No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2025
In this article Professor Heuston reminisces on the distinctive functions of the judge and of the teacher of law. Each has a contribution to make and each is dependent on the other to a greater extent than either may be prepared to admit.
1 “How to Become a Jurist” (1962) Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 129, 130-131.
2 Gower, , “English Legal Training” (1950) 13 Modern Law Review 137, 198CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Wells, The New Machiavelli (Atlantic ed. 1925) 396.
4 Dixon, Jesting Pilate (1965) 2.
5 Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law of England, Vol. 3, 330.
6 [1919] 2 K.B. 243.
7 Churchill, Great Contemporaries (1937) 140-141.
8 Weeramantry, The Law in Crisis (1975) X.
9 Hardwick Game Farm v. Suffolk Agricultural Association [1966] 1 W.L.R.287, 320.
10 Goldsmith v. Sperrings Ltd [1977] 1 W.L.R. 478, 508.
11 O'Brien, , To Katanga and Back (1962) 75Google Scholar.
12 McNair, Collected Papers 142.
13 Robertshaw, , “Characteristics of the Judicial Group and Their Relation to Decision-making” (1973) 47 A.L.J. 572Google Scholar.
14 [1936] A.C. 85.
15 Blackburn, , “Plain Words on the Judicial Process” (1974) 48 A.L.J. 229, 231Google Scholar.
16 Ray v. Sempers [1974] A.C. 370.
17 Edwards v. Ddin [1976] 1 W.L.R. 942.
18 [1970] 1 Q.B. 447.
19 [1975] A.C. 396.