first-trimester trisomy 21 pregnancies. Prenatal Diagnosis 21, 270-273Google Scholar
72Schmidt, A. and Aebersold, R. (2006) High-accuracy proteome maps of human body fluids. Genome Biology 7, 242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73Choolani, M. et al. (2009) Proteomic technologies for prenatal diagnostics: advances and challenges ahead. Expert Review of Proteomics 6, 87-101Google Scholar
74Kolla, V. et al. (2010) Quantitative proteomics analysis of maternal plasma in Down syndrome pregnancies using isobaric tagging reagent (iTRAQ). Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2010, 952047Google Scholar
75Kolialexi, A. et al. (2008) Application of proteomics for the identification of differentially expressed protein markers for Down syndrome in maternal plasma. Prenatal Diagnosis 28, 691-698Google Scholar
76Tsangaris, G.T. et al. (2006) Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid in pregnancies with Down syndrome. Proteomics 6, 4410-4419Google Scholar
77Lopez, M.F. et al. (2010) Mass spectrometric discovery and selective reaction monitoring (SRM) of putative protein biomarker candidates in first trimester trisomy 21 maternal serum. Journal of Proteome Research 10, 133-142Google Scholar
78Nagalla, S.R. et al. (2007) Proteomic analysis of maternal serum in down syndrome: identification of novel protein biomarkers. Journal of Proteome Research 6, 1245-1257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Further reading, resources and contacts

A study funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research to assist with the transfer of noninvasive prenatal diagnostic techniques into the clinic is described at:

Chiu, R.W., Cantor, C.R. and Lo, Y.M. (2009) Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis by single molecule counting technologies. Trends in Genetics 7, 324-331Google Scholar
Chitty, L.S. and Lau, T.K. (2011) First trimester screening – new directions for antenatal care. Prenatal Diagnosis 31, 1-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson-Smith, M.A. and Bianchi, D.W. (2010) Prenatal diagnosis: past, present, future. Prenatal Diagnosis 30, 601-604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, R.W., Cantor, C.R. and Lo, Y.M. (2009) Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis by single molecule counting technologies. Trends in Genetics 7, 324-331Google Scholar
Chitty, L.S. and Lau, T.K. (2011) First trimester screening – new directions for antenatal care. Prenatal Diagnosis 31, 1-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson-Smith, M.A. and Bianchi, D.W. (2010) Prenatal diagnosis: past, present, future. Prenatal Diagnosis 30, 601-604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Detection of fetal aneuploidy using digital PCR. In this procedure, fluorescent PCR specific for sequences on chromosomes 12 and 21 is carried out in individual microreaction chambers. The amount of input template is titrated in such a fashion that each microreaction vessel contains >1 copy. After the plateau phase has been reached (approximately 40 cycles), the PCR reaction is terminated, and the number of positive reactions for each locus is counted. In euploid cases the ratio of blue (chromosome 12) to red (chromosome 21) signals should be 1, whereas in cases with Down syndrome the ratio of blue (chromosome 12) to red (chromosome 21) signals should be 1.5 (illustrated in more detail in Ref. 46). This method has to date not been successfully used for the detection of fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Detection of fetal aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing. In this procedure the cell-free DNA fragments in maternal plasma are isolated, and a library with special sequence tags is then made. These tags permit subsequent multiplex analysis. The library is examined by next-generation sequencing, which determines the sequence of each and every fragment. By bioinformatic analysis these sequences are ascribed to chromosomal locations. Following this, the number of sequence reads for each chromosome is counted. For chromosome 21 this is typically of the order of several thousand reads, which can then be compared with several million reads spread across the genome. If the fetus is affected by Down syndrome, then slightly more reads will be recorded for chromosome 21 compared with those from a euploid fetus. By comparing these data with a bank of reference samples, and by the use of predetermined cut-off values (Z score), the ploidy of the sample being examined can be determined (described in more detail in Refs 53, 54).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Schematic representation of a targeted sequencing approach using the SureSelectTM Target Enrichment System. In this procedure the cell-free DNA fragments are isolated and a library is generated as per the standard next-generation sequencing protocol. Prior to sequencing, however, this library is hybridised to the SureSelectTM Oligo Capture Library, which is manufactured in such a manner that it will recognise a specific chromosome, such as chromosome 21. These oligo sequences contain magnetic particles to permit their retrieval in a magnetic field. Hence, following hybridisation (65°C, 24 h), captured sequences are selected by magnetic selection, and unselected sequences are washed away. The bound fragments are then purified and prepared for sequencing and examined as described for Figure 2. This procedure was recently shown to permit a 213-fold enrichment of the targeted X chromosome (Ref. 57).