Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:49:12.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Finance, social value, and the rhetoric of GDP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Jacob Assa*
Affiliation:
New School for Social Research, USA
*
Corresponding author: Jacob Assa, New School for Social Research, 6 East 16th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA. Email: assaj401@newschool.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The global financial crisis is usually seen as a failure of neoclassical economic theory and neoliberal policy, but it also represented an epistemological failure. Forecasters who missed the crisis neglected to include the financial sector in their models, while aggregate indicators such as GDP failed in spite (or perhaps because) of their heavy emphasis on financially driven growth. In contrast to both critics and proponents of GDP who see it as a purely statistical measure, this article argues that GDP is in fact a form of numerical rhetoric. Political messages in such estimates were explicit until the early twentieth century, but have since become implicit in hidden assumptions. To uncover the narratives built-in to GDP's view of finance, the article conducts a thought-experiment comparing GDP with two counterfactual indicators corresponding to historical views of finance as either non-productive or an actual cost to society. The analysis shows how changing this single assumption leads to very different narratives regarding the class-balance of workers vs. capitalists, the relative importance of consumption, and the extent of space that exists for public policy to influence the economy. The article concludes with some thoughts on making the implicit assumptions in GDP explicit, and opening up the debate to the broader public in a transparent way.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2018 The Author(s)

References

Andrews, E.L. (2008) Greenspan concedes error on regulation. The New York Times, 23 October. Available at: <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/24/business/economy/24panel.html>. Accessed 9 February 2018..+Accessed+9+February+2018.>Google Scholar
Assa, J. (2015) Gross domestic power: Geopolitical economy and the history of national accounts. In: Desai, R. and Zarembka, P. (eds.), Theoretical Engagements in Geopolitical Economy (Research in Political Economy Volume 30A). Emerald Group, 175203.Google Scholar
Assa, J. (2016) The Financialization of GDP: Implications for Economic Theory and Policy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, W.C. (1974) Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Basu, D. and Foley, D.K. (2013) Dynamics of output and employment in the US economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(5): 10771106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, B.S. (2004) The great moderation. Remarks at the meetings of the Eastern Economic Association, Washington, DC, February 20. Available at: <https://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2004/20040220/>. Accessed 5 February 2018..+Accessed+5+February+2018.>Google Scholar
Bezemer, D. (2010) Understanding financial crisis through accounting models. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7): 676688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, S., Burrows, O., Godin, A., Kinsella, S. and Millard, S. (2016) A dynamic model of financial balances for the United Kingdom. Bank of England Working Paper No. 614. Available at: <https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/working-paper/2016/a-dynamic-model-of-financial-balances-for-the-uk>. Accessed 5 February 2018.CrossRef.+Accessed+5+February+2018.>Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. (1931) The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Christophers, B. (2011) Making finance productive. Economy and Society, 40(1): 112140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D. (2014) GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Economist Intelligence Unit (2013) New data reshape picture of US economy. 1 August. Economist, The (2013). Boundary problems: America has changed the way it measures GDP. Free Exchange, 3 August. Available at: <https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21582498-america-has-changed-way-it-measures-gdp-boundary-problems>. Accessed 9 February 2018.Google Scholar
Epstein, G.A. (2005) Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J.K. (2012) Who are these economists, anyway? In: Papadimitriou, D.B. and Zezza, G. (eds.) Contributions in Stock-flow Modelling. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioramonti, D.L. (2013) Gross Domestic Problem: The Politics Behind the World's Most Powerful Number. London: Zed Books.10.5040/9781350220560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. and Blanchet, D. (2013) Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilferding, R. (1981) Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1940) How to Pay for the War: A Radical Plan for the Chancellor of the Exchequer. London: MacMillan and Co..Google Scholar
Krippner, G.R. (2005) The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2): 173208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepenies, P. (2016) Why GDP? Project Syndicate, 16 August. Available at: <https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-gdp-by-philipp-lepenies-2016-08>. Accessed 5 February 2018..+Accessed+5+February+2018.>Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1986) Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McCarthy, R. (2010) Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein: Our employees are among the most productive in the world. The Huffington Post, 18 March. Available at: <http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-b_n_353504>. Accessed 5 February 2018..+Accessed+5+February+2018.>Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.N. (1983) The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2): 481517.Google Scholar
Mitra-Khan, B.H. (2011). Redefining the Economy: How the ‘Economy’ was Invented 1620. Unpublished doctoral thesis, City University London. Available at: <http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/1276>. Accessed 9 February 2018..+Accessed+9+February+2018.>Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. and Tobin, J. (1972) Is growth obsolete? In: Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Volume 5, Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: NBER, 180.Google Scholar
Petty, W. (1676) Essays on Mankind and Political Arithmetic. Available at: <https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5619/5619-h/5619-h.htm>. Accessed 10 January 2018..+Accessed+10+January+2018.>Google Scholar
Philipsen, D. (2015) The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pilling, D. (2014) Has GDP outgrown its use? The Financial Times, 4 July. Available at: <https://www.ft.com/content/dd2ec158-023d-11e4-ab5b-00144feab7de>. Accessed 9 February 2018.Google Scholar
Shaikh, A.M. and Tonak, E.A. (1996) Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.P. (2010) Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Studenski, P. (1958) The Income of Nations: Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar