No CrossRef data available.
Supreme Court of Tasmania, Burbury, C.J. Not reported. References are to the Court transcript.
2 (1967) 10 F.L.R. 219, 221; the judgment of the Supreme Court was delivered by Winneke, C.l.
3 Transcript, p. 3.
4 Transcript, p. 3.
5 [1967] S.A.S.R. 408.
6 Ibid.
7 Transcript, pp. 5, 8.
8 [1963] 3 All E.R. 191.
9 (1961) 2 F.L.R. 280.
10 [1963] 3 All E.R. 191.
11 (1961) 2 F.L.R. 280.
12 [1963] P. 311, 317 per Willmer, L.J.
13 [1963] Ch. 381, 405 per Upjohn, L.J.
14 Transcript, p. 5.
15 (1963) 9 F.L.R. 384, 408-409.
16 (1967) 10 F.L.R. 219, 222.
17 Transcript, p. 5.
18 [1940] G.L.R. 165, 168 as approved by Myers, C.J. in Reid v. Reid [1941] N.Z.L.R. 952; M. v. M. [1941] N.Z.L.R. 851; Re Hylton [1928] N.Z.L.R. 145 and X. v. Y. (No.4) [1955] V.L.R. 105.
19 [1970] 1 All E.R. 309.
20 [1968] 3 All E.R. 408.
21 Despite the conclusions of the authors of a recent American article: Ellsworth, P. C. and Levy, R. J., “Legislative Reform of Child Custody Adjudication—An Effort to Rely on Social Science Data in Formulating Legal Policies” (1969) 4 Law & Society 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 201-215.
22 [1949] S.A.S.R. 275.
23 W. v. W. & C. [1968] 3 All E.R. 408, 409, per Sachs, L.J.
24 Transcript, p. 7.
25 Reeves v. Reeves (No.2) (1961) 2 F.L.R. 280, 281 per Barry, J.