Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T02:44:54.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barwick by David Marr. (George Allen & Unwin Australia, 1980), pp. i-x, 1-330. Cloth, recommended retail price $16.95 (ISBN: 0 86861 058 5).

Review products

Barwick by David Marr. (George Allen & Unwin Australia, 1980), pp. i-x, 1-330. Cloth, recommended retail price $16.95 (ISBN: 0 86861 058 5).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

Michael Sexton
Michael Sexton*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 460 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Address of Sir Owen Dixon on taking the oath of office as Chief Justice (1952) 85 C.L.R. xi, xiv.

2 Western Australia v. The Commonwealth (1975) 134 C.L.R. 201.

3 See e.g. Melbourne Corporation v. The Commonwealth (1947) 74 C.L.R. 31,80-82.

4 Uebergang v. Australian Wheat Board (1980) 32 A.L.R. 1. This case was undertaken by the plaintiff as a challenge to the decision in Clark King Co. Pty Ltd v. Australian Wheat Board (1978) 52 A.L.J.R. 670 in which the Court by a majority of 3/2 upheld the validity of the wheat stabilisation scheme. Uebergang went off on procedural questions and so the substantive issue decided in Clark King was not considered.

5 (1980) 32 A.L.R. 1, 9.

6 Id. 7.

7 See e.g. Boyd v. Carah Coaches Pty Ltd (1980) 54 A.L.J.R. 33.

8 See e.g. S.O.S. (Mowbray) Pty Ltd v. Mead (1972) 124 C.L.R. 529.

9 See e.g. R. v. Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; ex parte Melbourne and Metropolitan Tramways Board (1966) 115 C.L.R. 443.

10 See e.g. Pitfield v. Franki (1970) 123 C.L.R. 448. The requirement that employees seeking registration as an organization under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 be “in or in connexion with any industry” is found in s.132(1)(b) of the Act. The term “industry” is defined ins. 4(1) of the Act.

11 (1975) 134 C.L.R. 201. This issue was reheard in Queensland v. The Commonwealth (1977) 139 C.L.R. 585.

12 Attorney-General of the State of Western Australia (At the relation of Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Proprietary Limited) v. Australian National Airlines Commission (1976) 138 C.L.R. 492.

13 Victoria v. The Commonwealth (1915) 134 C.L.R. 338.

14 Id. 360-361.

15 R. v. Trade Practices Tribunal; ex parte St George County Council (1974) 130 C.L.R. 533; In re Adamson; ex parte Western Australian National Football League (Incorporated) and West Perth Football Club (Incorporated) (1979) 53 A.L.J.R. 273.

16 In re Adamson; ex parte Western Australian National Football League (Incorporated) and West Perth Football Club (Incorporated) (1979) 53 A.L.J.R. 273.

17 See e.g. Dickenson's Arcade Pty Ltd v. Tasmania (1974) 130 C.L.R. 177, 185.