Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T03:31:13.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thematic Issue Editorial Comment: Constitutional Struggles in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Dian AH Shah ,
Andrew J Harding  and
Jonathan N Liljeblad Open the ORCID record for Jonathan N Liljeblad [Opens in a new window]
Dian AH Shah
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Andrew J Harding
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Jonathan N Liljeblad*
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
*
The author may be contacted at: jonathan.lijeblad@anu.edu.au.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Issue (Part 1): Constitutional Struggles in Asia
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 50 , Issue 2: Special Issue (Part 1): Constitutional Struggles in Asia , June 2022 , pp. 131 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lee and Bertoa (n 1); Marston (n1).

2. Rosalind Dixon, ‘Toward a Realistic Comparative Constitutional Studies?’ (2016) 64(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 193.; Ran Hirschl, ‘The Comparative in Comparative Constitutional Law: A Response to Dixon and Tushnet’ (2016) 64(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 209; Mark Tushnet, ‘Saying and Doing in Comparative Constitutional Studies’ (2016) 64(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 201; Ran Hirschl, Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).

3. Hirschl (n 2) 152.

4. Dixon (n 2).

5. Tushnet (n 2).

6. See eg, Ran Hirschl, ‘The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide’ (2006) 75(2) Fordham Law Review 721; James Levine, Juries and Politics (Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1992); Lawrence Friedman, ’Law and Society Movement’ (1986) 38(3) Stanford Law Review 763.

7. Laura Beth Nielsen, License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech (Princeton University Press, 2004); David Engel, ‘Presidential Address: Making Connections: Law and Society Researchers and Their Subjects’ (1999) 33(1) Law and Society Review 3; Patricia Ewick and Susan Silbey, The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life (University of Chicago Press, 1998).

8. Herbert Kritzer and Susan Silbey (eds), In Litigation: Do the ‘Haves’ Still Come Out Ahead? (Stanford University Press, 2003); Marc Galanter, ‘Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change’ (1974) 9(1) Law and Society Review 95.

9. Christine Harrington and Daniel Ward, ‘Patterns of Appellate Litigation’ in Lee Epstein (ed), Contemplating Courts (Congressional Quarterly Press, 1995); Frank Munger, ‘Special Issue on Longitudinal Studies of Trial Courts’ (1990) 24(2) Law and Society Review 1.

10. Anna-Maria Marshall, Confronting Sexual Harassment: The Law and Politics of Everyday Life (Ashgate Publishing, 2005); Lynn Mather, Plea Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal Case Disposition (Lexington Press, 1979).

11. Mikael Madsen, ‘Sociological Approaches to Constitutional Law’ (iCourts Working Paper Series, No 212 Social Science Research Network, 13 November 2020); Paul Blokker and Christopher Thornhill (eds) Sociological Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2017).

12. See, eg, Colin Harvey, ‘On Law, Politics, and Contemporary Constitutionalism’ (2003) 26(4) Fordham International Law Journal 996.

13. See, eg, Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, ‘Domestic Explanations of International Relations’ (2012) 15 Annual Review of Political Science 1611; Boaventura de Sousa Santos, ‘The Heterogeneous State and Legal Pluralism in Mozambique’ (2006) 40(1) Law and Society Review 39; Uwe Kischel, ‘The State as a Non-Unitary Actor: The Role of the Judicial Branch in International Negotiations’ (2001) 39(3) Archiv des Völlkerrechts 268.

14. Angelo Golia, Jr and Gunther Teubner, ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Background, Theory, Debates’ (2021) 15(4) ICL Journal 357.

15. Hans Lindahl, ‘Societal Constitutionalism as Political Constitutionalism: Reconsidering the Relation Between Politics and Global Legal Orders’ (2011) 20(2) Social and Legal Studies 230.

16. See, eg, Susanne Baer, ‘The Rule of—and Not By Any—Law. On Constitutionalism’ (2018) 71(1) Current Legal Problems 335; Mark Tushnet, ‘Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ (2015) 100(2) Cornell Law Review 391.

17. See, eg, Stephen Gardbaum, ‘Revolutionary Constitutionalism’ (2017) 15(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 173; Gavin Anderson, ‘Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below’ (2013) 20(2) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 881; Harvey (n 12).

18. Gunther Teubner, ‘The Project of Constitutional Sociology: Irritating Nation State Constitutionalism’ (2012) 4(1) Transnational Legal Theory 46.

19. See, eg, Kevin Tan amd Ngoc Son Bui (eds), Constitutional Foundings in Southeast Asia (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019); Andrew Harding and Ngoc Son Bui, ‘Recent Work in Constitutional Studies: A Review Essay’ (2016) 11 Asian Journal of Comparative Law163; Jiunn-rong Weh and Wen-Chen Chang, Asia Courts in Context (Cambridge University Press, 2015); Wen-Chen Chang et al, Constitutionalism in Asia: Cases & Materials (Hart Publishing, 2015); Rosalind Dixon amd Tom Ginsburg (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law in Asia (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014); Susan Williams (ed), Social Difference and Constitutionalism in Pan-Asia (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

20. Albert H.Y. Chen, ‘Pathways of Western Liberal Constitutional Development in Asia: A Comparative Study of Five Major Nations’ (2010) 8(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 849; Qianfan Zhang, ‘A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? The Paths of Constitutional Development in China’ (2010) 8(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 950; Qianfan Zhang, ‘Of Comparative Constitutional Monocropping: A Rejoinder to Michael Dowdle’ (2010) 8(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 985; Michael Dowdle, ‘Of Comparative Constitutional Monocropping: A Reply to Qianfan Zhang’ (2010) 8(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 977.

21. Harding and Bui (n 19); Teemu Ruskola, Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law (Harvard University Press, 2013).

22. See, eg, Tan and Bui (n 19); Andrew Harding, ‘Constitutionalism and Development: A Mismatch or a Dream-Team?’ (2019) 12(3) Law and Development Review 647; Maartje de Visser and Ngoc Son Bui, ‘Glocalised Constitution-Making in the Twenty-First Century: Evidence from Asia’ (2019) 8(2) Global Constitutionalism 297; Dian Shah, The Politics of Religion and Constitutionalism in Asia: Constitutions, Religion, and Politics in Asia: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka (Cambridge University Press, 2017); Marco Bunte and Bjorn Dressel (eds), Politics and Constitutions in Southeast Asia (Routledge, 2016); Aurel Croissant, ‘Ways of Constitution-Making in Southeast Asia: Actors, Interests, Dynamics’ 2014 36(1) Contemporary Southeast Asia 23; Bjorn Dressel and Marco Bunte, ‘Constitutional Politics in Southeast Asia: From Contestation to Constitutionalism?’ (2014) 36(1) Contemporary Southeast Asia 1.

23. Bjorn and Bunte (n 22).

24. Hirschl (n 2).