Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T02:25:03.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Commonwealth of Australia v. Rhind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

B. G. Donald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Notes
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1968 , pp. 130 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (1966) 40 A.L.J.R. 407. High Court of Australia; Barwick C.J., McTiernan, Taylor, Menzies and Owen JJ. (McTiernan J. agreed with the reasons of Barwick C.J.).

2 Brereton J. sitting without a jury under section 3 of the Supreme Court Procedure Act 1900-1965 (N.S.W.).

3 (1963) 63 S.R. (N.S.W.) 1.

4 Sugerman and Manning JJ.

5 Richardson J.

6 Ejectment was made a statutory remedy by the Common Law Procedure Act of 1853 (N.S.W.).

7 Note that this expresses the submission neutrally. As will be shown later it is not really clear just what constitutional question arose.

8 This would be so by the joint operation of sections 41 and 32 of the Judiciary Act 1903-1965 (Cth).

9 (1966) 40 A.L.J.R. 407, 408F.

10 Ibid. 409F.

11 Bank of New South Wales and Others v. The Commonwealth and Others (1948) 76 C.L.R. 1.

12 Ibid. per Latham C.J., Rich, McTiernan, Starke and Williams IJ.

13 Barwick C.J. went further and stated that even if it was the “ appeal ”, sincethis was a rehearing then section 32 and not section 37 of the Judiciary Act 1903-1965(Cth) applied.

14 (1966) 40 A.L.J.R. 407, 411D.

15 (1923) 32 C.L.R. 413.

16 Section 39 (2.) confers federal jurisdiction on State courts “ within the limits of their several jurisdictions ”.

17 (1966) 40 A.L.J.R. 407, 414B.

18 Ibid. 412A.

19 Ibid. 415C per Menzies J.

20 Ibid. 412D per Barwick C.J.

21 Ibid. 412E.

22 North Sydney Municipal Council v. The Housing Commission of New South Wales (1948) 48 S.R. (N.S.W.) 281; The Victorian Railways Commissioners v. Herbert [1949] V.L.R. 211.

23 (1966) 40 A.L.J.R. 407, 412F (italics added).

24 Section 75 (iii.) of the Constitution and section 39 of the Judiciary Act 1903-1965 (Cth).

25 (1966) 40 A.L.J.R. 407, 409D.

26 Ibid. 409C.

27 Ibid. 414.

28 Ibid. 414D.

29 (1953) 89 C.L.R. 229, 259.