Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:15:08.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The end of an illusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Joseph Vogl*
Affiliation:
Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany/Princeton University, USA
*
Corresponding author: Joseph Vogl, Institute forGerman Literature, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin,Germany. Email: vogljose@cms.hu-berlin.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mainstream economics must be conceived of as a sort of ‘dangerous’ knowledge – because its models (like the idea of efficient markets) offer no explanation for the regularity of crises and crashes in financial markets in the last decades; and because these models were also employed in the implementation and justification of these very markets. Just as the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 once shook modern theodicy to its foundations, so the financial tremors of the last twenty years threaten to undermine the scientific status of economic theory. What is at issue is nothing less than the validity, possibility, and tenability of a liberal or capitalist oikodicy, a theodicy of the economic universe. It is likely that we are dealing here with one of the greatest and most fatal of errors of modern economics.

Type
Forum: Money’s other worlds
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2015 The Author(s)

References

Braudel, F. (1973/1967) Capitalism and Material Life, 1400-1800, translated by Kochan, M.. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
DeLillo, D. (2003) Cosmopolis. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008/2004) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79, translated by Burchell, G.. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2011) Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York, NY: Melville House.Google Scholar
Hill, M. and Montag, W. (2015) The Other Adam Smith. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2015) The Emotional Logic of Capitalism: What Progressives Have Missed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1985/1710) Theodicy, translated by Huggard, E. M.. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. (1986) Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, A. (1816) Versuche einer neuen Theorie des Geldes mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Großbritannien. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Sayers, R. S. (1982/1957) Central Banking After Bagehot. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sombart, W. (1902) Der moderne Kapitalismus, Vol. I: Die Genesis des Kapitalismus. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Vogl, J. (2015a) The Specter of Capital, translated by Redner, J. and Savage, R.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogl, J. (2015b) Der Souveränitätseffekt. Zurich-Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. (2006/1759) Candide, or Optimism, translated by Coffe, T.. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2011/1904) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Kahlberg, S.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yuran, N. (2014) What Money Wants: An Economy of Desire. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar