Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T21:32:42.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pilkington v. Frank Hammond Pty Ltd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

John Griffiths
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Notes
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 402 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

(1974) 2 A.LR. 563; (1974) 48 A.L.J.R. 61. High Court of Australia; Barwick C.J., McTiernan, Menzies, Gibbs, Stephen, Mason and Jacobs JJ.

References

2 (1974) 2 A.LR. 563, 569.

3 Id. 621.

4 Id. 619.

5 Id. 598.

6 Id. 594. McTiernan J. did not discuss the issue, while Stephen J. held that it was unnecessary for him to decide either way: id. 610.

7 Id. 590.

8 Id. 598.

9 Id. 610.

10 Id. 567.

11 Id. 619.

12 (1955) 93 C.L.R. 113.

13 Id. 124 per Dixon C.J., McTiernan, Williams, Webb and Taylor JJ.

14 (1957) 96 C.L.R. 177.

15 Hughes v. Tasmania (1955) 93 C.L.R. 113 was distinguished on this point:(1957) 96 C.L.R. 177, 182-183.

16 (1957) 96 C.L.R. 177, 184.

17 (1961) 107 C.L.R. 157.

18 (1961) 107 C.L.R. 157, 162 per Dixon C.J., 165 per Taylor J.

19 (1962-1963) 109 C.L.R. 225.

20 Id.238.

21 Howard, Australian Federal Constitutional Law (2nd ed. 1972) 354Google Scholar.

22 (1974) 2 A.L.R. 563, 573.

23 Ibid.

24 Id. 574.

25 Id. 578.

26 Id. 585.

27 Id. 584.

28 28 Jd. 583.

29 Ibid. Mason J. rejected the distinctions on similar grounds: id. 617.

30 (1951) 84 C.L.R. 421.

31 Id. 433.

32 (1974) 2 A.LR. 563, 586.

33 Id. 604.

34 Ibid.

35 Id. 612.

36 Ibid.

37 Id. 617.

38 ..ld. 619.

39 Id. 617.

40 Id. 620.

41 Id. 623.

42 Jacobs J. did say that the individual should be able to establish an impact or interference with his trade as a prerequisite to his obtaining the protection ofs. 92: id. 622.

43 Id. 624.

44 1d. 607.

45 Id. 608.

46 (1965) 112 C.L.R. 353 !1,D.d see also Webb v. Stagg (1965) 112 C.L.R. 374

47 (1974) 2 A.L.R. 563, 610.

48 Ibid.

49 Ibid.

50 Id. 588. Cf. W. & A. McArthur Ltd v. Queensland (1920) 28 C.L.R. 530.

51 (1974) 2 A.L.R. 563, 590.

52 Id. 596.

53 Cf. Bell Bros Pty Ltd v. Rathbone (1962-1963) 109 C.L.R. 22S and Simms v. West (1961) 107 C.L.R. 1S7.

54 (1974) 2 A.L.R. S63, S91.

55 Barwick C.J., Gibbs and Mason JJ.

56 Cf. Coper, “The Impact of Section 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution upon Intrastate Segments of Interstate Transportation” (1974) 48 A.L.J. 563.Google Scholar