Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T22:50:56.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Defence of Republicanism: A Reply to George Williams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

Andrew Fraser*
Affiliation:
School of Law, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW

Extract

George Williams poses a very topical question: is a republican tradition for Australia either possible or desirable? Simply by recognising republicanism as a tradition deeply rooted in the history of Western political thought, Williams helps to take us beyond the current officially sponsored nativist campaign to rid us of our “foreign” Queen. Republicanism is a complex phenomenon that first became manifest in the world of classical antiquity. The strength of Williams's article lies in the impulse to break free from the banal parochialism of the republic promoted by the Australian Republican Movement and a compliant media eager to service the perceived legitimation needs of the national government.

In the American constitutional tradition Williams finds a rich store of ideas about the role of an active citizenry in the creation and preservation of a free republican society. The idea of the republic in America did not begin or end with the removal of a “foreign” monarch. Republicanism inspired the transformation of American society after the overthrow of the British monarchy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 George, Williams, “A Republican Tradition for Australia?” (1995) 23 FL Rev 133.Google Scholar

2 Gordon S, Wood, The Radicalism of the American Revolution (1993)Google Scholar

3 Pauline, Maier, From Resistance to Revolution; Colonial Radicals and the Development of Resistance to Britain, 1765-1776 (1972) at 272.Google Scholar

4 G Williams, above n 1 at 143.

5 Ibid at 148.

6 Ibid at 134.

7 Ibid at 143 and 134.

8 On republicanism as a political language, see J G A Pocock, Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History (1989).

9 Thomas, Paine, Common Sense and the Crisis (1960)Google Scholar; Eric, Foner, Tom Paine and Revolutionary America (1976).Google Scholar

11 Eugene, Forsey, Freedom and Order: Collected Essays (1974) at 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Pocock, J G A1776: The Revolution Against Parliament” in JG A Pocock (ed), Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776 (1980) 265 at 286.Google Scholar

13 G Williams, above n 1 at 134-135.

14 Republic Advisory Committee, An Australian Republic: The Options - The Report (The Report of the Republic Advisory Committee, 1993) Vol 1 at 41. Cited in G Williams, above n 1 at 140.

15 Andrew, Fraser, The Spirit of the Laws: Republicanism and the Unfinished Project of Modernity (1990) at 97 and 111-116.Google Scholar

16 G Williams, above n 1 at 140.

17 Braithwaite, J Pettit, P, Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice (1990).Google Scholar

18 Pettit, P, “Republican Themes” (1992) 6(2) Legislative Studies 29.Google Scholar

19 G Williams, above n 1 at 141.

20 Cf Tom, Nairn, The Enchanted Glass: Britain and Its Monarchy (1988).Google Scholar

21 Michael, Walzer, Regicide and Revolution: Speeches at the Trial of Louis XVI (1974) at 88.Google Scholar

22 Hannah, Arendt, The Human Condition (1958) at 221.Google Scholar

23 Lord, Hailsham, The Dimbleby Lecture 1977, expanded in The Dilemma of Democracy (1978).Google Scholar

24 Frarnçois, Furet, Interpreting the French Revolution (1980) at 34-39.Google Scholar

25 Ibid at 78.

26 Article, VI, Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, August 26, 1789Google Scholar

27 William H, Sewell, Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848 (1980) at 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 H Arendt, above n 22 at 221.

29 M Walzer, above n 21 at 23.

30 Aristotle, , The Politics, tr TA Sinclair (1957) at 92.Google Scholar

31 According to John Dunn, the “organizational reality of any modem state is radically incompatible with its being a system of popular rule”: see The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (1990) at 30. Cf Andrew Fraser, “Postmodern Populism and the Australian State” (1992) Thesis Eleven 31 at 143-53.

32 A good Australian example of the doctrinal strategy can be found in M J Detmold, The Australian Commonwealth: A Fundamental Analysis of Its Constitution (1985).

33 Donald, Meyer, The Positive Thinkers: A Study of the American Quest for Health, Wealth and Personal Power from Mary Baker Eddy to Norman Vincent Peale (1966) at 177.Google Scholar

34 Ibid.

35 Ibid at 178. See also Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle (1970).

36 Otto von, Gierke, Community in Historical Perspective (1990). Cf James, Willard Hurst, The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780-1970 (1970).Google Scholar

37 0 von Gierke, above n 36 at 203-204.

38 Christopher, Lasch, The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy (1995).Google Scholar

39 H Arendt, above n 22 at 40.

40 Cf Hannah, Arendt, On Revolution (1977) at 253.Google Scholar

41 G Williams, above n 1 at 142.

42 Montesquieu, , The Spirit of the Laws (1989) at 25Google Scholar

43 Cf David, Gross, “Left MelancholyTelos 65 (Fall 1985) 112.Google Scholar

44 Andrew Fraser, “The Partial Republic: A Review of The Partial Constitution” (1995) 2 Review of Constitutional Studies 396. On republicanism as an expression of oppositional politics, see Caroline Robbins, The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthmen (1959); Bernard Bailyn, The Ideology of the American Revolution (1967); J GA Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republic Tradition (1975); David Burchell, “The Virtuous Citizen and the Commercial Spirit: The Unhappy Prehistory of Citizenship and Modernity” in G Hage and L Johnson (eds), Communal/Plural: Republicanism Citizenship, Community (1995) 17.

45 Cf A Fraser, above n 15 at 97 and 111-116. See also, Carl Schmitt, Political Theory: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (1985).

46 Mark, Nadel, “The Hidden Dimensions of Public Policy: Private Governments and the Policy-making Process” (1975) 37 Journal of Politics 2.Google Scholar

47 Arthur Selwyn, Miller, The Modern Corporate State: Private Governments and the American Constitution (1976) at 200-209Google Scholar.

48 Ibid at 243-251.

49 Cf Andrew Fraser, “Strong Republicanism and a Citizens' Constitution” in W Hudson and D Carter (eds), The Republicanism Debate (1993) 36; Andrew Fraser, “Beyond the Charter Debate: Republicanism, Rights and Civic Virtue in the Civil Constitution of Canadian Society” (1993) 1 Review of Constitutional Studies 27.

50 G Williams, above n 1 at 142.

51 (1992) 177 CLR 106.

52 G Williams, above n 1 at 146-72.

53 (1920) 28 CLR 129.

54 Ibid at 151-152.

55 Andrew Fraser, “False Hopes: Implied Rights and Popular Sovereignty in the Australian Constitution” (1994) 16 Sydney L Rev 213; cf George Williams, “Engineers is Dead, Long Live the Engineers!” (1995) 17 Sydney L Rev 62.

56 Krieger, L, An Essay on the Theory of Enlightened Despotism (1975) at 39.Google Scholar

57 G Williams, above n 1 at 146.

58 Ibid at 143.

59 Margaret Canavan, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought (1994) at 87.

60 G Williams, above n 1 at 146.

61 Civic Experts Group, Whereas the People: Civic and Citizenship Education (Report of the Civic Experts Group, 1994), cited in G Williams, above n 1 at 148.