Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T21:58:44.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

D Volker*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterans’ Affairs, Canberra

Extract

The availability of reasons for decisions is an important part of recent developments in Commonwealth administration. As Mrs Burnett’s scholarly analysis shows, these developments have not been without their uncertainties. I would like to pursue a few of the issues raised in her paper and mention some issues associated with providing reasons for decisions in the Repatriation area.

There is much to be said for a person affected by a decision having a right to obtain full written reasons for the decision. This enables the person affected to find out why the particular decision has been made. It may also provide a possible basis for challenge to the decision. As Mrs Burnett notes, the need to give reasons has also been described as encouraging consistency and better quality in decision-making.

Type
Article Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Whitmore, H, “Commentary” (1981) 12 FLR 117, 118Google Scholar.

2 (1983) 5 ALD 121.

3 Supra n 2, 128.

4 Repatriation Legislation Amendment Act 1982 (Cth) s 6.