Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:41:31.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning by doing: the failure of the 1697 Malt Lottery Loan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2013

Georges Gallais-Hamonno  and
Christian Rietsch
Georges Gallais-Hamonno*
Affiliation:
Université d'Orléans
Christian Rietsch*
Affiliation:
Université d'Orléans
*
Corresponding author: G. Gallais-Hamonno, Emeritus Professor, Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orléans (LEO) LIMR (CNRS) 7322, Faculté de Droit, d'Economie et de Gestion, Université d'Orléans – BP 26739, F-45067 Orléans Cedex 2, France, georges.gallais-hamonno@univ-orleans.fr; C. Rietsch, Associate Professor, christian.rietsch@univ-orleans.fr.
Corresponding author: G. Gallais-Hamonno, Emeritus Professor, Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orléans (LEO) LIMR (CNRS) 7322, Faculté de Droit, d'Economie et de Gestion, Université d'Orléans – BP 26739, F-45067 Orléans Cedex 2, France, georges.gallais-hamonno@univ-orleans.fr; C. Rietsch, Associate Professor, christian.rietsch@univ-orleans.fr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The failure in 1697 of the ‘Malt Lottery’, the second lottery loan, presents a fruitful case study. From a practical point of view, it tells us three things. First, the technical features of the English state lottery loans were established for more than a century after only three experiments. Second, its two components (‘lottery’ and ‘loan’) led to an abnormally poor return for investors since its expected return was 3.91 per cent whereas its effective return was 5.84 per cent – two figures in contradiction with the 6.3 per cent advanced by Dickson (1967). Third, a most strange solution was devised to counteract the failure: delivering the unsold tickets to the Exchequer to be used as cash. From a more theoretical point of view, the condition North and Weingast (1989) advanced for a successful financial issue proves necessary but not sufficient. The Malt Lottery failed (1,763 tickets sold out of 140,000) because it did not meet the three requirements for success: its return was too low and was lower than the return on competitive assets; its reimbursement dates were uncertain; and the economic and political environment was gloomy.

Keywords

1697 lottery loanMalt Lotteryexpected and actual costs of loans and lotterieslottery tickets as legal currency

JEL classification

H63: Debt • Debt Management • Sovereign Debt N23: Europe: Pre-1913
Type
Articles
Information
Financial History Review , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 259 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sources

British History Online / Parliamentary History / Statutes of the Realm. www.british-history.ac.uk.Google Scholar
See volumes VI (1685–94) and VII (1695–1701). The last mentioned is available online at the British Library: HeinOnline: Home page /Data base/Social Science subject/Law/ (UK) Legislation/ (UK) Statutes of the Realm.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers (1898). National Debt: History of the Earlier Years of the Founded Debt from 1694 to 1786. House of Commons Parliamentary Papers online.Google Scholar
Calendar of Treasury Books, vol. 12, 1697 (1933, pp. 303–13).Google Scholar
The City of London Corporation (1697). An Account of the Prizes in the Malt Lottery drawn in August 1697. Printed F. Collins at the Old Bailey. British Library, General Reference Collection, 711k17.Google Scholar
HM Treasury. Public Income and Expenditures, Year 1697 (1898).Google Scholar
Neale, T. (March 1693). A Translation of the Articles Established by the most Excellent Magistracy of Revisors and Regulators of the Publick Revenue in the Exchequer at Venice, and approved by the Senate the 5th of March 1693. [The first page and a half is a translation of the Venetian official text. The two other pages and a half are the Neale's proposal to be drawn on 10 July 1693.]Google Scholar
Neale, T. (1694). The Profitable Adventure to the Fortunate. London.Google Scholar
Neale, T. (1697). The Best Way of Disposing of Hammer'd Money and Plate as for Raising ONE MILLION OF MONNEY in (and for the Service of) The Year 1697, by way of a LOTTERY. [London], printed 4 Feb. 1696/7, reprinted with amendments, 20 Feb. 1696/7.Google Scholar
Wynne Papers (2007). Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Crown Copyright, 6 pages.Google Scholar
www.proni.gov.uk/introduction_wynne_papers_d429.pdfGoogle Scholar

References

Ashton, J. (1893). A History of English Lotteries. London: Leadenhall Press; New York: C. Scribner's & Sons.Google Scholar
Child, Sir F. (n.d). Customer Ledgers, Pawn Accounts and Casting Up Book. London: Royal Bank of Scotland.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1953). The element of lottery in British government bonds, 1694–1919. Economica, 20, pp. 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, P. G. M. (1967). The Financial Revolution in England: A Study in the Development of Public Credit 1688–1756. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Horsefield, J. K. (1956). Inflation and deflation in 1694–1696. Economica, 23, pp. 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsefield, J. K. (1960). British Monetary Experiments, 1650–1710. London: G. Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Jones, D. W. (1988). War and Economy in the Age of William III and Marlborough. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
L'Estrange Ewen, C. (1932). Lotteries and Sweepstakes: An Historical, Legal and Ethical Survey of their Introduction, Suppression and Re-establishment in the British Isles. London: Heath Cranton.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. L. (2005). Lotteries in the 1690s: investment or gamble? Financial History Review, 12, pp. 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, A. L. (2009). The Origins of the English Financial Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, pp. 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldmixton, J. (1735). The History of England during the Reigns of King William and Queen Mary. London: T. Cox.Google Scholar
Quinn, S. (2001). The Glorious Revolution's effect on British private finance: a micro history, 1680–1705. Journal of Economic History, 61(3), pp. 593–615.Google Scholar
Quinn, S. (2006). Securitization of sovereign debt: corporations as a sovereign debt restructuring mechanism in Britain, 1688–1750. UCLA International Institute paper, available online: www.international.ucla.edu/economichistory/eh_papers/quinnucla.pdfGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. D. (1933–7). The lottery in the history of English government finance. Economic History, 3, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. H. (1979). Thomas Neale, a seventeenth-century projector. PhD thesis, University of Southampton.Google Scholar